Origin of language - Wikipedia
文章推薦指數: 80 %
The origin of language its relationship with human evolution, and its consequences have been ... when Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection provoked a ... Originoflanguage FromWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia Jumptonavigation Jumptosearch How,why,when,andwherelanguagemighthaveemerged Thisarticleisabouttheoriginofnaturallanguages.Fortheoriginofprogramminglanguages,seeHistoryofprogramminglanguages. Thisarticlehasmultipleissues.Pleasehelpimproveitordiscusstheseissuesonthetalkpage.(Learnhowandwhentoremovethesetemplatemessages) Thisarticleneedsadditionalcitationsforverification.Pleasehelpimprovethisarticlebyaddingcitationstoreliablesources.Unsourcedmaterialmaybechallengedandremoved.Findsources: "Originoflanguage" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(July2017)(Learnhowandwhentoremovethistemplatemessage) Thisarticle'stoneorstylemaynotreflecttheencyclopedictoneusedonWikipedia.SeeWikipedia'sguidetowritingbetterarticlesforsuggestions.(February2018)(Learnhowandwhentoremovethistemplatemessage) (Learnhowandwhentoremovethistemplatemessage) PartofaseriesonLinguistics OutlineHistoryIndex Generallinguistics Diachronic Lexicography Morphology Phonology Pragmatics Semantics Syntax Syntax–semanticsinterface Typology Appliedlinguistics Acquisition Anthropological Applied Computational Discourseanalysis Documentation Forensic Historyoflinguistics Neurolinguistics Philosophyoflanguage Phonetics Psycholinguistics Sociolinguistics Textandcorpuslinguistics Translatingandinterpreting Writingsystems Theoreticalframeworks Formalist Glossematics Constituency Dependency Distributionalism Generative Functional Pragueschool Functionaldiscoursegrammar Cognitive Usage-based Systemicfunctional Structuralism Topics Autonomyofsyntax Compositionality Conservative/innovativeforms Descriptivism Etymology Iconicity Internetlinguistics LGBTlinguistics Originoflanguage Orthography Philosophyoflinguistics Prescriptivism Second-languageacquisition Theoryoflanguage Portalvte Theoriginoflanguage(spokenandsigned,aswellaslanguage-relatedtechnologicalsystemssuchaswriting),itsrelationshipwithhumanevolution,anditsconsequenceshavebeensubjectsofstudyforcenturies.Scholarswishingtostudytheoriginsoflanguagemustdrawinferencesfromevidencesuchasthefossilrecord,archaeologicalevidence,contemporarylanguagediversity,studiesoflanguageacquisition,andcomparisonsbetweenhumanlanguageandsystemsofcommunicationexistingamonganimals(particularlyotherprimates).Manyarguethattheoriginsoflanguageprobablyrelatecloselytotheoriginsofmodernhumanbehavior,butthereislittleagreementaboutthefactsandimplicationsofthisconnection. Theshortageofdirect,empiricalevidencehascausedmanyscholarstoregardtheentiretopicasunsuitableforseriousstudy;in1866,theLinguisticSocietyofParisbannedanyexistingorfuturedebatesonthesubject,aprohibitionwhichremainedinfluentialacrossmuchoftheWesternworlduntillateinthetwentiethcentury.[1][2]Varioushypotheseshavebeendevelopedabouthow,why,when,andwherelanguagemighthaveemerged.[3]Still,littlemorehasbeenuniversallyagreedupontoday(asof1996)thanoveracenturyandahalfago,whenCharlesDarwin'stheoryofevolutionbynaturalselectionprovokedasurgeofspeculationonthetopic.[4]Sincetheearly1990s,however,anumberoflinguists,archaeologists,psychologists,anthropologists,andothershaveattemptedtoaddressthisissuewithnew,modernmethods.[5] Contents 1Approaches 2Languageoriginhypotheses 2.1Earlyspeculations 2.2Problemsofreliabilityanddeception 2.2.1The"mothertongues"hypothesis 2.2.2The"obligatoryreciprocalaltruism"hypothesis 2.2.3Thegossipandgroominghypothesis 2.2.4Ritual/speechcoevolution 2.3Toolresiliency,grammarandlanguageproduction 2.4Humanistictheory 2.5Chomsky'ssingle-steptheory 2.6TheRomulusandRemushypothesis 2.7Gesturaltheory 2.8Tool-useassociatedsoundintheevolutionoflanguage 2.9Mirrorneuronsandlanguageorigins 2.10Putting-down-the-babytheory 2.11From-where-to-whattheory 2.12Grammaticalisationtheory 2.13Evolution-progressionmodel 2.14Self-domesticatedapetheory 3Speechandlanguageforcommunication 4Cognitivedevelopmentandlanguage 4.1Theoryofmind 4.2Numberrepresentation 5Linguisticstructures 5.1Lexical-phonologicalprinciple 5.2Pidginsandcreoles 6Evolutionarytimeline 6.1Primatecommunication 6.2Ardipithecusramidus 6.3EarlyHomo 6.4ArchaicHomosapiens 6.4.1Homoheidelbergensis 6.4.2Homoneanderthalensis 6.5Homosapiens 6.6Thedescendedlarynx 6.6.1Thesizeexaggerationhypothesis 6.7Phonemicdiversity 7History 7.1Inreligionandmythology 7.2Historicalexperiments 7.3Historyofresearch 8Seealso 9References 10Furtherreading 11Externallinks Approaches[edit] Theoriginoflanguagecanbesub-dividedaccordingtosomeunderlyingassumptions:[6] "Continuitytheories"buildontheideathatlanguageexhibitssomuchcomplexitythatonecannotimagineitsimplyappearingfromnothinginitsfinalform;thereforeitmusthaveevolvedfromearlierpre-linguisticsystemsamonghumans'primateancestors. "Discontinuitytheories"taketheoppositeapproach—thatlanguage,asauniquetraitwhichcannotbecomparedtoanythingfoundamongnon-humans,musthaveappearedfairlysuddenlyduringthecourseofhumanevolution. Sometheoriesconsiderlanguagemostlyasaninnatefaculty—largelygeneticallyencoded. Othertheoriesregardlanguageasamainlyculturalsystem—learnedthroughsocialinteraction. Amajorityoflinguisticscholarsasof2018[update]favourcontinuity-basedtheories,buttheyvaryinhowtheyhypothesizelanguagedevelopment.Amongthosewhoconsiderlanguageasmostlyinnate,someavoidspeculatingaboutspecificprecursorsinnonhumanprimates,stressingsimplythatthelanguagefacultymusthaveevolvedintheusualgradualway.[7]Othersinthisintellectualcamp—notablyIbUlbæk[6]—holdthatlanguageevolvednotfromprimatecommunicationbutfromprimatecognition,whichissignificantlymorecomplex. Thosewhoconsiderlanguageaslearnedsocially,suchasMichaelTomasello,consideritdevelopingfromthecognitivelycontrolledaspectsofprimatecommunication,thesebeingmostlygesturalasopposedtovocal.[8][9]Wherevocalprecursorsareconcerned,manycontinuitytheoristsenvisagelanguageevolvingfromearlyhumancapacitiesforsong.[10][11][12][13][14] NoamChomsky,aproponentofdiscontinuitytheory,arguesthatasinglechancemutationoccurredinoneindividualintheorderof100,000yearsago,installingthelanguagefaculty(ahypotheticalcomponentofthemid-brain)in"perfect"or"near-perfect"form.[15] Transcendingthecontinuity-versus-discontinuitydivide,somescholarsviewtheemergenceoflanguageastheconsequenceofsomekindofsocialtransformation[16]that,bygeneratingunprecedentedlevelsofpublictrust,liberatedageneticpotentialforlinguisticcreativitythathadpreviouslylaindormant.[17][18][19]"Ritual/speechcoevolutiontheory"exemplifiesthisapproach.[20][21]Scholarsinthisintellectualcamppointtothefactthatevenchimpanzeesandbonoboshavelatentsymboliccapacitiesthattheyrarely—ifever—useinthewild.[22]Objectingtothesuddenmutationidea,theseauthorsarguethatevenifachancemutationweretoinstallalanguageorganinanevolvingbipedalprimate,itwouldbeadaptivelyuselessunderallknownprimatesocialconditions.Averyspecificsocialstructure—onecapableofupholdingunusuallyhighlevelsofpublicaccountabilityandtrust—musthaveevolvedbeforeorconcurrentlywithlanguagetomakerelianceon"cheapsignals"(words)anevolutionarilystablestrategy. Sincetheemergenceoflanguageliessofarbackinhumanprehistory,therelevantdevelopmentshaveleftnodirecthistoricaltraces;neithercancomparableprocessesbeobservedtoday.Despitethis,theemergenceofnewsignlanguagesinmoderntimes—NicaraguanSignLanguage,forexample—maypotentiallyofferinsightsintothedevelopmentalstagesandcreativeprocessesnecessarilyinvolved.[23]Anotherapproachinspectsearlyhumanfossils,lookingfortracesofphysicaladaptationtolanguageuse.[24][25]Insomecases,whentheDNAofextincthumanscanberecovered,thepresenceorabsenceofgenesconsideredtobelanguage-relevant—FOXP2,forexample—mayproveinformative.[26]Anotherapproach,thistimearchaeological,involvesinvokingsymbolicbehavior(suchasrepeatedritualactivity)thatmayleaveanarchaeologicaltrace—suchasminingandmodifyingochrepigmentsforbody-painting—whiledevelopingtheoreticalargumentstojustifyinferencesfromsymbolismingeneraltolanguageinparticular.[27][28][29] Thetimerangefortheevolutionoflanguageoritsanatomicalprerequisitesextends,atleastinprinciple,fromthephylogeneticdivergenceofHomo(2.3to2.4millionyearsago)fromPan(5to6millionyearsago)totheemergenceoffullbehavioralmodernitysome50,000–150,000yearsago.FewdisputethatAustralopithecusprobablylackedvocalcommunicationsignificantlymoresophisticatedthanthatofgreatapesingeneral,[30]butscholarlyopinionsvaryastothedevelopmentssincetheappearanceofHomosome2.5millionyearsago.Somescholarsassumethedevelopmentofprimitivelanguage-likesystems(proto-language)asearlyasHomohabilis,whileothersplacethedevelopmentofsymboliccommunicationonlywithHomoerectus(1.8millionyearsago)orwithHomoheidelbergensis(0.6millionyearsago)andthedevelopmentoflanguageproperwithHomosapiens,currentlyestimatedatlessthan200,000yearsago. Usingstatisticalmethodstoestimatethetimerequiredtoachievethecurrentspreadanddiversityinmodernlanguages,JohannaNichols—alinguistattheUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley—arguedin1998thatvocallanguagesmusthavebegundiversifyinginthehumanspeciesatleast100,000yearsago.[31]AfurtherstudybyQ.D.Atkinson[11]suggeststhatsuccessivepopulationbottlenecksoccurredashumanAfricanancestorsmigratedtootherareas,leadingtoadecreaseingeneticandphenotypicdiversity.Atkinsonarguesthatthesebottlenecksalsoaffectedcultureandlanguage,suggestingthatthefartherawayaparticularlanguageisfromAfrica,thefewerphonemesitcontains.Bywayofevidence,Atkinsonclaimsthattoday'sAfricanlanguagestendtohaverelativelylargenumbersofphonemes,whereaslanguagesofOceania(thelastregiontobepopulatedbyhumans)haverelativelyfew.RelyingheavilyonAtkinson'swork,asubsequentstudyhasexploredtherateatwhichphonemesdevelopnaturally,comparingthisratetosomeofAfrica'soldestlanguages.Theresultssuggestthatlanguagefirstevolvedaround50,000–150,000yearsago,whichisaroundthetimewhenmodernHomosapiensevolved.[32]Estimatesofthiskindarenotuniversallyaccepted,butjointlyconsideringgenetic,archaeological,palaeontological,andmuchotherevidenceindicatesthatlanguageprobablyemergedsomewhereinsub-SaharanAfricaduringtheMiddleStoneAge,roughlycontemporaneouswiththespeciationofHomosapiens.[33] Languageoriginhypotheses[edit] Earlyspeculations[edit] Icannotdoubtthatlanguageowesitsorigintotheimitationandmodification,aidedbysignsandgestures,ofvariousnaturalsounds,thevoicesofotheranimals,andman'sowninstinctivecries.— CharlesDarwin,1871.TheDescentofMan,andSelectioninRelationtoSex[34]In1861,historicallinguistMaxMüllerpublishedalistofspeculativetheoriesconcerningtheoriginsofspokenlanguage:[35] Bow-wow.Thebow-woworcuckootheory,whichMüllerattributedtotheGermanphilosopherJohannGottfriedHerder,sawearlywordsasimitationsofthecriesofbeastsandbirds. Pooh-pooh.Thepooh-poohtheorysawthefirstwordsasemotionalinterjectionsandexclamationstriggeredbypain,pleasure,surprise,etc. Ding-dong.Müllersuggestedwhathecalledtheding-dongtheory,whichstatesthatallthingshaveavibratingnaturalresonance,echoedsomehowbymaninhisearliestwords. Yo-he-ho.Theyo-he-hotheoryclaimslanguageemergedfromcollectiverhythmiclabor,theattempttosynchronizemusculareffortresultinginsoundssuchasheavealternatingwithsoundssuchasho. Ta-ta.ThisdidnotfeatureinMaxMüller'slist,havingbeenproposedin1930bySirRichardPaget.[36]Accordingtotheta-tatheory,humansmadetheearliestwordsbytonguemovementsthatmimickedmanualgestures,renderingthemaudible. Mostscholarstodayconsiderallsuchtheoriesnotsomuchwrong—theyoccasionallyofferperipheralinsights—asnaïveandirrelevant.[37][38]Theproblemwiththesetheoriesisthattheyaresonarrowlymechanistic.[citationneeded]Theyassumethatoncehumanancestorshaddiscoveredtheappropriateingeniousmechanismforlinkingsoundswithmeanings,languageautomaticallyevolvedandchanged. MedievalMuslimscholarsalsodevelopedtheoriesontheoriginoflanguage.[39][40]Theirtheorieswereoffivegeneraltypes:[41] Naturalist:Thereisanaturalrelationbetweenexpressionsandthethingstheysignify.Languagethusemergedfromanaturalhumaninclinationtoimitatethesoundsofnature. Conventionalist:Languageisasocialconvention.Thenamesofthingsarearbitraryinventionsofhumans. Revelationist:LanguagewasgiftedtohumansbyGod,anditwasthusGod—andnothumans—whonamedeverything. Revelationist-Conventionalist:Godrevealedtohumansacorebaseoflanguage—enablinghumanstocommunicatewitheachother—andthenhumansinventedtherestoflanguage. Non-Committal:Theviewthatconventionalistandrevelationisttheoriesareequallyplausible. Problemsofreliabilityanddeception[edit] Furtherinformation:Signallingtheory Fromtheperspectiveofsignallingtheory,themainobstacletotheevolutionoflanguage-likecommunicationinnatureisnotamechanisticone.Rather,itisthefactthatsymbols—arbitraryassociationsofsoundsorotherperceptibleformswithcorrespondingmeanings—areunreliableandmaywellbefalse.[42][43]Asthesayinggoes,"wordsarecheap".[44]TheproblemofreliabilitywasnotrecognizedatallbyDarwin,Müllerortheotherearlyevolutionarytheorists. Animalvocalsignalsare,forthemostpart,intrinsicallyreliable.Whenacatpurrs,thesignalconstitutesdirectevidenceoftheanimal'scontentedstate.Thesignalistrusted,notbecausethecatisinclinedtobehonest,butbecauseitjustcannotfakethatsound.[why?]Primatevocalcallsmaybeslightlymoremanipulable,buttheyremainreliableforthesamereason—becausetheyarehardtofake.[45]Primatesocialintelligenceis"Machiavellian"—self-servingandunconstrainedbymoralscruples.Monkeysandapesoftenattempttodeceiveeachother,whileatthesametimeremainingconstantlyonguardagainstfallingvictimtodeceptionthemselves.[46][47]Paradoxically,itistheorizedthatprimates'resistancetodeceptioniswhatblockstheevolutionoftheirsignallingsystemsalonglanguage-likelines.Languageisruledoutbecausethebestwaytoguardagainstbeingdeceivedistoignoreallsignalsexceptthosethatareinstantlyverifiable.Wordsautomaticallyfailthistest.[20] Wordsareeasytofake.Shouldtheyturnouttobelies,listenerswilladaptbyignoringtheminfavorofhard-to-fakeindicesorcues.Forlanguagetowork,then,listenersmustbeconfidentthatthosewithwhomtheyareonspeakingtermsaregenerallylikelytobehonest.[48]Apeculiarfeatureoflanguageis"displacedreference",whichmeansreferencetotopicsoutsidethecurrentlyperceptiblesituation.Thispropertypreventsutterancesfrombeingcorroboratedintheimmediate"here"and"now".Forthisreason,languagepresupposesrelativelyhighlevelsofmutualtrustinordertobecomeestablishedovertimeasanevolutionarilystablestrategy.Thisstabilityisbornofalongstandingmutualtrustandiswhatgrantslanguageitsauthority.Atheoryoftheoriginsoflanguagemustthereforeexplainwhyhumanscouldbegintrustingcheapsignalsinwaysthatotheranimalsapparentlycannot(seesignallingtheory). The"mothertongues"hypothesis[edit] The"mothertongues"hypothesiswasproposedin2004asapossiblesolutiontothisproblem.[49]W.TecumsehFitchsuggestedthattheDarwinianprincipleof"kinselection"[50]—theconvergenceofgeneticinterestsbetweenrelatives—mightbepartoftheanswer.Fitchsuggeststhatlanguageswereoriginally"mothertongues".Iflanguageevolvedinitiallyforcommunicationbetweenmothersandtheirownbiologicaloffspring,extendinglatertoincludeadultrelativesaswell,theinterestsofspeakersandlistenerswouldhavetendedtocoincide.Fitcharguesthatsharedgeneticinterestswouldhaveledtosufficienttrustandcooperationforintrinsicallyunreliablesignals—words—tobecomeacceptedastrustworthyandsobeginevolvingforthefirsttime.[51] Criticsofthistheorypointoutthatkinselectionisnotuniquetohumans.[52]SoevenifoneacceptsFitch'sinitialpremises,theextensionoftheposited"mothertongue"networksfromcloserelativestomoredistantrelativesremainsunexplained.[52]Fitchargues,however,thattheextendedperiodofphysicalimmaturityofhumaninfantsandthepostnatalgrowthofthehumanbraingivethehuman-infantrelationshipadifferentandmoreextendedperiodofintergenerationaldependencythanthatfoundinanyotherspecies.[49] The"obligatoryreciprocalaltruism"hypothesis[edit] IbUlbæk[6]invokesanotherstandardDarwinianprinciple—"reciprocalaltruism"[53]—toexplaintheunusuallyhighlevelsofintentionalhonestynecessaryforlanguagetoevolve."Reciprocalaltruism"canbeexpressedastheprinciplethatifyouscratchmyback,I'llscratchyours.Inlinguisticterms,itwouldmeanthatifyouspeaktruthfullytome,I'llspeaktruthfullytoyou.OrdinaryDarwinianreciprocalaltruism,Ulbækpointsout,isarelationshipestablishedbetweenfrequentlyinteractingindividuals.Forlanguagetoprevailacrossanentirecommunity,however,thenecessaryreciprocitywouldhaveneededtobeenforceduniversallyinsteadofbeinglefttoindividualchoice.Ulbækconcludesthatforlanguagetoevolve,societyasawholemusthavebeensubjecttomoralregulation. Criticspointoutthatthistheoryfailstoexplainwhen,how,whyorbywhom"obligatoryreciprocalaltruism"couldpossiblyhavebeenenforced.[21]Variousproposalshavebeenofferedtoremedythisdefect.[21]Afurthercriticismisthatlanguagedoesnotworkonthebasisofreciprocalaltruismanyway.Humansinconversationalgroupsdonotwithholdinformationtoallexceptlistenerslikelytooffervaluableinformationinreturn.Onthecontrary,theyseemtowanttoadvertisetotheworldtheiraccesstosociallyrelevantinformation,broadcastingthatinformationwithoutexpectationofreciprocitytoanyonewhowilllisten.[54] Thegossipandgroominghypothesis[edit] Gossip,accordingtoRobinDunbarinhisbookGrooming,GossipandtheEvolutionofLanguage,doesforgroup-livinghumanswhatmanualgroomingdoesforotherprimates—itallowsindividualstoservicetheirrelationshipsandsomaintaintheiralliancesonthebasisoftheprinciple:ifyouscratchmyback,I'llscratchyours.Dunbararguesthatashumansbeganlivinginincreasinglylargersocialgroups,thetaskofmanuallygroomingallone'sfriendsandacquaintancesbecamesotime-consumingastobeunaffordable.[55]Inresponsetothisproblem,humansdeveloped"acheapandultra-efficientformofgrooming"—vocalgrooming.Tokeepallieshappy,onenowneedsonlyto"groom"themwithlow-costvocalsounds,servicingmultiplealliessimultaneouslywhilekeepingbothhandsfreeforothertasks.Vocalgroomingthenevolvedgraduallyintovocallanguage—initiallyintheformof"gossip".[55]Dunbar'shypothesisseemstobesupportedbythefactthatthestructureoflanguageshowsadaptationstothefunctionofnarrationingeneral.[56] Criticsofthistheorypointoutthattheveryefficiencyof"vocalgrooming"—thefactthatwordsaresocheap—wouldhaveundermineditscapacitytosignalcommitmentofthekindconveyedbytime-consumingandcostlymanualgrooming.[57]Afurthercriticismisthatthetheorydoesnothingtoexplainthecrucialtransitionfromvocalgrooming—theproductionofpleasingbutmeaninglesssounds—tothecognitivecomplexitiesofsyntacticalspeech. Ritual/speechcoevolution[edit] Theritual/speechcoevolutiontheorywasoriginallyproposedbysocialanthropologistRoyRappaport[17]beforebeingelaboratedbyanthropologistssuchasChrisKnight,[20]JeromeLewis,[58]NickEnfield,[59]CamillaPower[48]andIanWatts.[29]CognitivescientistandroboticsengineerLucSteels[60]isanotherprominentsupporterofthisgeneralapproach,asisbiologicalanthropologistandneuroscientistTerrenceDeacon.[61] Thesescholarsarguethattherecanbenosuchthingasa"theoryoftheoriginsoflanguage".Thisisbecauselanguageisnotaseparateadaptationbutaninternalaspectofsomethingmuchwider—namely,humansymboliccultureasawhole.[19]Attemptstoexplainlanguageindependentlyofthiswidercontexthavefailed,saythesescientists,becausetheyareaddressingaproblemwithnosolution.Languagewouldnotworkoutsideaspecificarrayofsocialmechanismsandinstitutions.Forexample,itwouldnotworkforanonhumanapecommunicatingwithothersinthewild.Noteventhecleverestnonhumanapecouldmakelanguageworkundersuchconditions. Lieandalternative,inherentinlanguage...poseproblemstoanysocietywhosestructureisfoundedonlanguage,whichistosayallhumansocieties.IhavethereforearguedthatiftherearetobewordsatallitisnecessarytoestablishTheWord,andthatTheWordisestablishedbytheinvarianceofliturgy.— RoyRappaport[62] Advocatesofthisschoolofthoughtpointoutthatwordsarecheap.Shouldanespeciallyclevernonhumanape,orevenagroupofarticulatenonhumanapes,trytousewordsinthewild,theywouldcarrynoconviction.Theprimatevocalizationsthatdocarryconviction—thosetheyactuallyuse—areunlikewords,inthattheyareemotionallyexpressive,intrinsicallymeaningful,andreliablebecausetheyarerelativelycostlyandhardtofake. Languageconsistsofcontrastswhosecostisessentiallyzero.Aspuresocialconventions,signalsofthiskindcannotevolveinaDarwiniansocialworld—theyareatheoreticalimpossibility.[42]Beingintrinsicallyunreliable,languageworksonlyifonecanbuildupareputationfortrustworthinesswithinacertainkindofsociety—namely,onewheresymbolicculturalfacts(sometimescalled"institutionalfacts")canbeestablishedandmaintainedthroughcollectivesocialendorsement.[63]Inanyhunter-gatherersociety,thebasicmechanismforestablishingtrustinsymbolicculturalfactsiscollectiveritual.[64]Therefore,thetaskfacingresearchersintotheoriginsoflanguageismoremultidisciplinarythanisusuallysupposed.Itinvolvesaddressingtheevolutionaryemergenceofhumansymboliccultureasawhole,withlanguageanimportantbutsubsidiarycomponent. CriticsofthetheoryincludeNoamChomsky,whotermsitthe"non-existence"hypothesis—adenialoftheveryexistenceoflanguageasanobjectofstudyfornaturalscience.[65]Chomsky'sowntheoryisthatlanguageemergedinaninstantandinperfectform,[66]promptinghiscriticsinturn,toretortthatonlysomethingthatdoesnotexist—atheoreticalconstructorconvenientscientificfiction—couldpossiblyemergeinsuchamiraculousway.[18]Thecontroversyremainsunresolved. Toolresiliency,grammarandlanguageproduction[edit] WhileitispossibletoimitatethemakingoftoolslikethosemadebyearlyHomoundercircumstancesofdemonstration,researchonprimatetoolculturesshowthatnon-verbalculturesarevulnerabletoenvironmentalchange.Inparticular,iftheenvironmentinwhichaskillcanbeuseddisappearsforalongerperiodoftimethananindividualape'sorearlyhuman'slifespan,theskillwillbelostifthecultureisimitativeandnon-verbal.Chimpanzees,macaquesandcapuchinmonkeysareallknowntolosetooltechniquesundersuchcircumstances.ResearchersonprimateculturevulnerabilitythereforearguethatsinceearlyHomospeciesasfarbackasHomohabilisretainedtheirtoolculturesdespitemanyclimatechangecyclesatthetimescalesofcenturiestomillenniaeach,thesespecieshadsufficientlydevelopedlanguageabilitiestoverballydescribecompleteprocedures,andthereforegrammarandnotonlytwo-word"proto-language".[67][68] ThetheorythatearlyHomospecieshadsufficientlydevelopedbrainsforgrammarisalsosupportedbyresearcherswhostudybraindevelopmentinchildren,notingthatgrammarisdevelopedwhileconnectionsacrossthebrainarestillsignificantlylowerthanadultlevel.TheseresearchersarguethattheseloweredsystemrequirementsforgrammaticallanguagemakeitplausiblethatthegenusHomohadgrammaratconnectionlevelsinthebrainthatweresignificantlylowerthanthoseofHomosapiensandthatmorerecentstepsintheevolutionofthehumanbrainwerenotaboutlanguage.[69][70] AcheuleantoolusebeganduringtheLowerPaleolithicapproximately1.75millionyearsago.StudiesfocusingonthelateralizationofAcheuleantoolproductionandlanguageproductionhavenotedsimilarareasofbloodflowwhenengagingintheseactivitiesseparately;thistheorysuggeststhatthebrainfunctionsneededfortheproductionoftoolsacrossgenerationsisconsistentwiththebrainsystemsrequiredforproducinglanguage.ResearchersusedfunctionaltranscranialDopplerultrasonography(fTDC)andhadparticipantsperformactivitiesrelatedtothecreationoftoolsusingthesamemethodsduringtheLowerPaleolithicaswellasataskdesignedspecificallyforwordgeneration.[71]ThepurposeofthistestwastofocusontheplanningaspectofAcheuleantoolmakingandcuedwordgenerationinlanguage(anexampleofcuedwordgenerationwouldbesomeonegivingyouarandomletterandthenyoulistallwordsbeginningwiththatletterthatyoucanthinkof).Theoriesoflanguagedevelopingalongsidetoolusehasbeentheorizedbymultipleindividuals,[72][73][74]howeveruntilrecentlytherehasbeenlittleempiricaldatatosupportthesehypotheses.FocusingontheresultsofthestudyperformedbyUominietal.evidencefortheusageofthesamebrainareashasbeenfoundwhenlookingatcuedwordgenerationandAchueleantooluse.Therelationshipbetweentooluseandlanguageproductionisfoundinworkingandplanningmemoryrespectivelyandwasfoundtobesimilaracrossavarietyofparticipantsfurtheringevidencethattheseareasofthebrainareshared.[71]ThisevidencelendscredibilitytothetheorythatlanguagedevelopedalongsidetooluseintheLowerPaleolithic. Humanistictheory[edit] Thehumanistictraditionconsiderslanguageasahumaninvention.RenaissancephilosopherAntoineArnauldgaveadetaileddescriptionofhisideaoftheoriginoflanguageinPort-RoyalGrammar.AccordingtoArnauld,peoplearesocialandrationalbynature,andthisurgedthemtocreatelanguageasameanstocommunicatetheirideastoothers.Languageconstructionwouldhaveoccurredthroughaslowandgradualprocess.[75]Inlatertheory,especiallyinfunctionallinguistics,theprimacyofcommunicationisemphasisedoverpsychologicalneeds.[76] Theexactwaylanguageevolvedishowevernotconsideredasvitaltothestudyoflanguages.StructurallinguistFerdinanddeSaussureabandonedevolutionarylinguisticsafterhavingcometothefirmconclusionthatitwouldnotbeabletoprovideanyfurtherrevolutionaryinsightafterthecompletionofthemajorworksinhistoricallinguisticsbytheendofthe19thcentury.SaussurewasparticularlyscepticaloftheattemptsofAugustSchleicherandotherDarwinianlinguiststoaccessprehistoricallanguagesthroughseriesofreconstructionsofproto-languages.[77] Evolutionaryresearchhadmanyothercritics,too.TheParislinguisticsocietyfamouslybannedthetopicoflanguageevolutionin1866becauseitwasconsideredaslackingscientificproof.[78]Aroundthesametime,MaxMüllerridiculedpopularaccountstoexplainlanguageorigin.Inhisclassifications,the"bow-wowtheory"isthetypeofexplanationthatconsiderslanguagesashavingevolvedasanimitationofnaturalsounds.The"pooh-poohtheory"holdsthatspeechoriginatedfromspontaneoushumancriesandexclamations;the"yo-he-hotheory"suggeststhatlanguagedevelopedfromgruntsandgaspsevokedbyphysicalexertion;whilethe"sing-songtheory"claimsthatspeecharosefromprimitiveritualchants.[79] Saussure'ssolutiontotheproblemoflanguageevolutioninvolvesdividingtheoreticallinguisticsintwo.Evolutionaryandhistoricallinguisticsarerenamedasdiachroniclinguistics.Itisthestudyoflanguagechange,butithasonlylimitedexplanatorypowerduetotheinadequacyofallofthereliableresearchmaterialthatcouldeverbemadeavailable.Synchroniclinguistics,incontrast,aimstowidenscientists'understandingoflanguagethroughastudyofagivencontemporaryorhistoricallanguagestageasasysteminitsownright.[80] AlthoughSaussurepaidmuchfocustodiachroniclinguistics,laterstructuralistswhoequatedstructuralismwiththesynchronicanalysisweresometimescriticisedofahistoricism.AccordingtostructuralanthropologistClaudeLévi-Strauss,languageandmeaning—inoppositionto"knowledge,whichdevelopsslowlyandprogressively"—musthaveappearedinaninstant.[81] Structuralism,asfirstintroducedtosociologybyÉmileDurkheim,isnonethelessatypeofhumanisticevolutionarytheorywhichexplainsdiversificationasnecessitatedbygrowingcomplexity.[82]TherewasashiftoffocustofunctionalexplanationafterSaussure'sdeath.FunctionalstructuralistsincludingthePragueCirclelinguistsandAndréMartinetexplainedthegrowthandmaintenanceofstructuresasbeingnecessitatedbytheirfunctions.[76]Forexample,noveltechnologiesmakeitnecessaryforpeopletoinventnewwords,butthesemaylosetheirfunctionandbeforgottenasthetechnologiesareeventuallyreplacedbymoremodernones. Chomsky'ssingle-steptheory[edit] AccordingtoNoamChomsky'ssingle-mutationtheory,theemergenceoflanguageresembledtheformationofacrystal;withdigitalinfinityastheseedcrystalinasuper-saturatedprimatebrain,onthevergeofblossomingintothehumanmind,byphysicallaw,onceevolutionaddedasinglesmallbutcrucialkeystone.[83][66]Thus,inthistheory,languageappearedrathersuddenlywithinthehistoryofhumanevolution.Chomsky,writingwithcomputationallinguistandcomputerscientistRobertC. Berwick,suggeststhatthisscenarioiscompletelycompatiblewithmodernbiology.Theynotethat"noneoftherecentaccountsofhumanlanguageevolutionseemtohavecompletelygraspedtheshiftfromconventionalDarwinismtoitsfullystochasticmodernversion—specifically,thattherearestochasticeffectsnotonlyduetosamplinglikedirectionlessdrift,butalsoduetodirectedstochasticvariationinfitness,migration,andheritability—indeed,allthe"forces"thataffectindividualorgenefrequencies ...Allthiscanaffectevolutionaryoutcomes—outcomesthatasfaraswecanmakeoutarenotbroughtoutinrecentbooksontheevolutionoflanguage,yetwouldariseimmediatelyinthecaseofanynewgeneticorindividualinnovation,preciselythekindofscenariolikelytobeinplaywhentalkingaboutlanguage'semergence." CitingevolutionarygeneticistSvantePääbo,theyconcurthatasubstantialdifferencemusthaveoccurredtodifferentiateHomosapiensfromNeanderthalsto"prompttherelentlessspreadofourspecies,whohadnevercrossedopenwater,upandoutofAfricaandthenonacrosstheentireplanetinjustafewtensofthousandsofyears. ...Whatwedonotseeisanykindof'gradualism'innewtooltechnologiesorinnovationslikefire,shelters,orfigurativeart."BerwickandChomskythereforesuggestlanguageemergedapproximatelybetween200,000yearsagoand60,000yearsago(betweentheappearanceofthefirstanatomicallymodernhumansinsouthernAfricaandthelastexodusfromAfricarespectively)."Thatleavesuswithabout130,000years,orapproximately5,000–6,000generationsoftimeforevolutionarychange.Thisisnot'overnightinonegeneration'assomehave(incorrectly)inferred—butneitherisitonthescaleofgeologicaleons.It'stimeenough—withintheballparkforwhatNilssonandPelger(1994)estimatedasthetimerequiredforthefullevolutionofavertebrateeyefromasinglecell,evenwithouttheinvocationofany'evo-devo'effects."[84] Thesingle-mutationtheoryoflanguageevolutionhasbeendirectlyquestionedondifferentgrounds.Aformalanalysisoftheprobabilityofsuchamutationtakingplaceandgoingtofixationinthespecieshasconcludedthatsuchascenarioisunlikely,withmultiplemutationswithmoremoderatefitnesseffectsbeingmoreprobable.[85]AnothercriticismhasquestionedthelogicoftheargumentforsinglemutationandputsforwardthatfromtheformalsimplicityofMerge,thecapacityBerwickandChomskydeemthecorepropertyofhumanlanguagethatemergedsuddenly,onecannotderivethe(numberof)evolutionarystepsthatledtoit.[86] TheRomulusandRemushypothesis[edit] Seealso:Recursion§ Inlanguage,andPrefrontalsynthesis TheRomulusandRemushypothesis,proposedbyneuroscientistAndreyVyshedskiy,seekstoaddressthequestionastowhythemodernspeechapparatusoriginatedover500,000yearsbeforetheearliestsignsofmodernhumanimagination.Thishypothesisproposesthatthereweretwophasesthatledtomodernrecursivelanguage.Thephenomenonofrecursionoccursacrossmultiplelinguisticdomains,arguablymostprominentlyinsyntaxandmorphology.Thus,bynestingastructuresuchasasentenceorawordwithinthemselves,itenablesthegenerationofpotentially(countably)infinitenewvariationsofthatstructure.Forexample,thebasesentence[Peterlikesapples.]canbenestedinirrealisclausestoproduce[[Marysaid[Peterlikesapples.]],[Paulbelieved[Marysaid[Peterlikesapples.]]]andsoforth.[87] Thefirstphaseincludestheslowdevelopmentofnon-recursivelanguagewithalargevocabularyalongwiththemodernspeechapparatus,whichincludeschangestothehyoidbone,increasedvoluntarycontrolofthemusclesofthediaphragm,theevolutionoftheFOXP2gene,aswellasotherchangesby600,000 yearsago.[88]Then,thesecondphasewasarapidChomskiansinglestep,consistingofthreedistincteventsthathappenedinquicksuccessionaround70,000 yearsagoandallowedtheshiftfromnon-recursivetorecursivelanguageinearlyhominins. Ageneticmutationthatsloweddowntheprefrontalsynthesis(PFS)criticalperiodofatleasttwochildrenthatlivedtogether. Thisallowedthesechildrentocreaterecursiveelementsoflanguagesuchasspatialprepositions. Thenthismergedwiththeirparents'non-recursivelanguagetocreaterecursivelanguage.[89] Itisnotenoughforchildrentohaveamodernprefrontalcortex(PFC)toallowthedevelopmentofPFS;thechildrenmustalsobementallystimulatedandhaverecursiveelementsalreadyintheirlanguagetoacquirePFS.Sincetheirparentswouldnothaveinventedtheseelementsyet,thechildrenwouldhavehadtodoitthemselves,whichisacommonoccurrenceamongyoungchildrenthatlivetogether,inaprocesscalledcryptophasia.[90]ThismeansthatdelayedPFCdevelopmentwouldhaveallowedmoretimetoacquirePFSanddeveloprecursiveelements. DelayedPFCdevelopmentalsocomeswithnegativeconsequences,suchasalongerperiodofrelianceonone'sparentstosurviveandlowersurvivalrates.Formodernlanguagetohaveoccurred,PFCdelayhadtohaveanimmensesurvivalbenefitinlaterlife,suchasPFSability.ThissuggeststhatthemutationthatcausedPFCdelayandthedevelopmentofrecursivelanguageandPFSoccurredsimultaneously,whichlinesupwithevidenceofageneticbottleneckaround70,000 yearsago.[91]ThiscouldhavebeentheresultofafewindividualswhodevelopedPFSandrecursivelanguagewhichgavethemsignificantcompetitiveadvantageoverallotherhumansatthetime.[89] Gesturaltheory[edit] Thegesturaltheorystatesthathumanlanguagedevelopedfromgesturesthatwereusedforsimplecommunication. Twotypesofevidencesupportthistheory. Gesturallanguageandvocallanguagedependonsimilarneuralsystems.Theregionsonthecortexthatareresponsibleformouthandhandmovementsbordereachother. Nonhumanprimatescanusegesturesorsymbolsforatleastprimitivecommunication,andsomeoftheirgesturesresemblethoseofhumans,suchasthe"beggingposture",withthehandsstretchedout,whichhumanssharewithchimpanzees.[92][93] Researchhasfoundstrongsupportfortheideathatverballanguageandsignlanguagedependonsimilarneuralstructures.Patientswhousedsignlanguage,andwhosufferedfromaleft-hemispherelesion,showedthesamedisorderswiththeirsignlanguageasvocalpatientsdidwiththeirorallanguage.[94]Otherresearchersfoundthatthesameleft-hemispherebrainregionswereactiveduringsignlanguageasduringtheuseofvocalorwrittenlanguage.[95] Primategestureisatleastpartiallygenetic:differentnonhumanapeswillperformgesturescharacteristicoftheirspecies,eveniftheyhaveneverseenanotherapeperformthatgesture.Forexample,gorillasbeattheirbreasts.Thisshowsthatgesturesareanintrinsicandimportantpartofprimatecommunication,whichsupportstheideathatlanguageevolvedfromgesture.[96] Furtherevidencesuggeststhatgestureandlanguagearelinked.Inhumans,manuallygesturinghasaneffectonconcurrentvocalizations,thuscreatingcertainnaturalvocalassociationsofmanualefforts.Chimpanzeesmovetheirmouthswhenperformingfinemotortasks.Thesemechanismsmayhaveplayedanevolutionaryroleinenablingthedevelopmentofintentionalvocalcommunicationasasupplementtogesturalcommunication.Voicemodulationcouldhavebeenpromptedbypreexistingmanualactions.[96] Frominfancy,gesturesbothsupplementandpredictspeech.[97][98]Thisaddressestheideathatgesturesquicklychangeinhumansfromasolemeansofcommunication(fromaveryyoungage)toasupplementalandpredictivebehaviorthatisuseddespitetheabilitytocommunicateverbally.Thistooservesasaparalleltotheideathatgesturesdevelopedfirstandlanguagesubsequentlybuiltuponit. Twopossiblescenarioshavebeenproposedforthedevelopmentoflanguage,[99]oneofwhichsupportsthegesturaltheory: Languagedevelopedfromthecallsofhumanancestors. Languagewasderivedfromgesture. Thefirstperspectivethatlanguageevolvedfromthecallsofhumanancestorsseemslogicalbecausebothhumansandanimalsmakesoundsorcries.Oneevolutionaryreasontorefutethisisthat,anatomically,thecentrethatcontrolscallsinmonkeysandotheranimalsislocatedinacompletelydifferentpartofthebrainthaninhumans.Inmonkeys,thiscentreislocatedinthedepthsofthebrainrelatedtoemotions.Inthehumansystem,itislocatedinanareaunrelatedtoemotion.Humanscancommunicatesimplytocommunicate—withoutemotions.So,anatomically,thisscenariodoesnotwork.[99]Thissuggeststhatlanguagewasderivedfromgesture[100](humanscommunicatedbygesturefirstandsoundwasattachedlater). Theimportantquestionforgesturaltheoriesiswhytherewasashifttovocalization.Variousexplanationshavebeenproposed: Humanancestorsstartedtousemoreandmoretools,meaningthattheirhandswereoccupiedandcouldnolongerbeusedforgesturing.[101] Manualgesturingrequiresthatspeakersandlistenersbevisibletooneanother.Inmanysituations,theymightneedtocommunicate,evenwithoutvisualcontact—forexampleafternightfallorwhenfoliageobstructsvisibility. Acompositehypothesisholdsthatearlylanguagetooktheformofpartgesturalandpartvocalmimesis(imitative'song-and-dance'),combiningmodalitiesbecauseallsignals(likethoseofnonhumanapesandmonkeys)stillneededtobecostlyinordertobeintrinsicallyconvincing.Inthatevent,eachmulti-mediadisplaywouldhaveneedednotjusttodisambiguateanintendedmeaningbutalsotoinspireconfidenceinthesignal'sreliability.Thesuggestionisthatonlyoncecommunity-widecontractualunderstandingshadcomeintoforce[102]couldtrustincommunicativeintentionsbeautomaticallyassumed,atlastallowingHomosapienstoshifttoamoreefficientdefaultformat.Sincevocaldistinctivefeatures(soundcontrasts)areidealforthispurpose,itwasonlyatthispoint—whenintrinsicallypersuasivebody-languagewasnolongerrequiredtoconveyeachmessage—thatthedecisiveshiftfrommanualgesturetothecurrentprimaryrelianceonspokenlanguageoccurred.[18][20][103] Acomparablehypothesisstatesthatin'articulate'language,gestureandvocalisationareintrinsicallylinked,aslanguageevolvedfromequallyintrinsicallylinkeddanceandsong.[14] Humansstillusemanualandfacialgestureswhentheyspeak,especiallywhenpeoplemeetwhohavenolanguageincommon.[104]Therearealsoagreatnumberofsignlanguagesstillinexistence,commonlyassociatedwithdeafcommunities.Thesesignlanguagesareequalincomplexity,sophistication,andexpressivepower,toanyorallanguage.[105]Thecognitivefunctionsaresimilarandthepartsofthebrainusedaresimilar.Themaindifferenceisthatthe"phonemes"areproducedontheoutsideofthebody,articulatedwithhands,body,andfacialexpression,ratherthaninsidethebodyarticulatedwithtongue,teeth,lips,andbreathing.[106](Comparethemotortheoryofspeechperception.) Criticsofgesturaltheorynotethatitisdifficulttonameseriousreasonswhytheinitialpitch-basedvocalcommunication(whichispresentinprimates)wouldbeabandonedinfavorofthemuchlesseffectivenon-vocal,gesturalcommunication.[107]However,MichaelCorballishaspointedoutthatitissupposedthatprimatevocalcommunication(suchasalarmcalls)cannotbecontrolledconsciously,unlikehandmovement,andthusitisnotcredibleasprecursortohumanlanguage;primatevocalizationisratherhomologoustoandcontinuedininvoluntaryreflexes(connectedwithbasichumanemotions)suchasscreamsorlaughter(thefactthatthesecanbefakeddoesnotdisprovethefactthatgenuineinvoluntaryresponsestofearorsurpriseexist).[100]Also,gestureisnotgenerallylesseffective,anddependingonthesituationcanevenbeadvantageous,forexampleinaloudenvironmentorwhereitisimportanttobesilent,suchasonahunt.Otherchallengestothe"gesture-first"theoryhavebeenpresentedbyresearchersinpsycholinguistics,includingDavidMcNeill.[108] Tool-useassociatedsoundintheevolutionoflanguage[edit] Proponentsofthemotortheoryoflanguageevolutionhaveprimarilyfocusedonthevisualdomainandcommunicationthroughobservationofmovements.TheTool-usesoundhypothesissuggeststhattheproductionandperceptionofsoundalsocontributedsubstantially,particularlyincidentalsoundoflocomotion(ISOL)andtool-usesound(TUS).[109]HumanbipedalismresultedinrhythmicandmorepredictableISOL.Thatmayhavestimulatedtheevolutionofmusicalabilities,auditoryworkingmemory,andabilitiestoproducecomplexvocalizations,andtomimicnaturalsounds.[110]Sincethehumanbrainproficientlyextractsinformationaboutobjectsandeventsfromthesoundstheyproduce,TUS,andmimicryofTUS,mighthaveachievedaniconicfunction.Theprevalenceofsoundsymbolisminmanyextantlanguagessupportsthisidea.Self-producedTUSactivatesmultimodalbrainprocessing(motorneurons,hearing,proprioception,touch,vision),andTUSstimulatesprimateaudiovisualmirrorneurons,whichislikelytostimulatethedevelopmentofassociationchains.Tooluseandauditorygesturesinvolvemotor-processingoftheforelimbs,whichisassociatedwiththeevolutionofvertebratevocalcommunication.Theproduction,perception,andmimicryofTUSmayhaveresultedinalimitednumberofvocalizationsorprotowordsthatwereassociatedwithtooluse.[109]Anewwaytocommunicateabouttools,especiallywhenoutofsight,wouldhavehadselectiveadvantage.Agradualchangeinacousticproperties,meaning,orbothcouldhaveresultedinarbitrarinessandanexpandedrepertoireofwords.HumanshavebeenincreasinglyexposedtoTUSovermillionsofyears,coincidingwiththeperiodduringwhichspokenlanguageevolved. Mirrorneuronsandlanguageorigins[edit] Inhumans,functionalMRIstudieshavereportedfindingareashomologoustothemonkeymirrorneuronsystemintheinferiorfrontalcortex,closetoBroca'sarea,oneofthelanguageregionsofthebrain.Thishasledtosuggestionsthathumanlanguageevolvedfromagestureperformance/understandingsystemimplementedinmirrorneurons.Mirrorneuronshavebeensaidtohavethepotentialtoprovideamechanismforaction-understanding,imitation-learning,andthesimulationofotherpeople'sbehavior.[111]ThishypothesisissupportedbysomecytoarchitectonichomologiesbetweenmonkeypremotorareaF5andhumanBroca'sarea.[112] Ratesofvocabularyexpansionlinktotheabilityofchildrentovocallymirrornon-wordsandsotoacquirethenewwordpronunciations.Suchspeechrepetitionoccursautomatically,quickly[113]andseparatelyinthebraintospeechperception.[114][115]Moreover,suchvocalimitationcanoccurwithoutcomprehensionsuchasinspeechshadowing[116]andecholalia.[112][117]FurtherevidenceforthislinkcomesfromarecentstudyinwhichthebrainactivityoftwoparticipantswasmeasuredusingfMRIwhiletheyweregesturingwordstoeachotherusinghandgestureswithagameofcharades—amodalitythatsomehavesuggestedmightrepresenttheevolutionaryprecursorofhumanlanguage.AnalysisofthedatausingGrangerCausalityrevealedthatthemirror-neuronsystemoftheobserverindeedreflectsthepatternofactivityofinthemotorsystemofthesender,supportingtheideathatthemotorconceptassociatedwiththewordsisindeedtransmittedfromonebraintoanotherusingthemirrorsystem.[118] Notalllinguistsagreewiththeabovearguments,however.Inparticular,supportersofNoamChomskyargueagainstthepossibilitythatthemirrorneuronsystemcanplayanyroleinthehierarchicalrecursivestructuresessentialtosyntax.[119] Putting-down-the-babytheory[edit] AccordingtoDeanFalk's"putting-down-the-baby"theory,vocalinteractionsbetweenearlyhominidmothersandinfantsbeganasequenceofeventsthatled,eventually,tohumanancestors'earliestwords.[120]Thebasicideaisthatevolvinghumanmothers,unliketheircounterpartsinotherprimates,couldnotmovearoundandforagewiththeirinfantsclingingontotheirbacks.Lossoffurinthehumancaseleftinfantswithnomeansofclingingon.Frequently,therefore,mothershadtoputtheirbabiesdown.Asaresult,thesebabiesneededtobereassuredthattheywerenotbeingabandoned.Mothersrespondedbydeveloping'motherese'—aninfant-directedcommunicativesystemembracingfacialexpressions,bodylanguage,touching,patting,caressing,laughter,ticklingandemotionallyexpressivecontactcalls.Theargumentisthatlanguagedevelopedoutofthisinteraction.[120] InTheMentalandSocialLifeofBabies,psychologistKennethKayenotedthatnousableadultlanguagecouldhaveevolvedwithoutinteractivecommunicationbetweenveryyoungchildrenandadults."Nosymbolicsystemcouldhavesurvivedfromonegenerationtothenextifitcouldnothavebeeneasilyacquiredbyyoungchildrenundertheirnormalconditionsofsociallife."[121] From-where-to-whattheory[edit] Anillustrationofthe"fromwheretowhat"modeloflanguageevolution The"fromwheretowhat"modelisalanguageevolutionmodelthatisderivedprimarilyfromtheorganizationoflanguageprocessinginthebrainintotwostructures:theauditorydorsalstreamandtheauditoryventralstream.[122][123]Ithypothesizessevenstagesoflanguageevolution(seeillustration).Speechoriginatedforthepurposeofexchangingcontactcallsbetweenmothersandtheiroffspringtofindoneanotherintheeventtheybecameseparated(illustrationpart 1).Thecontactcallscouldbemodifiedwithintonationsinordertoexpresseitherahigherorlowerlevelofdistress(illustrationpart 2).Theuseoftwotypesofcontactcallsenabledthefirstquestion-answerconversation.Inthisscenario,thechildwouldemitalow-leveldistresscalltoexpressadesiretointeractwithanobject,andthemotherwouldrespondwitheitheranotherlow-leveldistresscall(toexpressapprovaloftheinteraction)orahigh-leveldistresscall(toexpressdisapproval)(illustrationpart 3).Overtime,theimproveduseofintonationsandvocalcontrolledtotheinventionofuniquecalls(phonemes)associatedwithdistinctobjects(illustrationpart 4).Atfirst,childrenlearnedthecalls(phonemes)fromtheirparentsbyimitatingtheirlip-movements(illustrationpart 5).Eventually,infantswereabletoencodeintolong-termmemoryallthecalls(phonemes).Consequentially,mimicryvialip-readingwaslimitedtoinfancyandolderchildrenlearnednewcallsthroughmimicrywithoutlip-reading(illustrationpart 6).Onceindividualsbecamecapableofproducingasequenceofcalls,thisallowedmulti-syllabicwords,whichincreasedthesizeoftheirvocabulary(illustrationpart 7).Theuseofwords,composedofsequencesofsyllables,providedtheinfrastructureforcommunicatingwithsequencesofwords(i.e.,sentences). Thetheory'snameisderivedfromthetwoauditorystreams,whicharebothfoundinthebrainsofhumansandotherprimates.Theauditoryventralstreamisresponsibleforsoundrecognition,andsoitisreferredtoastheauditorywhatstream.[124][125][126]Inprimates,theauditorydorsalstreamisresponsibleforsoundlocalization,andthusitiscalledtheauditorywherestream.Onlyinhumans(inthelefthemisphere),isitalsoresponsibleforotherprocessesassociatedwithlanguageuseandacquisition,suchasspeechrepetitionandproduction,integrationofphonemeswiththeirlipmovements,perceptionandproductionofintonations,phonologicallong-termmemory(long-termmemorystorageofthesoundsofwords),andphonologicalworkingmemory(thetemporarystorageofthesoundsofwords).[127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134]Someevidencealsoindicatesaroleinrecognisingothersbytheirvoices.[135][136]Theemergenceofeachofthesefunctionsintheauditorydorsalstreamrepresentsanintermediatestageintheevolutionoflanguage. Acontactcalloriginforhumanlanguageisconsistentwithanimalstudies,aslikehumanlanguage,contactcalldiscriminationinmonkeysislateralisedtothelefthemisphere.[137][138]Micewithknock-outtolanguagerelatedgenes(suchasFOXP2andSRPX2)alsoresultedinthepupsnolongeremittingcontactcallswhenseparatedfromtheirmothers.[139][140]Supportingthismodelisalsoitsabilitytoexplainuniquehumanphenomena,suchastheuseofintonationswhenconvertingwordsintocommandsandquestions,thetendencyofinfantstomimicvocalisationsduringthefirstyearoflife(anditsdisappearancelateron)andtheprotrudingandvisiblehumanlips,whicharenotfoundinotherapes.Thistheorycouldbeconsideredanelaborationoftheputting-down-the-babytheoryoflanguageevolution. Grammaticalisationtheory[edit] "Grammaticalisation"isacontinuoushistoricalprocessinwhichfree-standingwordsdevelopintogrammaticalappendages,whiletheseinturnbecomeevermorespecialisedandgrammatical.Aninitially"incorrect"usage,inbecomingaccepted,leadstounforeseenconsequences,triggeringknock-oneffectsandextendedsequencesofchange.Paradoxically,grammarevolvesbecause,inthefinalanalysis,humanscarelessaboutgrammaticalnicetiesthanaboutmakingthemselvesunderstood.[141]Ifthisishowgrammarevolvestoday,accordingtothisschoolofthought,similarprinciplesatworkcanbelegitimatelyinferredamongdistanthumanancestors,whengrammaritselfwasfirstbeingestablished.[142][143][144] Inordertoreconstructtheevolutionarytransitionfromearlylanguagetolanguageswithcomplexgrammars,itisnecessarytoknowwhichhypotheticalsequencesareplausibleandwhicharenot.Inordertoconveyabstractideas,thefirstrecourseofspeakersistofallbackonimmediatelyrecognizableconcreteimagery,veryoftendeployingmetaphorsrooted[colloquialism]insharedbodilyexperience.[145]Afamiliarexampleistheuseofconcretetermssuchas"belly"or"back"toconveyabstractmeaningssuchas"inside"or"behind".Equallymetaphoricalisthestrategyofrepresentingtemporalpatternsonthemodelofspatialones.Forexample,Englishspeakersmightsay"Itisgoingtorain",modelledon"IamgoingtoLondon."Thiscanbeabbreviatedcolloquiallyto"It'sgonnarain."Evenwheninahurry,Englishspeakersdonotsay"I'mgonnaLondon"—thecontractionisrestrictedtothejobofspecifyingtense.Fromsuchexamplesitcanbeseenwhygrammaticalisationisconsistentlyunidirectional—fromconcretetoabstractmeaning,nottheotherwayaround.[142] Grammaticalisationtheoristspictureearlylanguageassimple,perhapsconsistingonlyofnouns.[144]p. 111Evenunderthatextremetheoreticalassumption,however,itisdifficulttoimaginewhatwouldrealisticallyhavepreventedpeoplefromusing,say,"spear"asifitwereaverb("Spearthatpig!").Peoplemighthaveusedtheirnounsasverbsortheirverbsasnounsasoccasiondemanded.Inshort,whileanoun-onlylanguagemightseemtheoreticallypossible,grammaticalisationtheoryindicatesthatitcannothaveremainedfixedinthatstateforanylengthoftime.[142][146] Creativitydrivesgrammaticalchange.[146]Thispresupposesacertainattitudeonthepartoflisteners.Insteadofpunishingdeviationsfromacceptedusage,listenersmustprioritiseimaginativemind-reading.Imaginativecreativity—emittingaleopardalarmwhennoleopardwaspresent,forexample—isnotthekindofbehaviourwhich,say,vervetmonkeyswouldappreciateorreward.[147]Creativityandreliabilityareincompatibledemands;for"Machiavellian"primatesasforanimalsgenerally,theoverridingpressureistodemonstratereliability.[148]Ifhumansescapetheseconstraints,itisbecauseintheircase,listenersareprimarilyinterestedinmentalstates. Tofocusonmentalstatesistoacceptfictions—inhabitantsoftheimagination—aspotentiallyinformativeandinteresting.Anexampleismetaphor:ametaphoris,literally,afalsestatement.[149]InRomeoandJuliet,Romeodeclares"Julietisthesun!".Julietisawoman,notaballofplasmainthesky,buthumanlistenersarenot(ornotusually)pedantsinsistentonpoint-by-pointfactualaccuracy.Theywanttoknowwhatthespeakerhasinmind.Grammaticalisationisessentiallybasedonmetaphor.Tooutlawitsusewouldbetostopgrammarfromevolvingand,bythesametoken,toexcludeallpossibilityofexpressingabstractthought.[145][150] Acriticismofallthisisthatwhilegrammaticalisationtheorymightexplainlanguagechangetoday,itdoesnotsatisfactorilyaddressthereallydifficultchallenge—explainingtheinitialtransitionfromprimate-stylecommunicationtolanguageasitisknowntoday.Rather,thetheoryassumesthatlanguagealreadyexists.AsBerndHeineandTaniaKutevaacknowledge:"Grammaticalisationrequiresalinguisticsystemthatisusedregularlyandfrequentlywithinacommunityofspeakersandispassedonfromonegroupofspeakerstoanother".[144]Outsidemodernhumans,suchconditionsdonotprevail. Evolution-progressionmodel[edit] Humanlanguageisusedforself-expression;however,expressiondisplaysdifferentstages.Theconsciousnessofselfandfeelingsrepresentsthestageimmediatelypriortotheexternal,phoneticexpressionoffeelingsintheformofsound,i.e.,language.Intelligentanimalssuchasdolphins,Eurasianmagpies,andchimpanzeesliveincommunities,whereintheyassignthemselvesrolesforgroupsurvivalandshowemotionssuchassympathy.[151]Whensuchanimalsviewtheirreflection(mirrortest),theyrecognisethemselvesandexhibitself-consciousness.[152]Notably,humansevolvedinaquitedifferentenvironmentthanthatoftheseanimals.Humansurvivalbecameeasierwiththedevelopmentoftools,shelter,andfire,thusfacilitatingfurtheradvancementofsocialinteraction,self-expression,andtool-making,asforhuntingandgathering.[153]TheincreasingbrainsizeallowedadvancedprovisioningandtoolsandthetechnologicaladvancesduringthePalaeolithicerathatbuiltuponthepreviousevolutionaryinnovationsofbipedalismandhandversatilityallowedthedevelopmentofhumanlanguage.[citationneeded] Self-domesticatedapetheory[edit] Accordingtoastudyinvestigatingthesongdifferencesbetweenwhite-rumpedmuniasanditsdomesticatedcounterpart(Bengalesefinch),thewildmuniasuseahighlystereotypedsongsequence,whereasthedomesticatedonessingahighlyunconstrainedsong.Inwildfinches,songsyntaxissubjecttofemalepreference—sexualselection—andremainsrelativelyfixed.However,intheBengalesefinch,naturalselectionisreplacedbybreeding,inthiscaseforcolourfulplumage,andthus,decoupledfromselectivepressures,stereotypedsongsyntaxisallowedtodrift.Itisreplaced,supposedlywithin1000generations,byavariableandlearnedsequence.Wildfinches,moreover,arethoughtincapableoflearningsongsequencesfromotherfinches.[154]Inthefieldofbirdvocalisation,brainscapableofproducingonlyaninnatesonghaveverysimpleneuralpathways:theprimaryforebrainmotorcentre,calledtherobustnucleusofarcopallium,connectstomidbrainvocaloutputs,whichinturnprojecttobrainstemmotornuclei.Bycontrast,inbrainscapableoflearningsongs,thearcopalliumreceivesinputfromnumerousadditionalforebrainregions,includingthoseinvolvedinlearningandsocialexperience.Controloversonggenerationhasbecomelessconstrained,moredistributed,andmoreflexible.[154] Onewaytothinkabouthumanevolutionisthathumansareself-domesticatedapes.Justasdomesticationrelaxedselectionforstereotypicsongsinthefinches—matechoicewassupplantedbychoicesmadebytheaestheticsensibilitiesofbirdbreedersandtheircustomers—somighthumanculturaldomesticationhaverelaxedselectiononmanyoftheirprimatebehaviouraltraits,allowingoldpathwaystodegenerateandreconfigure.Giventhehighlyindeterminatewaythatmammalianbrainsdevelop—theybasicallyconstructthemselves"bottomup",withonesetofneuronalinteractionspreparingforthenextroundofinteractions—degradedpathwayswouldtendtoseekoutandfindnewopportunitiesforsynaptichookups.Suchinheritedde-differentiationsofbrainpathwaysmighthavecontributedtothefunctionalcomplexitythatcharacteriseshumanlanguage.And,asexemplifiedbythefinches,suchde-differentiationscanoccurinveryrapidtime-frames.[155] Speechandlanguageforcommunication[edit] Seealso:Animalcommunication,Animallanguage,andOriginofspeech Adistinctioncanbedrawnbetweenspeechandlanguage.Languageisnotnecessarilyspoken:itmightalternativelybewrittenorsigned.Speechisamonganumberofdifferentmethodsofencodingandtransmittinglinguisticinformation,albeitarguablythemostnaturalone.[156] Somescholars[likewhom?]viewlanguageasaninitiallycognitivedevelopment,its"externalisation"toservecommunicativepurposesoccurringlaterinhumanevolution.Accordingtoonesuchschoolofthought,thekeyfeaturedistinguishinghumanlanguageisrecursion,[157](inthiscontext,theiterativeembeddingofphraseswithinphrases).Otherscholars—notablyDanielEverett—denythatrecursionisuniversal,citingcertainlanguages(e.g.Pirahã)whichallegedlylackthisfeature.[158] Theabilitytoaskquestionsisconsideredbysome[likewhom?]todistinguishlanguagefromnon-humansystemsofcommunication.[159]Somecaptiveprimates(notablybonobosandchimpanzees),havinglearnedtouserudimentarysigningtocommunicatewiththeirhumantrainers,provedabletorespondcorrectlytocomplexquestionsandrequests.Yettheyfailedtoaskeventhesimplestquestionsthemselves.[160]Conversely,humanchildrenareabletoasktheirfirstquestions(usingonlyquestionintonation)atthebabblingperiodoftheirdevelopment,longbeforetheystartusingsyntacticstructures.Althoughbabiesfromdifferentculturesacquirenativelanguagesfromtheirsocialenvironment,alllanguagesoftheworldwithoutexception—tonal,non-tonal,intonationalandaccented—usesimilarrising"questionintonation"foryes–noquestions.[161][162]Thisfactisastrongevidenceoftheuniversalityofquestionintonation.Ingeneral,accordingtosomeauthors,sentenceintonation/pitchispivotalinspokengrammarandisthebasicinformationusedbychildrentolearnthegrammarofwhateverlanguage.[14] Cognitivedevelopmentandlanguage[edit] Languageusershavehigh-levelreference(ordeixis),theabilitytorefertothingsorstatesofbeingthatarenotintheimmediaterealmofthespeaker.Thisabilityisoftenrelatedtotheoryofmind,oranawarenessoftheotherasabeingliketheselfwithindividualwantsandintentions.AccordingtoChomsky,HauserandFitch(2002),therearesixmainaspectsofthishigh-levelreferencesystem: Theoryofmind Capacitytoacquirenon-linguisticconceptualrepresentations,suchastheobject/kinddistinction Referentialvocalsignals Imitationasarational,intentionalsystem Voluntarycontroloversignalproductionasevidenceofintentionalcommunication Numberrepresentation[157] Theoryofmind[edit] Mainarticle:Theoryofmind SimonBaron-Cohen(1999)arguesthattheoryofmindmusthaveprecededlanguageuse,basedonevidenceofuseofthefollowingcharacteristicsasmuchas40,000yearsago:intentionalcommunication,repairingfailedcommunication,teaching,intentionalpersuasion,intentionaldeception,buildingsharedplansandgoals,intentionalsharingoffocusortopic,andpretending.Moreover,Baron-Cohenarguesthatmanyprimatesshowsome,butnotall,oftheseabilities.[citationneeded]CallandTomasello'sresearchonchimpanzeessupportsthis,inthatindividualchimpsseemtounderstandthatotherchimpshaveawareness,knowledge,andintention,butdonotseemtounderstandfalsebeliefs.Manyprimatesshowsometendenciestowardatheoryofmind,butnotafulloneashumanshave.[163] Ultimately,thereissomeconsensuswithinthefieldthatatheoryofmindisnecessaryforlanguageuse.Thus,thedevelopmentofafulltheoryofmindinhumanswasanecessaryprecursortofulllanguageuse.[164] Numberrepresentation[edit] Inoneparticularstudy,ratsandpigeonswererequiredtopressabuttonacertainnumberoftimestogetfood.Theanimalsshowedveryaccuratedistinctionfornumberslessthanfour,butasthenumbersincreased,theerrorrateincreased.[157]Inanother,theprimatologistTetsuroMatsuzawaattemptedtoteachchimpanzeesArabicnumerals.[165]Thedifferencebetweenprimatesandhumansinthisregardwasverylarge,asittookthechimpsthousandsoftrialstolearn1–9,witheachnumberrequiringasimilaramountoftrainingtime;yet,afterlearningthemeaningof1,2and3(andsometimes4),children(aftertheageof5.5to6)easilycomprehendthevalueofgreaterintegersbyusingasuccessorfunction(i.e.2is1greaterthan1,3is1greaterthan2,4is1greaterthan3;once4isreacheditseemsmostchildrensuddenlyunderstandthatthevalueofanyintegernis1greaterthanthepreviousinteger).[166]Putsimply,otherprimateslearnthemeaningofnumbersonebyone,similartotheirapproachtootherreferentialsymbols,whilechildrenfirstlearnanarbitrarylistofsymbols(1,2,3,4...)andthenlaterlearntheirprecisemeanings.[167]Theseresultscanbeseenasevidencefortheapplicationofthe"open-endedgenerativeproperty"oflanguageinhumannumeralcognition.[157] Linguisticstructures[edit] Lexical-phonologicalprinciple[edit] Hockett(1966)detailsalistoffeaturesregardedasessentialtodescribinghumanlanguage.[168]Inthedomainofthelexical-phonologicalprinciple,twofeaturesofthislistaremostimportant: Productivity:userscancreateandunderstandcompletelynovelmessages. Newmessagesarefreelycoinedbyblending,analogizingfrom,ortransformingoldones. Eitherneworoldelementsarefreelyassignednewsemanticloadsbycircumstancesandcontext.Thissaysthatineverylanguage,newidiomsconstantlycomeintoexistence. Duality(ofPatterning):alargenumberofmeaningfulelementsaremadeupofaconvenientlysmallnumberofindependentlymeaninglessyetmessage-differentiatingelements. Thesoundsystemofalanguageiscomposedofafinitesetofsimplephonologicalitems.Underthespecificphonotacticrulesofagivenlanguage,theseitemscanberecombinedandconcatenated,givingrisetomorphologyandtheopen-endedlexicon.Akeyfeatureoflanguageisthatasimple,finitesetofphonologicalitemsgivesrisetoaninfinitelexicalsystemwhereinrulesdeterminetheformofeachitem,andmeaningisinextricablylinkedwithform.Phonologicalsyntax,then,isasimplecombinationofpre-existingphonologicalunits.Relatedtothisisanotheressentialfeatureofhumanlanguage:lexicalsyntax,whereinpre-existingunitsarecombined,givingrisetosemanticallynovelordistinctlexicalitems.[citationsneeded] Certainelementsofthelexical-phonologicalprincipleareknowntoexistoutsideofhumans.Whileall(ornearlyall)havebeendocumentedinsomeforminthenaturalworld,veryfewcoexistwithinthesamespecies.Bird-song,singingnonhumanapes,andthesongsofwhalesalldisplayphonologicalsyntax,combiningunitsofsoundintolargerstructuresapparentlydevoidofenhancedornovelmeaning.Certainotherprimatespeciesdohavesimplephonologicalsystemswithunitsreferringtoentitiesintheworld.However,incontrasttohumansystems,theunitsintheseprimates'systemsnormallyoccurinisolation,betrayingalackoflexicalsyntax.Thereisnew[when?]evidencetosuggestthatCampbell'smonkeysalsodisplaylexicalsyntax,combiningtwocalls(apredatoralarmcallwitha"boom",thecombinationofwhichdenotesalessenedthreatofdanger),howeveritisstillunclearwhetherthisisalexicaloramorphologicalphenomenon.[169] Pidginsandcreoles[edit] Mainarticles:Creolelanguageandpidgin Pidginsaresignificantlysimplifiedlanguageswithonlyrudimentarygrammarandarestrictedvocabulary.Intheirearlystage,pidginsmainlyconsistofnouns,verbs,andadjectiveswithfewornoarticles,prepositions,conjunctionsorauxiliaryverbs.Oftenthegrammarhasnofixedwordorderandthewordshavenoinflection.[170] Ifcontactismaintainedbetweenthegroupsspeakingthepidginforlongperiodsoftime,thepidginsmaybecomemorecomplexovermanygenerations.Ifthechildrenofonegenerationadoptthepidginastheirnativelanguageitdevelopsintoacreolelanguage,whichbecomesfixedandacquiresamorecomplexgrammar,withfixedphonology,syntax,morphology,andsyntacticembedding.Thesyntaxandmorphologyofsuchlanguagesmayoftenhavelocalinnovationsnotobviouslyderivedfromanyoftheparentlanguages. Studiesofcreolelanguagesaroundtheworldhavesuggestedthattheydisplayremarkablesimilaritiesingrammar[citationneeded]andaredevelopeduniformlyfrompidginsinasinglegeneration.Thesesimilaritiesareapparentevenwhencreolesdonothaveanycommonlanguageorigins.Inaddition,creolesaresimilar,despitebeingdevelopedinisolationfromeachother.Syntacticsimilaritiesincludesubject–verb–objectwordorder.EvenwhencreolesarederivedfromlanguageswithadifferentwordordertheyoftendeveloptheSVOwordorder.Creolestendtohavesimilarusagepatternsfordefiniteandindefinitearticles,andsimilarmovementrulesforphrasestructuresevenwhentheparentlanguagesdonot.[170] Evolutionarytimeline[edit] HominintimelineThisbox:viewtalkedit−10 —–−9 —–−8 —–−7 —–−6 —–−5 —–−4 —–−3 —–−2 —–−1 —–0 —MiocenePliocenePleistoceneHomininiNakalipithecusOuranopithecusOreopithecusSahelanthropusOrrorinArdipithecusAustralopithecusHomohabilisHomoerectusHomobodoensisHomosapiensNeanderthals,Denisovans←Earlierapes←Gorillasplit←Chimpanzeesplit←Earliestbipedal←Earlieststonetools←DispersalbeyondAfrica←Earliestfire/cooking←Earliestclothes←ModernhumansHominids(millionyearsago) Primatecommunication[edit] Fieldprimatologistscangiveusefulinsightsintogreatapecommunicationinthewild.[30]Animportant[accordingtowhom?]findingisthatnonhumanprimates,includingtheothergreatapes,producecallsthataregraded,asopposedtocategoricallydifferentiated,withlistenersstrivingtoevaluatesubtlegradationsinsignallers'emotionalandbodilystates.Nonhumanapesseeminglyfinditextremelydifficulttoproducevocalisationsintheabsenceofthecorrespondingemotionalstates.[45]Incaptivity,nonhumanapeshavebeentaughtrudimentaryformsofsignlanguageorhavebeenpersuadedtouselexigrams—symbolsthatdonotgraphicallyresemblethecorrespondingwords—oncomputerkeyboards.Somenonhumanapes,suchasKanzi,havebeenabletolearnandusehundredsoflexigrams.[171][172] TheBroca'sandWernicke'sareasintheprimatebrainareresponsibleforcontrollingthemusclesoftheface,tongue,mouth,andlarynx,aswellasrecognizingsounds.Primatesareknowntomake"vocalcalls",andthesecallsaregeneratedbycircuitsinthebrainstemandlimbicsystem.[173] Inthewild,thecommunicationofvervetmonkeyshasbeenthemostextensivelystudied.[170]Theyareknowntomakeuptotendifferentvocalizations.Manyoftheseareusedtowarnothermembersofthegroupaboutapproachingpredators.Theyincludea"leopardcall",a"snakecall",andan"eaglecall".[174]Eachcalltriggersadifferentdefensivestrategyinthemonkeyswhohearthecallandscientistswereabletoelicitpredictableresponsesfromthemonkeysusingloudspeakersandprerecordedsounds.Othervocalisationsmaybeusedforidentification.Ifaninfantmonkeycalls,itsmotherturnstowardit,butothervervetmothersturninsteadtowardthatinfant'smothertoseewhatshewilldo.[175][176] Similarly,researchershavedemonstratedthatchimpanzees(incaptivity)usedifferent"words"inreferencetodifferentfoods.Theyrecordedvocalisationsthatchimpsmadeinreference,forexample,tograpes,andthenotherchimpspointedatpicturesofgrapeswhentheyheardtherecordedsound.[177][178] Ardipithecusramidus[edit] AstudypublishedinHOMO:JournalofComparativeHumanBiologyin2017claimsthatArdipithecusramidus,ahominindatedatapproximately4.5Ma,showsthefirstevidenceofananatomicalshiftinthehomininlineagesuggestiveofincreasedvocalcapability.[179]ThisstudycomparedtheskullofA.ramiduswith29chimpanzeeskullsofdifferentagesandfoundthatinnumerousfeaturesA.ramidusclusteredwiththeinfantandjuvenilemeasuresasopposedtotheadultmeasures.Significantly,[accordingtowhom?]suchaffinitywiththeshapedimensionsofinfantandjuvenilechimpanzeeskullarchitecture,itwasargued,mayhaveresultedingreatervocalcapability.Thisassertionwasbasedonthenotionthatthechimpanzeevocaltractratiosthatpreventspeecharearesultofgrowthfactorsassociatedwithpuberty—growthfactorsabsentinA.ramidusontogeny.A.ramiduswasalsofoundtohaveadegreeofcervicallordosismoreconducivetovocalmodulationwhencomparedwithchimpanzeesaswellascranialbasearchitecturesuggestiveofincreasedvocalcapability. Whatwassignificantinthisstudy[accordingtowhom?]wastheobservationthatthechangesinskullarchitecturethatcorrelatewithreducedaggressionarethesamechangesnecessaryfortheevolutionofearlyhomininvocalability.Inintegratingdataonanatomicalcorrelatesofprimatematingandsocialsystemswithstudiesofskullandvocaltractarchitecturethatfacilitatespeechproduction,theauthorsarguethatpaleoanthropologiststodate[when?]havefailedtounderstandtheimportantrelationshipbetweenearlyhomininsocialevolutionandlanguagecapacity. WhiletheskullofA.ramidus,accordingtotheauthors,lackstheanatomicalimpedimentstospeechevidentinchimpanzees,itisunclearwhatthevocalcapabilitiesofthisearlyhomininwere.WhiletheysuggestA.ramidus—basedonsimilarvocaltractratios—mayhavehadvocalcapabilitiesequivalenttoamodernhumaninfantorveryyoungchild,theyconcedethisisobviouslyadebatableandspeculativehypothesis.However,theydoclaimthatchangesinskullarchitecturethroughprocessesofsocialselectionwereanecessaryprerequisiteforlanguageevolution.Astheywrite: WeproposethatasaresultofpaedomorphicmorphogenesisofthecranialbaseandcraniofacialmorphologyAr.ramiduswouldhavenotbeenlimitedintermsofthemechanicalcomponentsofspeechproductionaschimpanzeesandbonobosare.ItispossiblethatAr.ramidushadvocalcapabilityapproximatingthatofchimpanzeesandbonobos,withitsidiosyncraticskullmorphologynotresultinginanysignificantadvancesinspeechcapability.Inthissensetheanatomicalfeaturesanalysedinthisessaywouldhavebeenexaptedinlatermorevolublespeciesofhominin.However,giventheselectiveadvantagesofpro-socialvocalsynchrony,wesuggestthespecieswouldhavedevelopedsignificantlymorecomplexvocalabilitiesthanchimpanzeesandbonobos.[179] EarlyHomo[edit] Anatomically,somescholarsbelievethatfeaturesofbipedalismdevelopedintheaustralopithecinesaround3.5millionyearsago.Aroundthistime,thesestructuraldevelopmentswithintheskullledtoamoreprominentlyL-shapedvocaltract.[180][page needed]Inordertogeneratethesoundsmodernhomosapiensarecapableofmaking,suchasvowels,itisvitalthatEarlyHomopopulationsmusthaveaspecificallyshapedvoicetrackandalowersittinglarynx.[181]OpposingresearchpreviouslysuggestedthatNeanderthalswerephysicallyincapableofcreatingthefullrangeofvocalsseeninmodernhumansduetothedifferencesinlarynxplacement.EstablishingdistinctlarynxpositionsthroughfossilremainsofHomosapiensandNeanderthalswouldsupportthistheory;however,modernresearchhasrevealedthatthehyoidbonewasindistinguishablefromthetwopopulations.Thoughresearchhasshownalowersittinglarynxisimportanttoproducingspeech,anothertheorystatesitmaynotbeasimportantasoncethought.[182]Cataldo,Migliano,&Vinicius(2018)statedthatspeechmayhaveemergedduetoanincreaseintradeandcommunicationbetweendifferentgroups.AnotherviewbyCataldostatesthatspeechwasevolvedtoenabletool-makingbytheNeanderthals.[183] ArchaicHomosapiens[edit] "Hmmmmm"redirectshere.ForHumming,seeHumming(disambiguation). Furtherinformation:Archaichumans StevenMithenproposedthetermHmmmmmforthepre-linguisticsystemofcommunicationpositedtohavebeenusedbyarchaicHomo,beginningwithHomoergasterandreachingthehighestsophisticationintheMiddlePleistocenewithHomoheidelbergensisandHomoneanderthalensis.Hmmmmmisanacronymforholistic(non-compositional),manipulative(utterancesarecommandsorsuggestions,notdescriptivestatements),multi-modal(acousticaswellasgesturalandfacial),musical,andmimetic.[184] Homoerectus EvidenceforHomoerectuspotentiallyusinglanguagecomesintheformofAcheuleantoolusage.TheuseofabstractthoughtintheformationofAcheuleanhandaxescoincideswiththesymbolcreationnecessaryforsimplelanguage.[185]Recentlanguagetheoriespresentrecursionastheuniquefacetofhumanlanguageandtheoryofmind.[186][187]However,breakingdownlanguageintoitssymbolicparts:separatingmeaningfromtherequirementsofgrammar,itbecomespossibletoseethatlanguagedoesnotdependoneitherrecursionorgrammar.ThiscanbeevidencedbythePirahãlanguageusersinBrazilthathavenomythorcreationstories,nonumbersandnocolorswithintheirlanguage.[188]Thisistohighlightthateventhoughgrammarmayhavebeenunavailable,useofforesight,planningandsymbolicthoughtcanbeevidenceoflanguageasearlyasonemillionyearsagowithHomoerectus. Homoheidelbergensis[edit] Seealso:Homoheidelbergensis:Language Homoheidelbergensiswasacloserelative(mostprobablyamigratorydescendant)ofHomoergaster.Someresearchersbelievethisspeciestobethefirsthominintomakecontrolledvocalisations,possiblymimickinganimalvocalisations,[184]andthatasHomoheidelbergensisdevelopedmoresophisticatedculture,proceededfromthispointandpossiblydevelopedanearlyformofsymboliclanguage. Homoneanderthalensis[edit] Seealso:Neanderthalbehavior:Language Thediscoveryin1989ofthe(Neanderthal)Kebara2hyoidbonesuggeststhatNeanderthalsmayhavebeenanatomicallycapableofproducingsoundssimilartomodernhumans.[189][190]Thehypoglossalnerve,whichpassesthroughthehypoglossalcanal,controlsthemovementsofthetongue,whichmayhaveenabledvoicingforsizeexaggeration(seesizeexaggerationhypothesisbelow)ormayreflectspeechabilities.[25][191][192][193][194][195] However,althoughNeanderthalsmayhavebeenanatomicallyabletospeak,RichardG.Kleinin2004doubtedthattheypossessedafullymodernlanguage.Helargelybaseshisdoubtsonthefossilrecordofarchaichumansandtheirstonetoolkit.BartdeBoerin2017acknowledgesthisambiguityofauniversallyacceptedNeanderthalvocaltract;however,henotesthesimilaritiesinthethoracicvertebralcanal,potentialairsacs,andhyoidbonesbetweenmodernhumansandNeanderthalstosuggestthepresenceofcomplexspeech.[196]FortwomillionyearsfollowingtheemergenceofHomohabilis,thestonetooltechnologyofhomininschangedverylittle.Klein,whohasworkedextensivelyonancientstonetools,describesthecrudestonetoolkitofarchaichumansasimpossibletobreakdownintocategoriesbasedontheirfunction,andreportsthatNeanderthalsseemtohavehadlittleconcernforthefinalaestheticformoftheirtools.KleinarguesthattheNeanderthalbrainmayhavenotreachedthelevelofcomplexityrequiredformodernspeech,evenifthephysicalapparatusforspeechproductionwaswell-developed.[197][198]TheissueoftheNeanderthal'slevelofculturalandtechnologicalsophisticationremainsacontroversialone.[citationneeded] Basedoncomputersimulationsusedtoevaluatethatevolutionoflanguagethatresultedinshowingthreestagesintheevolutionofsyntax,Neanderthalsarethoughttohavebeeninstage2,showingtheyhadsomethingmoreevolvedthanproto-languagebutnotquiteascomplexasthelanguageofmodernhumans.[199] Someresearchers,applyingauditorybioengineeringmodelstocomputerisedtomographyscansofNeanderthalskulls,haveassertedthatNeanderthalshadauditorycapacityverysimilartothatofanatomicallymodernhumans.[200]Theseresearchersclaimthatthisfindingimpliesthat"Neanderthalsevolvedtheauditorycapacitiestosupportavocalcommunicationsystemasefficientasmodernhumanspeech."[200] Homosapiens[edit] Seealso:AnatomicallymodernhumansandBehavioralmodernity AnatomicallymodernhumansbegintoappearinthefossilrecordinEthiopiasome200,000yearsago.[201]AlthoughthereisstillmuchdebateastowhetherbehaviouralmodernityemergedinAfricaataroundthesametime,agrowingnumberofarchaeologistsnowadays[when?]invokethesouthernAfricanMiddleStoneAgeuseofredochrepigments—forexampleatBlombosCave—asevidencethatmodernanatomyandbehaviourco-evolved.[202]Thesearchaeologistsarguestronglythatifmodernhumansatthisearlystagewereusingredochrepigmentsforritualandsymbolicpurposes,theyprobablyhadsymboliclanguageaswell.[27] AccordingtotherecentAfricanoriginshypothesis,fromaround60,000–50,000yearsago[203]agroupofhumansleftAfricaandbeganmigratingtooccupytherestoftheworld,carryinglanguageandsymbolicculturewiththem.[204] Thedescendedlarynx[edit] Thissectionneedsadditionalcitationsforverification.Pleasehelpimprovethisarticlebyaddingcitationstoreliablesources.Unsourcedmaterialmaybechallengedandremoved.(May2021)(Learnhowandwhentoremovethistemplatemessage) Thelarynxorvoiceboxisanorganintheneckhousingthevocalfolds,whichareresponsibleforphonation.Inhumans,thelarynxisdescended.Thehumanspeciesisnotuniqueinthisrespect:goats,dogs,pigsandtamarinslowerthelarynxtemporarily,toemitloudcalls.[205]Severaldeerspecieshaveapermanentlyloweredlarynx,whichmaybeloweredstillfurtherbymalesduringtheirroaringdisplays.[206]Lions,jaguars,cheetahsanddomesticcatsalsodothis.[207]However,laryngealdescentinnonhumans(accordingtoPhilipLieberman)isnotaccompaniedbydescentofthehyoid;hencethetongueremainshorizontalintheoralcavity,preventingitfromactingasapharyngealarticulator.[208] LarynxAnatomyofthelarynx,anterolateralviewAnatomicalterminology[editonWikidata] Despiteallthis,scholarsremaindividedastohow"special"thehumanvocaltractreallyis.Ithasbeenshownthatthelarynxdoesdescendtosomeextentduringdevelopmentinchimpanzees,followedbyhyoidaldescent.[209]Asagainstthis,PhilipLiebermanpointsoutthatonlyhumanshaveevolvedpermanentandsubstantiallaryngealdescentinassociationwithhyoidaldescent,resultinginacurvedtongueandtwo-tubevocaltractwith1:1proportions.HearguesthatNeanderthalsandearlyanatomicallymodernhumanscouldnothavepossessedsupralaryngealvocaltractscapableofproducing"fullyhumanspeech".[210]Uniquelyinthehumancase,simplecontactbetweentheepiglottisandvelumisnolongerpossible,disruptingthenormalmammalianseparationoftherespiratoryanddigestivetractsduringswallowing.Sincethisentailssubstantialcosts—increasingtheriskofchokingwhileswallowingfood—weareforcedtoaskwhatbenefitsmighthaveoutweighedthosecosts.Theobviousbenefit—soitisclaimed—musthavebeenspeech.Butthisideahasbeenvigorouslycontested.Oneobjectionisthathumansareinfactnotseriouslyatriskofchokingonfood:medicalstatisticsindicatethataccidentsofthiskindareextremelyrare.[211]Anotherobjectionisthatintheviewofmostscholars,speechasitisknownemergedrelativelylateinhumanevolution,roughlycontemporaneouslywiththeemergenceofHomosapiens.[32]Adevelopmentascomplexasthereconfigurationofthehumanvocaltractwouldhaverequiredmuchmoretime,implyinganearlydateoforigin.Thisdiscrepancyintimescalesunderminestheideathathumanvocalflexibilitywasinitiallydrivenbyselectionpressuresforspeech,thusnotexcludingthatitwasselectedfore.g.improvedsingingability. Thesizeexaggerationhypothesis[edit] Tolowerthelarynxistoincreasethelengthofthevocaltract,inturnloweringformantfrequenciessothatthevoicesounds"deeper"—givinganimpressionofgreatersize.JohnOhalaarguesthatthefunctionoftheloweredlarynxinhumans,especiallymales,isprobablytoenhancethreatdisplaysratherthanspeechitself.[212]Ohalapointsoutthatiftheloweredlarynxwereanadaptationforspeech,adulthumanmaleswouldbeexpectedtobebetteradaptedinthisrespectthanadultfemales,whoselarynxisconsiderablylesslow.However,femalesoutperformmalesinverbaltests,[213]falsifyingthiswholelineofreasoning. W.TecumsehFitchlikewisearguesthatthiswastheoriginalselectiveadvantageoflaryngealloweringinthehumanspecies.Although(accordingtoFitch)theinitialloweringofthelarynxinhumanshadnothingtodowithspeech,theincreasedrangeofpossibleformantpatternswassubsequentlyco-optedforspeech.Sizeexaggerationremainsthesolefunctionoftheextremelaryngealdescentobservedinmaledeer.Consistentwiththesizeexaggerationhypothesis,aseconddescentofthelarynxoccursatpubertyinhumans,althoughonlyinmales.Inresponsetotheobjectionthatthelarynxisdescendedinhumanfemales,Fitchsuggeststhatmothersvocalizingtoprotecttheirinfantswouldalsohavebenefitedfromthisability.[214] Phonemicdiversity[edit] In2011,QuentinAtkinsonpublishedasurveyofphonemesfrom500differentlanguagesaswellaslanguagefamiliesandcomparedtheirphonemicdiversitybyregion,numberofspeakersanddistancefromAfrica.ThesurveyrevealedthatAfricanlanguageshadthelargestnumberofphonemes,andOceaniaandSouthAmericahadthesmallestnumber.Afterallowingforthenumberofspeakers,thephonemicdiversitywascomparedtoover2000possibleoriginlocations.Atkinson's"bestfit"modelisthatlanguageoriginatedincentralandsouthernAfricabetween80,000and160,000yearsago.ThispredatesthehypothesizedsoutherncoastalpeoplingofArabia,India,southeastAsia,andAustralia.Itwouldalsomeanthattheoriginoflanguageoccurredatthesametimeastheemergenceofsymbolicculture.[11] History[edit] Inreligionandmythology[edit] Mainarticle:Mythicaloriginsoflanguage Seealso:DivinelanguageandAdamiclanguage Thesearchfortheoriginoflanguagehasalonghistoryinmythology.Mostmythologiesdonotcredithumanswiththeinventionoflanguagebutspeakofadivinelanguagepredatinghumanlanguage.Mysticallanguagesusedtocommunicatewithanimalsorspirits,suchasthelanguageofthebirds,arealsocommon,andwereofparticularinterestduringtheRenaissance. VācistheHindugoddessofspeech,or"speechpersonified".AsBrahman's"sacredutterance",shehasacosmologicalroleasthe"MotheroftheVedas".TheAztecs'storymaintainsthatonlyaman,Coxcox,andawoman,Xochiquetzal,survivedaflood,havingfloatedonapieceofbark.Theyfoundthemselvesonlandandhadmanychildrenwhowereatfirstbornunabletospeak,butsubsequently,uponthearrivalofadove,wereendowedwithlanguage,althougheachonewasgivenadifferentspeechsuchthattheycouldnotunderstandoneanother.[215] IntheOldTestament,theBookofGenesis(11)saysthatGodpreventedtheTowerofBabelfrombeingcompletedthroughamiraclethatmadeitsconstructionworkersstartspeakingdifferentlanguages.Afterthis,theymigratedtootherregions,groupedtogetheraccordingtowhichofthenewlycreatedlanguagestheyspoke,explainingtheoriginsoflanguagesandnationsoutsideoftheFertileCrescent.[216] Historicalexperiments[edit] Mainarticle:Languagedeprivationexperiments Historycontainsanumberofanecdotesaboutpeoplewhoattemptedtodiscovertheoriginoflanguagebyexperiment.ThefirstsuchtalewastoldbyHerodotus(Histories2.2).HerelatesthatPharaohPsammetichus(probablyPsammetichusI,7thcenturyBC)hadtwochildrenraisedbyashepherd,withtheinstructionsthatnooneshouldspeaktothem,butthattheshepherdshouldfeedandcareforthemwhilelisteningtodeterminetheirfirstwords.Whenoneofthechildrencried"bekos"withoutstretchedarmstheshepherdconcludedthatthewordwasPhrygian,becausethatwasthesoundofthePhrygianwordfor"bread".Fromthis,PsammetichusconcludedthatthefirstlanguagewasPhrygian.KingJamesVofScotlandissaidtohavetriedasimilarexperiment;hischildrenweresupposedtohavespokenHebrew.[217] BoththemedievalmonarchFrederickIIandAkbararesaidtohavetriedsimilarexperiments;thechildreninvolvedintheseexperimentsdidnotspeak.Thecurrentsituationofdeafpeoplealsopointsintothisdirection.[clarificationneeded] Historyofresearch[edit] Mainarticle:Evolutionarylinguistics Modernlinguisticsdidnotbeginuntilthelate18thcentury,andtheRomanticoranimistthesesofJohannGottfriedHerderandJohannChristophAdelungremainedinfluentialwellintothe19thcentury.Thequestionoflanguageoriginseemedinaccessibletomethodicalapproaches,andin1866theLinguisticSocietyofParisfamouslybannedalldiscussionoftheoriginoflanguage,deemingittobeanunanswerableproblem.Anincreasinglysystematicapproachtohistoricallinguisticsdevelopedinthecourseofthe19thcentury,reachingitsculminationintheNeogrammarianschoolofKarlBrugmannandothers.[citationneeded] However,scholarlyinterestinthequestionoftheoriginoflanguagehasonlygraduallybeenrekindled[colloquialism]fromthe1950son(andthencontroversially)withideassuchasuniversalgrammar,masscomparisonandglottochronology.[citationneeded] The"originoflanguage"asasubjectinitsownrightemergedfromstudiesinneurolinguistics,psycholinguisticsandhumanevolution.TheLinguisticBibliographyintroduced"Originoflanguage"asaseparateheadingin1988,asasub-topicofpsycholinguistics.Dedicatedresearchinstitutesofevolutionarylinguisticsarearecentphenomenon,emergingonlyinthe1990s.[218] Seealso[edit] Abiogenesis Biolinguistics Bouba/kikieffect Bow-wowtheory Digitalinfinity EssayontheOriginofLanguages Evolutionarypsychologyoflanguage FOXP2andhumanevolution Generativeanthropology Historicallinguistics Neurobiologicaloriginsoflanguage Originsofsociety Originofspeech Proto-language Theoryoflanguage References[edit] ^Hauser,M.D.;Yang,C.;Berwick,R.C.;Tattersall,I.;Ryan,M.J.;Watumull,J.;Chomsky,N.;Lewontin,R.C.(2014)."Themysteryoflanguageevolution".FrontiersinPsychology.5:401.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00401.PMC 4019876.PMID 24847300. ^Stam,J.H.1976.Inquiriesintotheoriginsoflanguage.NewYork:HarperandRow,p.255. ^Tallerman,Maggie;Gibson,KathleenRita(2012).TheOxfordhandbookoflanguageevolution.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-19-954111-9.OCLC 724665645. ^Müller,F.M.1996[1861].Thetheoreticalstage,andtheoriginoflanguage.Lecture9fromLecturesontheScienceofLanguage.ReprintedinR.Harris(ed.),TheOriginofLanguage.Bristol:ThoemmesPress,pp.7–41. ^Christiansen,MortenH;Kirby,Simon(2003).MortenH.Christiansen;SimonKirby(eds.).Languageevolution :thehardestprobleminscience?.Languageevolution.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.pp. 77–93.ISBN 978-0-19-924484-3.OCLC 51235137. ^abcUlbæk,Ib(1998).JamesRHurford;MichaelStuddert-Kennedy;ChrisKnight(eds.).Theoriginoflanguageandcognition.Approachestotheevolutionoflanguage :socialandcognitivebase.Cambridge,UK;NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.pp. 30–43.ISBN 978-0-521-63964-4.OCLC 37742390. ^ Pinker,Steven(1994).Thelanguageinstinct.NewYork:W.MorrowandCo.ISBN 978-0-688-12141-9.OCLC 28723210. ^Tomasello,Michael(1996).BMVelichkovskiĭ;DuaneMRumbaugh;UniversitätBielefeldZentrumfürInterdisziplinäreForschung(eds.).Theculturalrootsoflanguage.Communicatingmeaning :theevolutionanddevelopmentoflanguage.Mahwah,N.J.:L.Erlbaum.ISBN 978-0-8058-2118-5.OCLC 34078362. ^Pika,Simone;Mitani,John(2006)."Referentialgesturalcommunicationinwildchimpanzees(Pantroglodytes)".CurrentBiology.16(6):R191–R192.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.037.ISSN 0960-9822.PMID 16546066.S2CID 2273018. ^Dunn,M.;Greenhill,SJ.;Levinson,SC.;Gray,RD.(May2011)."Evolvedstructureoflanguageshowslineage-specifictrendsinword-orderuniversals".Nature.473(7345):79–82.Bibcode:2011Natur.473...79D.doi:10.1038/nature09923.hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0013-3B19-B.PMID 21490599.S2CID 1588797. ^abcAtkinson,Quentin(2011)."PhonemicDiversitySupportsaSerialFounderEffectModelofLanguageExpansionfromAfrica"(PDF).ScienceMagazine.332(6027):346–349.Bibcode:2011Sci...332..346A.doi:10.1126/science.1199295.PMID 21493858.S2CID 42021647.Retrieved9July2017. ^TheEconomist,"Theevolutionoflanguage:Babelorbabble?",16April2011,pp.85–86. ^Cross,Ian;Woodruff,GhofurEliot(23April2009)."MusicasaCommunicativemedium".InRudolfBotha;ChrisKnight(eds.).ThePrehistoryofLanguage.OUPOxford.pp. 77–98.doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199545872.003.0005.ISBN 978-0-19-156287-7. ^abcVaneechoutte,Mario(2014)."TheOriginofArticulateLanguageRevisited:ThePotentialofaSemi-AquaticPastofHumanAncestorstoExplaintheOriginofHumanMusicalityandArticulateLanguage"(PDF).HumanEvolution.29:1–33. ^Chomsky,N,1996.PowersandProspects.Reflectionsonhumannatureandthesocialorder.London:PlutoPress,p30. ^Knight,Chris;Power,Camilla(2012).MaggieTallerman;KathleenR.Gibson(eds.).Socialconditionsfortheevolutionaryemergenceoflanguage(PDF).TheOxfordhandbookoflanguageevolution.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.pp. 346–49.ISBN 978-0-19-954111-9.OCLC 724665645. ^abRappaport,Roy(1999).Ritualandreligioninthemakingofhumanity.Cambridge,U.K.NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.ISBN 9780521296908.OCLC 848728046. ^abcKnight,C.(2008)."'Honestfakes'andlanguageorigins"(PDF).JournalofConsciousnessStudies.15(10–11):236–48. ^abKnight,Chris(2010).UlrichJFrey;CharlotteStörmer;KaiPWillführ(eds.).Theoriginsofsymbolicculture(PDF).Homonovus :ahumanwithoutillusion.Berlin;NewYork:Springer.pp. 193–211.ISBN 978-3-642-12141-8.OCLC 639461749. ^abcdKnight,Chris(1998).JamesRHurford;MichaelStuddert-Kennedy;ChrisKnight(eds.).Ritual/speechcoevolution:asolutiontotheproblemofdeception(PDF).Approachestotheevolutionoflanguage :socialandcognitivebase.Cambridge,UK;NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.pp. 68–91.ISBN 978-0-521-63964-4.OCLC 37742390. ^abcKnight,Chris(2006).AngeloCangelosi;AndrewDMSmith;KennySmith(eds.).Languageco-evolvedwiththeruleoflaw(PDF).Theevolutionoflanguage :proceedingsofthe6thinternationalconference(EVOLANG6),Rome,Italy,12–15April200.NewJersey:WorldScientificPublishing.pp. 168–175.ISBN 978-981-256-656-0.OCLC 70797781. ^Savage-Rumbaugh,Sue;McDonald,Kelly(1988).RichardWByrne;AndrewWhiten(eds.).Deceptionandsocialmanipulationinsymbol-usingapes.Machiavellianintelligence :socialexpertiseandtheevolutionofintellectinmonkeys,apes,andhuman.Oxford:ClarendonPress.pp. 224–237.ISBN 978-0-19-852175-4.OCLC 17260831. ^Kegl,J.,A.SenghasandM.Coppola(1998).CreationthroughContact:SignlanguageemergenceandsignlanguagechangeinNicaragua.InM.DeGraff(ed.),LanguageCreationandChange:Creolization,DiachronyandDevelopment.Cambridge,Massachusetts:MITPress. ^Lieberman,P.;Crelin,E.S.(1971)."OnthespeechofNeandertalMan".LinguisticInquiry.2:203–22. ^abArensburg,B.;Tillier,A.M.;Vandermeersch,B.;Duday,H.;Schepartz,L.A.;Rak,Y.(1989)."AMiddlePalaeolithichumanhyoidbone".Nature.338(6218):758–760.Bibcode:1989Natur.338..758A.doi:10.1038/338758a0.PMID 2716823.S2CID 4309147. ^Diller,KarlC.;Cann,RebeccaL.(2009).RudolfPBotha;ChrisKnight(eds.).EvidenceAgainstaGenetic-BasedRevolutioninLanguage50,000YearsAgo.Thecradleoflanguage.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.pp. 135–149.ISBN 978-0-19-954586-5.OCLC 804498749. ^abHenshilwood,ChristopherStuart;Dubreuil,Benoît(2009).RudolfPBotha;ChrisKnight(eds.).ReadingtheArtefacts:GleaningLanguageSkillsFromtheMiddleStoneAgeinSouthernAfrica.Thecradleoflanguage.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.pp. 41–61.ISBN 978-0-19-954586-5.OCLC 804498749. ^Knight,Chris(2009).RudolfPBotha;ChrisKnight(eds.).Language,Ochre,andtheRuleofLaw.Thecradleoflanguage.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.pp. 281–303.ISBN 978-0-19-954586-5.OCLC 804498749. ^abWatts,Ian(2009).RudolfPBotha;ChrisKnight(eds.).RedOchre,BodyPainting,andLanguage:InterpretingtheBlombosOchre.Thecradleoflanguage.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.pp. 62–92.ISBN 978-0-19-954586-5.OCLC 804498749. ^abArcadi,AC.(August2000)."Vocalresponsivenessinmalewildchimpanzees:implicationsfortheevolutionoflanguage".JournalofHumanEvolution.39(2):205–23.doi:10.1006/jhev.2000.0415.PMID 10968929.S2CID 7403772. ^JohannaNichols,1998.Theoriginanddispersaloflanguages:Linguisticevidence.InNinaJablonskiandLeslieC.Aiello,eds.,TheOriginandDiversificationofLanguage,pp.127–70.(MemoirsoftheCaliforniaAcademyofSciences,24.)SanFrancisco:CaliforniaAcademyofSciences. ^abPerreault,C.;Mathew,S.(2012)."Datingtheoriginoflanguageusingphonemicdiversity".PLOSONE.7(4):e35289.Bibcode:2012PLoSO...735289P.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035289.PMC 3338724.PMID 22558135. ^ Botha,RudolfP.;Knight,Chris(2009).Thecradleoflanguage.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-19-954586-5.OCLC 804498749. ^Darwin,C.(1871)."TheDescentofMan,andSelectioninRelationtoSex,2vols.London:Murray,p.56. ^Müller,F.M.1996[1861].Thetheoreticalstage,andtheoriginoflanguage.Lecture9fromLecturesontheScienceofLanguage.ReprintedinR.Harris(ed.),TheOriginofLanguage.Bristol:ThoemmesPress,pp.7–41. ^Paget,R.1930.Humanspeech:someobservations,experiments,andconclusionsastothenature,origin,purposeandpossibleimprovementofhumanspeech.London:Routledge&KeganPaul. ^Firth,J.R.1964.TheTonguesofMenandSpeech.London:OxfordUniversityPress,pp.25–6. ^Stam,J.H.1976.Inquiriesintotheoriginsoflanguage.NewYork:HarperandRow,p.243-44. ^Shah,Mustafa(January2011)."ClassicalIslamicDiscourseontheOriginsofLanguage:CulturalMemoryandtheDefenseofOrthodoxy"(PDF).Numen.58(2–3):314–343.doi:10.1163/156852711X562335.S2CID 55165312–viaCORE. ^Weiss,B.(1987)."'Ilmal-wad':AnIntroductoryAccountofaLaterMuslimPhilologicalScience".Arabica.34(1):339–356.doi:10.1163/157005887X00054.S2CID 161187751. ^Weiss,B.(1974)."MedievalMuslimdiscussionsoftheoriginoflanguage"(PDF).ZeitschriftderDeutschenMorgenländischenGesellschaft.124(1):33–41.doi:10.1163/156852711X562335.JSTOR 43370636.S2CID 55165312–viaJSTOR. ^abZahavi,A.(May1993)."Thefallacyofconventionalsignalling".PhilosophicalTransactionsoftheRoyalSocietyB:BiologicalSciences.340(1292):227–230.Bibcode:1993RSPTB.340..227Z.doi:10.1098/rstb.1993.0061.PMID 8101657. ^Zahavi,A.andA.Zahavi1997.TheHandicapPrinciple:AMissingPieceinDarwin'sPuzzle.NewYorkandOxford:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 9780190284589 ^Smith,J.Maynard(1994)."Mustreliablesignalsalwaysbecostly?".AnimalBehaviour.47(5):1115–1120.doi:10.1006/anbe.1994.1149.ISSN 0003-3472.S2CID 54274718. ^abGoodall,Jane(1986).ThechimpanzeesofGombe :patternsofbehavior.Cambridge,Massachusetts:BelknapPressofHarvardUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-674-11649-8.OCLC 12550961. ^Byrne,RichardW.;Whiten,Andrew.(1988).Machiavellianintelligence :socialexpertiseandtheevolutionofintellectinmonkeys,apes,andhumans.Oxford:ClarendonPress.ISBN 978-0-19-852175-4.OCLC 17260831. ^deWaal,FransB.M.(2005)."IntentionalDeceptioninPrimates".EvolutionaryAnthropology.1(3):86–92.doi:10.1002/evan.1360010306.S2CID 221736130. ^abPower,Camilla(1998).JamesRHurford;MichaelStuddert-Kennedy;ChrisKnight(eds.).Oldwives'tales:thegossiphypothesisandthereliabilityofcheapsignals.Approachestotheevolutionoflanguage :socialandcognitivebase.Cambridge,UK;NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.pp. 111–129.ISBN 978-0-521-63964-4.OCLC 37742390. ^abFitch,W.T.(2004)."Kinselectionand'mothertongues':aneglectedcomponentinlanguageevolution"(PDF).InUlrikeGriebel;DKimbroughOller(eds.).Evolutionofcommunicationsystems :acomparativeapproach.Cambridge,Massachusetts:MITPress.pp. 275–296.ISBN 978-0-262-15111-5.OCLC 845673575. ^Hamilton,W.D.(1964)."Thegeneticalevolutionofsocialbehaviour.I,II".JournalofTheoreticalBiology.7(1):1–52.Bibcode:1964JThBi...7....1H.doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4.PMID 5875341. ^Knight,Chris(13November2000)."PlayasPrecursorofPhonologyandSyntax".TheEvolutionaryEmergenceofLanguage.CambridgeUniversityPress.pp. 99–120.doi:10.1017/cbo9780511606441.007.ISBN 978-0-521-78157-2.S2CID 56418139. ^abTallerman,Maggie(2013).RudolfPBotha;MartinEveraert(eds.).Kinselection,pedagogyandlinguisticcomplexity:whenceprotolanguage?.Theevolutionaryemergenceoflanguage :evidenceandinference.Oxford,UK:OxfordUniversityPress.pp. 77–96.ISBN 978-0-19-965485-7.OCLC 856795812. ^Trivers,R.L.(1971)."Theevolutionofreciprocalaltruism".QuarterlyReviewofBiology.46:35–57.doi:10.1086/406755.S2CID 19027999. ^Dessalles,JeanL.(1998).JamesR.Hurford;MichaelStuddert-Kennedy;ChrisKnight(eds.).Altruism,statusandtheoriginofrelevance.Approachestotheevolutionoflanguage :socialandcognitivebase.Cambridge,UK;NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.pp. 130–147.ISBN 978-0-521-63964-4.OCLC 37742390. ^abDunbar,R.I.M.(1996).Grooming,gossipandtheevolutionoflanguage.London:FaberandFaber.ISBN 9780571173969.OCLC 34546743. ^vonHeiseler;TillNikolaus(2014)."Languageevolvedforstorytellinginasuper-fastevolution".InR.L.C.Cartmill(ed.).EvolutionofLanguage.London:WorldScientific.pp. 114–121. ^Power,C.(1998)."Oldwives'tales:thegossiphypothesisandthereliabilityofcheapsignals".InJ.R.Hurford;M.StuddertKennedy;C.Knight(eds.).ApproachestotheEvolutionofLanguage:SocialandCognitiveBases.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.pp. 11129.[clarificationneeded] ^Lewis,Jerome(2009).RudolfPBotha;ChrisKnight(eds.).AsWellasWords:CongoPygmyHunting,Mimicry,andPlay.Thecradleoflanguage.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.pp. 236–256.ISBN 978-0-19-954586-5.OCLC 804498749. ^Enfield,N.J.(2010)."Withoutsocialcontext?"(PDF).Science.329(5999):1600–1601.Bibcode:2010Sci...329.1600E.doi:10.1126/science.1194229.hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0012-C777-5.S2CID 143530707. ^Steels,L.(2009).RudolfP.Botha;ChrisKnight(eds.).Issocialityacrucialprerequisitefortheemergenceoflanguage?.Theprehistoryoflanguage.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-19-954587-2.OCLC 819189595. ^Deacon,TerrenceWilliam(1997).Thesymbolicspecies :theco-evolutionoflanguageandthebrain.NewYork:W.W.Norton.ISBN 978-0-393-03838-5.OCLC 807018262. ^Rappaport,RoyA.(1979).Ecology,Meaning,andReligion.Richmond,Calif.:NorthAtlanticBooks.pp. 201–211.ISBN 978-0-913028-54-4.OCLC 397893672. ^Searle,J.R.1996.TheConstructionofSocialReality.London:Penguin. ^Durkheim,E.1947[1915]."Originsofthesebeliefs".ChapterVII.InÉ.Durkheim,TheElementaryFormsoftheReligiousLife:Astudyinreligioussociology.Trans.J.W.Swain.Glencoe,Illinois:TheFreePress,pp. 205–239. ^Chomsky,Noam(2011)."LanguageandOtherCognitiveSystems.WhatisSpecialAboutLanguage?".LanguageLearningandDevelopment.7(4):263–78.doi:10.1080/15475441.2011.584041.S2CID 122866773. ^abChomsky,N.(2005)."Threefactorsinlanguagedesign".LinguisticInquiry.36(1):1–22.doi:10.1162/0024389052993655.S2CID 14954986. ^Themultiplerolesofculturaltransmissionexperimentsinunderstandinghumanculturalevolution,AlexMesoudi,AndrewWhiten ^ChimpanzeeMaterialCulture:ImplicationsforHumanEvolution,WilliamClementMcGrew ^NewFrontiersinLanguageEvolutionandDevelopment:IntroductiontothetopicsVolume,D.KimbroughOller,RickDale,UlrikeGriebel ^Birdsong,speech,andlanguage:exploringtheevolutionofmindandbrain,JJBolhuis,MEveraert ^abUomini,NatalieThaïs;Meyer,GeorgFriedrich(30August2013).Petraglia,MichaelD.(ed.)."SharedBrainLateralizationPatternsinLanguageandAcheuleanStoneToolProduction:AFunctionalTranscranialDopplerUltrasoundStudy".PLOSONE.8(8):e72693.Bibcode:2013PLoSO...872693U.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072693.ISSN 1932-6203.PMC 3758346.PMID 24023634. ^Stout,Dietrich;Chaminade,Thierry(12January2012)."Stonetools,languageandthebraininhumanevolution".PhilosophicalTransactionsoftheRoyalSocietyB:BiologicalSciences.367(1585):75–87.doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0099.PMC 3223784.PMID 22106428. ^Putt,ShelbyS.J.;Anwarzai,Zara;Holden,Chloe;Ruck,Lana;Schoenemann,P.Thomas(4January2022)."Theevolutionofcombinatorialityandcompositionalityinhominidtooluse:acomparativeperspective".InternationalJournalofPrimatology.doi:10.1007/s10764-021-00267-7.ISSN 1573-8604.S2CID 245654206. ^Barham,Lawrence;Everett,Daniel(June2021)."SemioticsandtheOriginofLanguageintheLowerPalaeolithic".JournalofArchaeologicalMethodandTheory.28(2):535–579.doi:10.1007/s10816-020-09480-9.ISSN 1072-5369.S2CID 225509049. ^Arnauld,Antoine;Lancelot,Claude(1975)[Firstpublished1660].GeneralandRationalGrammar :ThePort-RoyalGrammar.TheHague:Mouton.ISBN 902793004X. ^abDaneš,František(1987)."OnPragueschoolfunctionalisminlinguistics".InDirven,R.;Fried,V.(eds.).FunctionalisminLinguistics.JohnBenjamins.pp. 3–38.ISBN 9789027215246. ^Aronoff,Mark(2017)."Darwinismtestedbythescienceoflanguage".InBowern;Horn;Zanuttini(eds.).OnLookingintoWords(andBeyond):Structures,Relations,Analyses.SUNYPress.pp. 443–456.ISBN 978-3-946234-92-0.Retrieved3March2020. ^Hauser,MarkD.;Yang,Charles;Berwick,RobertC.;Tattersall,Ian;Ryan,MichaelJ.;Watumull,Jeffrey;Chomsky,Noam;Lewontin,RichardC.(2014)."Themysteryoflanguageevolution".FrontiersinPsychology.5:401.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00401.PMC 4019876.PMID 24847300. ^Anderson,EarlR.(1998).AGrammarofIconism.FairleighDickinsonUniversityPress.ISBN 9780838637647. ^deSaussure,Ferdinand(1959)[Firstpublished1916].Courseingenerallinguistics(PDF).NewYork:PhilosophyLibrary.ISBN 9780231157278. ^Lévi-Strauss,Claude(1987).IntroductiontotheworkofMarcelMauss.Routledge&KeganPaulLtd.pp. 59–60.ISBN 0-7100-9066-8. ^Hejl,P.M.(2013)."Theimportanceoftheconceptsof'organism'and'evolution'inEmileDurkheim'sdivisionofsociallaborandtheinfluenceofHerbertSpencer".InMaasen,Sabine;Mendelsohn,E.;Weingart,P.(eds.).BiologyasSociety,SocietyasBiology:Metaphors.Springer.pp. 155–191.ISBN 9789401106733. ^Chomsky,N.(2004).LanguageandMind:Currentthoughtsonancientproblems.Part I&Part II.InLyleJenkins(ed.),VariationandUniversalsinBiolinguistics.Amsterdam:Elsevier,pp. 379–405. ^Berwick,Robert;Chomsky,Noam(2016).WhyOnlyUs:LanguageandEvolution.Cambridge,Massachusetts:MITPress.ISBN 9780262034241.OCLC 934433881. ^deBoer,Bart;Thompson,Bill;Ravignani,Andrea;Boeckx,Cedric(16January2020)."EvolutionaryDynamicsDoNotMotivateaSingle-MutantTheoryofHumanLanguage".ScientificReports.10(1):451.Bibcode:2020NatSR..10..451D.doi:10.1038/s41598-019-57235-8.ISSN 2045-2322.PMC 6965110.PMID 31949223. ^Martins,PedroTiago;Boeckx,Cedric(27November2019)."Languageevolutionandcomplexityconsiderations:Thenohalf-Mergefallacy".PLOSBiology.17(11):e3000389.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000389.ISSN 1545-7885.PMC 6880980.PMID 31774810. ^ Carnie,Andrew(2012).Syntax:AGenerativeIntroduction(3rd ed.).WestSussex,UK:Wiley-Blackwell.pp. 20–21.ISBN 978-0-470-65531-3. ^Dediu,Dan;Levinson,StephenC.(2013)."Ontheantiquityoflanguage:thereinterpretationofNeandertallinguisticcapacitiesanditsconsequences".FrontiersinPsychology.4:397.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00397.ISSN 1664-1078.PMC 3701805.PMID 23847571. ^abVyshedskiy,Andrey(29July2019)."Languageevolutiontorevolution:theleapfromrich-vocabularynon-recursivecommunicationsystemtorecursivelanguage70,000yearsagowasassociatedwithacquisitionofanovelcomponentofimagination,calledPrefrontalSynthesis,enabledbyamutationthatsloweddowntheprefrontalcortexmaturationsimultaneouslyintwoormorechildren –theRomulusandRemushypothesis".ResearchIdeasandOutcomes.5.doi:10.3897/rio.5.e38546.ISSN 2367-7163. ^Bakker,Peter(July1987)."AutonomousLanguagesofTwins".ActaGeneticaeMedicaeetGemellologiae:TwinResearch.36(2):233–238.doi:10.1017/S0001566000004463.ISSN 0001-5660.PMID 3434134. ^AmosW.;HoffmanJ.I.(7January2010)."Evidencethattwomainbottleneckeventsshapedmodernhumangeneticdiversity".ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyB:BiologicalSciences.277(1678):131–137.doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1473.PMC 2842629.PMID 19812086. ^Premack,David&Premack,AnnJames.TheMindofanApe,ISBN 0-393-01581-5. ^Pollick,AS.;deWaal,FB.(May2007)."ApeGesturesandLanguageEvolution".ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciencesoftheUnitedStatesofAmerica.104(19):8184–9.Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.8184P.doi:10.1073/pnas.0702624104.PMC 1876592.PMID 17470779. ^Kimura,Doreen(1993).Neuromotormechanismsinhumancommunication.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-19-505492-7.OCLC 26396505. ^Newman,A.J.;et al.(2002)."ACriticalPeriodforRightHemisphereRecruitmentinAmericanSignLanguageProcessing".NatureNeuroscience.5(1):76–80.doi:10.1038/nn775.PMID 11753419.S2CID 2745545. ^abArbibMA;Liebal,K;Pika,S(December2008)."Primatevocalization,gesture,andtheevolutionofhumanlanguage".CurrentAnthropology.49(6):1053–63,discussion1063–76.doi:10.1086/593015.PMID 19391445.S2CID 18832100. ^Capone,NinaC.;McGregor,KarlaK.(2004)."GestureDevelopment".JournalofSpeech,Language,andHearingResearch.47(1):173–86.doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/015).PMID 15072537.S2CID 7244799. ^OzçalişkanS;Goldin-MeadowS(July2005)."Gestureisatthecuttingedgeofearlylanguagedevelopment".Cognition.96(3):B101–13.doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.001.PMID 15996556.S2CID 206863317. ^abRizzolatti,G.(2008).GiacomoRizzolattiontheEvolutionofLanguage.Retrievedfromhttp://gocognitive.net/interviews/evolution-language-gestures[fullcitationneeded] ^abKendon,Adam(February2017)."Reflectionsonthe"gesture-first"hypothesisoflanguageorigins".PsychonomicBulletin&Review.24(1):163–170.doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1117-3.PMC 5325861.PMID 27439503. ^Corballis,MichaelC.(2002).AlisonWray(ed.).Thetransitiontolanguage.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.pp. 161–179.ISBN 978-0-19-925066-0.OCLC 48532303. ^Knight,Chris(2006).AngeloCangelosi;AndrewDMSmith;KennySmith(eds.).Languageco-evolvedwiththeruleoflaw(PDF).Theevolutionoflanguage :proceedingsofthe6thinternationalconference(EVOLANG6),Rome,Italy,12–15April200.Vol. 7.NewJersey:WorldScientific.pp. 109–128.doi:10.1007/s11299-007-0039-1.ISBN 9789812566560.OCLC 70797781.S2CID 143877486. ^Knight,Chris(2000).ChrisKnight;MichaelStuddert-Kennedy;JamesRHurford(eds.).Playasprecursorofphonologyandsyntax.TheEvolutionaryemergenceoflanguage :socialfunctionandtheoriginsoflinguisticfor.Cambridge;NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.pp. 99–1119.ISBN 978-0-521-78157-2.OCLC 807262339. ^Kolb,Bryan&IanQ.Whishaw(2003).FundamentalsofHumanNeuropsychology(5th ed.).WorthPublishers.ISBN 978-0-7167-5300-1. ^Sandler,Wendy;&Lillo-Martin,Diane.(2006).SignLanguageandLinguisticUniversals.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress. ^Meena,Dr.RamLakhan(2021).CurrentTrendsofAppliedLinguistics.K.K.Publications.p. 48. ^Hewes,GordonW.;Andrew,R.J.;Carini,Louis;Choe,Hackeny;Gardner,R.Allen;Kortlandt,A.;Krantz,GroverS.;McBride,Glen;Nottebohm,Fernando;Pfeiffer,John;Rumbaugh,DuaneG.;Steklis,HorstD.;Raliegh,MichaelJ.;Stopa,Roman;Suzuki,Akira;Washburn,S.L.;Wescott,RogerW.(1973)."PrimateCommunicationandtheGesturalOriginofLanguage[andCommentsandReply]".CurrentAnthropology.14(1/2):5–24.doi:10.1086/201401.JSTOR 2741093.S2CID 146288708. ^McNeill,David;Bertenthal,Bennett;Cole,Jonathan;Gallagher,Shaun(April2005)."Gesture-first,butnogestures?".BehavioralandBrainSciences.28(2):138–139.doi:10.1017/S0140525X05360031.S2CID 51753637. ^abLarsson,M(2015)."Tool-use-associatedsoundintheevolutionoflanguage".AnimalCognition.18(5):993–1005.doi:10.1007/s10071-015-0885-x.PMID 26118672.S2CID 18714154. ^Larsson,M(2014)."Self-generatedsoundsoflocomotionandventilationandtheevolutionofhumanrhythmicabilities".AnimalCognition.17(1):1–14.doi:10.1007/s10071-013-0678-z.PMC 3889703.PMID 23990063. ^Skoyles,JohnR.,Gesture,LanguageOrigins,andRightHandedness,Psycholoqy:11,#24,2000 ^abPetrides,M.;Cadoret,G.;Mackey,S.(June2005)."OrofacialsomatomotorresponsesinthemacaquemonkeyhomologueofBroca'sarea".Nature.435(7046):1235–8.Bibcode:2005Natur.435.1235P.doi:10.1038/nature03628.PMID 15988526.S2CID 4397762. ^Porter,RJ.;Lubker,JF.(September1980)."Rapidreproductionofvowel-vowelsequences:evidenceforafastanddirectacoustic-motoriclinkageinspeech".JournalofSpeechandHearingResearch.23(3):593–602.doi:10.1044/jshr.2303.593.PMID 7421161. ^McCarthy,R.;Warrington,EK.(June1984)."Atwo-routemodelofspeechproduction.Evidencefromaphasia".Brain.107(2):463–85.doi:10.1093/brain/107.2.463.PMID 6722512. ^McCarthy,RA.;Warrington,EK.(2001)."Repeatingwithoutsemantics:surfacedysphasia?".Neurocase.7(1):77–87.doi:10.1093/neucas/7.1.77.PMID 11239078.S2CID 12988855. ^Marslen-Wilson,W.(1973)."Linguisticstructureandspeechshadowingatveryshortlatencies".Nature.244(5417):522–523.Bibcode:1973Natur.244..522M.doi:10.1038/244522a0.PMID 4621131.S2CID 4220775. ^Fay,WH.;Coleman,RO.(July1977)."Ahumansoundtransducer/reproducer:temporalcapabilitiesofaprofoundlyecholalicchild".BrainandLanguage.4(3):396–402.doi:10.1016/0093-934x(77)90034-7.PMID 907878.S2CID 29492873. ^Schippers,MB;Roebroeck,A;Renken,R;Nanetti,L;Keysers,C(2010)."MappingtheInformationflowfromonebraintoanotherduringgesturalcommunication".ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciencesoftheUnitedStatesofAmerica.107(20):9388–93.Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.9388S.doi:10.1073/pnas.1001791107.PMC 2889063.PMID 20439736. ^Moro,Andrea(2008).TheboundariesofBabel :thebrainandtheenigmaofimpossiblelanguage.Cambridge,Massachusetts:MITPress.ISBN 978-0-262-13498-9.OCLC 804408004.[page needed] ^abFalk,D.(August2004)."Prelinguisticevolutioninearlyhominins:whencemotherese?"(PDF).BehavioralandBrainSciences.27(4):491–503,discussion503–83.doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000111.PMID 15773427.S2CID 39547572.Archivedfromtheoriginal(PDF)on4January2014.Retrieved4January2014. ^Kaye,K.(1982).TheMentalandSocialLifeofBabies.Univ.ChicagoPress.pp. 186.ISBN 0226428486. ^Poliva,Oren(20September2017)."Fromwheretowhat:aneuroanatomicallybasedevolutionarymodeloftheemergenceofspeechinhumans".F1000Research.4:67.doi:10.12688/f1000research.6175.3.ISSN 2046-1402.PMC 5600004.PMID 28928931. ^Poliva,Oren(30June2016)."FromMimicrytoLanguage:ANeuroanatomicallyBasedEvolutionaryModeloftheEmergenceofVocalLanguage".FrontiersinNeuroscience.10:307.doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00307.ISSN 1662-453X.PMC 4928493.PMID 27445676. ^Scott,S.K.(1December2000)."Identificationofapathwayforintelligiblespeechinthelefttemporallobe".Brain.123(12):2400–2406.doi:10.1093/brain/123.12.2400.ISSN 1460-2156.PMC 5630088.PMID 11099443. ^Davis,MatthewH.;Johnsrude,IngridS.(15April2003)."HierarchicalProcessinginSpokenLanguageComprehension".TheJournalofNeuroscience.23(8):3423–3431.doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-08-03423.2003.ISSN 0270-6474.PMC 6742313.PMID 12716950. ^Petkov,ChristopherI;Kayser,Christoph;Steudel,Thomas;Whittingstall,Kevin;Augath,Mark;Logothetis,NikosK(10February2008)."Avoiceregioninthemonkeybrain".NatureNeuroscience.11(3):367–374.doi:10.1038/nn2043.ISSN 1097-6256.PMID 18264095.S2CID 5505773. ^Buchsbaum,BradleyR.;Baldo,Juliana;Okada,Kayoko;Berman,KarenF.;Dronkers,Nina;D'Esposito,Mark;Hickok,Gregory(December2011)."Conductionaphasia,sensory-motorintegration,andphonologicalshort-termmemory–AnaggregateanalysisoflesionandfMRIdata".BrainandLanguage.119(3):119–128.doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2010.12.001.ISSN 0093-934X.PMC 3090694.PMID 21256582. ^Warren,JaneE.;Wise,RichardJ.S.;Warren,JasonD.(December2005)."Soundsdo-able:auditory–motortransformationsandtheposteriortemporalplane".TrendsinNeurosciences.28(12):636–643.doi:10.1016/j.tins.2005.09.010.ISSN 0166-2236.PMID 16216346.S2CID 36678139. ^Campbell,Ruth(12March2008)."Theprocessingofaudio-visualspeech:empiricalandneuralbases".PhilosophicalTransactionsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondonB:BiologicalSciences.363(1493):1001–1010.doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2155.ISSN 0962-8436.PMC 2606792.PMID 17827105. ^Kayser,Christoph;Petkov,ChristopherI.;Logothetis,NikosK.(December2009)."Multisensoryinteractionsinprimateauditorycortex:fMRIandelectrophysiology".HearingResearch.258(1–2):80–88.doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.02.011.ISSN 0378-5955.PMID 19269312.S2CID 31412246. ^Hickok,Gregory;Buchsbaum,Bradley;Humphries,Colin;Muftuler,Tugan(1July2003)."Auditory–MotorInteractionRevealedbyfMRI:Speech,Music,andWorkingMemoryinAreaSpt".JournalofCognitiveNeuroscience.15(5):673–682.doi:10.1162/089892903322307393.ISSN 1530-8898.PMID 12965041. ^Schwartz,M.F.;Faseyitan,O.;Kim,J.;Coslett,H.B.(20November2012)."Thedorsalstreamcontributiontophonologicalretrievalinobjectnaming".Brain.135(12):3799–3814.doi:10.1093/brain/aws300.ISSN 0006-8950.PMC 3525060.PMID 23171662. ^Gow,DavidW.(June2012)."Thecorticalorganizationoflexicalknowledge:Aduallexiconmodelofspokenlanguageprocessing".BrainandLanguage.121(3):273–288.doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.03.005.ISSN 0093-934X.PMC 3348354.PMID 22498237. ^Buchsbaum,BradleyR.;D'Esposito,Mark(May2008)."TheSearchforthePhonologicalStore:FromLooptoConvolution".JournalofCognitiveNeuroscience.20(5):762–778.doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20501.ISSN 0898-929X.PMID 18201133.S2CID 17878480. ^Lachaux,Jean-Philippe;Jerbi,Karim;Bertrand,Olivier;Minotti,Lorella;Hoffmann,Dominique;Schoendorff,Benjamin;Kahane,Philippe(31October2007)."ABlueprintforReal-TimeFunctionalMappingviaHumanIntracranialRecordings".PLOSONE.2(10):e1094.Bibcode:2007PLoSO...2.1094L.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001094.ISSN 1932-6203.PMC 2040217.PMID 17971857. ^Jardri,Renaud;Houfflin-Debarge,Véronique;Delion,Pierre;Pruvo,Jean-Pierre;Thomas,Pierre;Pins,Delphine(April2012)."Assessingfetalresponsetomaternalspeechusinganoninvasivefunctionalbrainimagingtechnique".InternationalJournalofDevelopmentalNeuroscience.30(2):159–161.doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.11.002.ISSN 0736-5748.PMID 22123457.S2CID 2603226. ^Petersen,M.;Beecher,M.;Zoloth;Moody,D.;Stebbins,W.(20October1978)."Neurallateralizationofspecies-specificvocalizationsbyJapanesemacaques(Macacafuscata)".Science.202(4365):324–327.Bibcode:1978Sci...202..324P.doi:10.1126/science.99817.ISSN 0036-8075.PMID 99817. ^Heffner,H.;Heffner,R.(5October1984)."Temporallobelesionsandperceptionofspecies-specificvocalizationsbymacaques".Science.226(4670):75–76.Bibcode:1984Sci...226...75H.doi:10.1126/science.6474192.ISSN 0036-8075.PMID 6474192. ^Shu,W.;Cho,J.Y.;Jiang,Y.;Zhang,M.;Weisz,D.;Elder,G.A.;Schmeidler,J.;DeGasperi,R.;Sosa,M.A.G.(27June2005)."AlteredultrasonicvocalizationinmicewithadisruptionintheFoxp2gene".ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences.102(27):9643–9648.Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.9643S.doi:10.1073/pnas.0503739102.ISSN 0027-8424.PMC 1160518.PMID 15983371. ^Sia,G.M.;Clem,R.L.;Huganir,R.L.(31October2013)."TheHumanLanguage-AssociatedGeneSRPX2RegulatesSynapseFormationandVocalizationinMice".Science.342(6161):987–991.Bibcode:2013Sci...342..987S.doi:10.1126/science.1245079.ISSN 0036-8075.PMC 3903157.PMID 24179158. ^Sperber,D.andD.Wilson1986.Relevance.Communicationandcognition.Oxford:Blackwell. ^abcDeutscher,Guy(2005).Theunfoldingoflanguage :anevolutionarytourofmankind'sgreatestinvention.NewYork:MetropolitanBooks.ISBN 978-0-8050-7907-4.OCLC 57311730. ^Hopper,P.J.1998.Emergentgrammar.InM.Tomasello(ed.),TheNewPsychologyofLanguage.Mahwah,NJ:LawrenceErlbaum,155–175. ^abcHeine,Bernd;Kuteva,Tania(2007).Thegenesisofgrammar :areconstructio.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-19-922777-8.OCLC 849464326. ^abLakoff,G.andM.Johnson1980.MetaphorsWeLiveBy.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress. ^abHeine,Bernd;Kuteva,Tania(2012).MaggieTallerman;KathleenR.Gibson(eds.).Grammaticalizationtheoryasatoolforreconstructinglanguageevolution.TheOxfordhandbookoflanguageevolution.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.pp. 512–527.ISBN 978-0-19-954111-9.OCLC 724665645. ^Cheney,DorothyL.;Seyfarth,RobertM.(2005)."Constraintsandpreadaptationsintheearlieststagesoflanguageevolution"(PDF).TheLinguisticReview.22(2–4):135–59.doi:10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.135.S2CID 18939193. ^MaynardSmith,John;Harper,David(2003).Animalsignals.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-19-852684-1.OCLC 54460090. ^Davidson,R.D.1979.Whatmetaphorsmean.InS.Sacks(ed.),OnMetaphor.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress,pp. 29–45. ^Lakoff,G.andR.Núñez2000.Wheremathematicscomesfrom.NewYork:BasicBooks. ^Gallup,GGJr.(1970)."Chimpanzees:Selfrecognition".Science.167(3914):86–87.Bibcode:1970Sci...167...86G.doi:10.1126/science.167.3914.86.PMID 4982211.S2CID 145295899. ^Mitchell,R.W.(1995)."Evidenceofdolphinself-recognitionandthedifficultiesofinterpretation".ConsciousnessandCognition.4(2):229–234.doi:10.1006/ccog.1995.1029.PMID 8521261.S2CID 45507064. ^Ko,KwangHyun(2016)."Originsofhumanintelligence:Thechainoftool-makingandbrainevolution"(PDF).AnthropologicalNotebooks.22(1):5–22. ^abSoma,M.;Hiraiwa-Hasegawa,M.;Okanoya,K.(2009)."EarlyontogeneticeffectsonsongqualityintheBengalesefinch(Lonchurastriatavar.domestica):layingorder,siblingcompetitionandsongsyntax".BehavioralEcologyandSociobiology.63(3):363–370.doi:10.1007/s00265-008-0670-9.S2CID 23137306. ^GrahamRitchie;SimonKirby(2005)."Selection,domestication,andtheemergenceoflearnedcommunicationsystems"(PDF).SecondInternationalSymposiumontheEmergenceandEvolutionofLinguisticCommunication.Archivedfromtheoriginal(PDF)on21January2012. ^MacNeilage,P.1998.Evolutionofthemechanismoflanguageoutput:comparativeneurobiologyofvocalandmanualcommunication.InJ. R.Hurford,M.StuddertKennedyandC.Knight(eds),ApproachestotheEvolutionofLanguage.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,pp. 22241[clarify]. ^abcdHauser,M.D.;Chomsky,N.;Fitch,W.T.(November2002)."Thefacultyoflanguage:whatisit,whohasit,andhowdiditevolve?"(PDF).Science.298(5598):1569–1579.doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569.PMID 12446899.Archivedfromtheoriginal(PDF)on28December2013. ^Everett,DanielL.(2005)."CulturalConstraintsonGrammarandCognitioninPirahaAnotherLookattheDesignFeaturesofHumanLanguage"(PDF).CurrentAnthropology.46(4):621–646.doi:10.1086/431525.hdl:2066/41103.S2CID 2223235. ^Zhordania,I.M.(2006).Whoaskedthefirstquestion :theoriginsofhumanchoralsinging,intelligence,languageandspeech.Tbilisi,Georgia:LogosTbilisiIvaneJavakhishviliStateUniversity.ISBN 9789994031818.OCLC 224993377. ^Savage-Rumbaugh,E.Sue;Murphy,Jeannine;Sevcik,RoseA.;Brakke,KarenE.;Williams,ShellyL.;Rumbaugh,DuaneM.;Bates,Elizabeth(1993)."LanguageComprehensioninApeandChild".MonographsoftheSocietyforResearchinChildDevelopment.58(3/4):i–252.doi:10.2307/1166068.JSTOR 1166068.PMID 8366872. ^Bolinger,DwightL.(Editor)1972.Intonation.SelectedReadings.Harmondsworth:Penguin,p. 314. ^Cruttenden,Alan(1986).Intonation.Cambridge[Cambridgeshire];NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.pp. 169–174.ISBN 978-0-521-26028-2.OCLC 12103838. ^Tomasello,Michael;Call,Josep;Hare,Brian(April2003)."Chimpanzeesunderstandpsychologicalstates–thequestioniswhichonesandtowhatextent".TrendsinCognitiveSciences.7(4):153–156.doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00035-4.PMID 12691762.S2CID 3390980. ^Hale,CourtneyMelinda;Tager-Flusberg,Helen(June2003)."Theinfluenceoflanguageontheoryofmind:atrainingstudy".DevelopmentalScience.6(3):346–359.doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00289.PMC 1350918.PMID 16467908. ^Matsuzawa,Tetsuro(1985)."Useofnumbersbyachimpanzee".Nature.315(6014):57–59.Bibcode:1985Natur.315...57M.doi:10.1038/315057a0.PMID 3990808.S2CID 4361089. ^Cheung,Pierina;Rubenson,Miriam;Barner,David(February2017)."Toinfinityandbeyond:Childrengeneralizethesuccessorfunctiontoallpossiblenumbersyearsafterlearningtocount".CognitivePsychology.92:22–36.doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.11.002.PMID 27889550.S2CID 206867905–viaScienceDirect. ^Carey,Susan(2001)."CognitiveFoundationsofArithmetic:EvolutionandOntogenisis"(PDF).MindandLanguage.16(1):37–55.doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00155.Archivedfromtheoriginal(PDF)on25July2013.Retrieved13January2014. ^Hockett,CharlesF.(1960)."TheOriginofSpeech"(PDF).ScientificAmerican.203(3):88–96.Bibcode:1960SciAm.203c..88H.doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88.PMID 14402211.Archivedfromtheoriginal(PDF)on6January2014.Retrieved6January2014. ^Schlenker,Philippe;Chemla,Emmanuel;Arnold,Kate;Lemasson,Alban;Ouattara,Karim;Keenan,Sumir;Stephan,Claudia;Ryder,Robin;Zuberbühler,Klaus(December2014)."Monkeysemantics:two'dialects'ofCampbell'smonkeyalarmcalls".LinguisticsandPhilosophy.37(6):439–501.doi:10.1007/s10988-014-9155-7.S2CID 3428900. ^abcDiamond,JaredM.(1992)."Bridgestohumanlanguage".Thethirdchimpanzee :theevolutionandfutureofthehumananimal.NewYork:HarperCollins.pp. 141–167.ISBN 978-0-06-018307-3.OCLC 24246928. ^Savage-Rumbaugh,E.Sue;Lewin,Roger.(1994).Kanzi :theapeatthebrinkofthehumanmind.NewYork:Wiley.ISBN 978-0-471-58591-6.OCLC 30112573. ^Savage-Rumbaugh,E.Sue;Shanker,Stuart.;Taylor,TalbotJ.(1998).Apes,language,andthehumanmind.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-19-510986-3.OCLC 38566026. ^Freeman,Scott;JonC.Herron.,EvolutionaryAnalysis(4thed.),PearsonEducation,Inc.(2007),ISBN 0-13-227584-8pages789–90 ^Seyfarth,RobertM.;Cheney,DorothyL.;Marler,Peter(1980)."Vervetmonkeyalarmcalls:Semanticcommunicationinafree-rangingprimate".AnimalBehaviour.28(4):1070–1094.doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80097-2.S2CID 53165940. ^Arnold,Kate;Zuberbühler,Klaus(2006)."Languageevolution:Semanticcombinationsinprimatecalls".Nature.441(7091):303.Bibcode:2006Natur.441..303A.doi:10.1038/441303a.PMID 16710411.S2CID 4413635. ^Wade,Nicholas(23May2006)."NigerianMonkeysDropHintsonLanguageOrigin".TheNewYorkTimes.Retrieved9September2007. ^Gibbons,ChristopherM.(2007).Thereferentialityofchimpanzeevocalsignaling:behavioralandacousticanalysisoffoodbarks(Thesis).OhioStateUniversity. ^Slocombe,KatieE.;Zuberbühler,Klaus(2005)."FunctionallyReferentialCommunicationinaChimpanzee"(PDF).CurrentBiology.15(19):1779–1784.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.068.PMID 16213827.S2CID 6774592. ^abClark,Gary;Henneberg,Maciej(2017)."Ardipithecusramidusandtheevolutionoflanguageandsinging:Anearlyoriginforhomininvocalcapability".HOMO.68(2):101–121.doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2017.03.001.PMID 28363458. ^Aronoff,Mark;Rees-Miller,Janie.(2001).Thehandbookoflinguistics.Malden,Mass.:BlackwellPublishers.ISBN 0631204970.OCLC 43115110. ^Fitch,W.Tecumseh(2000)."Theevolutionofspeech:acomparativereview".TrendsinCognitiveSciences.4(7):258–267.doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01494-7.PMID 10859570.S2CID 14706592. ^Ohala,JohnJ.(10September1987)."ExperimentalPhonology".AnnualMeetingoftheBerkeleyLinguisticsSociety.13:207.doi:10.3765/bls.v13i0.1803.ISSN 2377-1666. ^"APAUpgradesAPAPsycNETContentDeliveryPlatform".AmericanPsychologicalAssociation.2017.doi:10.1037/e500792018-001.{{citejournal}}:Citejournalrequires|journal=(help)[fullcitationneeded] ^abMithen,StevenJ.(2006).Thesingingneanderthals :theoriginsofmusic,language,mind,andbody.Cambridge,Massachusetts:HarvardUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-674-02192-1.OCLC 62090869. ^Barham,Lawrence;Everett,Daniel(1June2021)."SemioticsandtheOriginofLanguageintheLowerPalaeolithic".JournalofArchaeologicalMethodandTheory.28(2):535–579.doi:10.1007/s10816-020-09480-9.ISSN 1573-7764.S2CID 225509049. ^Vicari,Giuseppe;Adenzato,Mauro(May2014)."Isrecursionlanguage-specific?Evidenceofrecursivemechanismsinthestructureofintentionalaction".ConsciousnessandCognition.26:169–188.doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.03.010.PMID 24762973.S2CID 206955548. ^Corballis,Michael(2007)."TheUniquenessofHumanRecursiveThinking".AmericanScientist.95(3):240.doi:10.1511/2007.65.240.ISSN 0003-0996. ^Everett,DanielL.(August2005)."CulturalConstraintsonGrammarandCognitioninPirahã:AnotherLookattheDesignFeaturesofHumanLanguage".CurrentAnthropology.46(4):621–646.doi:10.1086/431525.hdl:2066/41103.ISSN 0011-3204.S2CID 2223235. ^Arensburg,B.;Schepartz,L.A.;Tillier,A.M.;Vandermeersch,B.;Rak,Y.(October1990)."AreappraisaloftheanatomicalbasisforspeechinMiddlePalaeolithichominids".AmericanJournalofPhysicalAnthropology.83(2):137–46.doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330830202.PMID 2248373. ^D'Anastasio,R.;Wroe,S.;Tuniz,C.;Mancini,L.;Cesana,D.T.;Dreossi,D.;Ravichandiran,M.;Attard,M.;et al.(2013)."Micro-biomechanicsofthekebara2hyoidanditsimplicationsforspeechinneanderthals".PLOSONE.8(12):e82261.Bibcode:2013PLoSO...882261D.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082261.PMC 3867335.PMID 24367509. ^Jungers,W.L.;Pokempner,A.A.;Kay,R.F.;Cartmill,M.(August2003)."Hypoglossalcanalsizeinlivinghominoidsandtheevolutionofhumanspeech"(PDF).HumanBiology.75(4):473–84.doi:10.1353/hub.2003.0057.PMID 14655872.S2CID 30777048.Archivedfromtheoriginal(PDF)on12June2007. ^DeGusta,D.;Gilbert,W.H.;Turner,S.P.(February1999)."Hypoglossalcanalsizeandhominidspeech".ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciencesoftheUnitedStatesofAmerica.96(4):1800–4.Bibcode:1999PNAS...96.1800D.doi:10.1073/pnas.96.4.1800.PMC 15600.PMID 9990105. ^Johansson,Sverker(April2006)."ConstrainingtheTimeWhenLanguageEvolved"(PDF).EvolutionofLanguage:SixthInternationalConference,Rome:152–159.doi:10.1142/9789812774262_0020.ISBN 9789812566560.Archivedfromtheoriginal(PDF)on15October2006.Retrieved10September2007. ^Houghton,P.(February1993)."Neandertalsupralaryngealvocaltract".AmericanJournalofPhysicalAnthropology.90(2):139–46.doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330900202.PMID 8430750. ^Boë,Louis-Jean;Maeda,Shinji;Heim,Jean-Louis(1999)."Neandertalmanwasnotmorphologicallyhandicappedforspeech".EvolutionofCommunication.3(1):49–77.doi:10.1075/eoc.3.1.05boe. ^deBoer,Bart(2017)."Evolutionofspeechandevolutionoflanguage".PsychonomicBulletin&Review.24(1):158–162.doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1130-6.ISSN 1069-9384. ^Klarreich,E.(2004)."BiographyofRichardG.Klein".ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences.101(16):5705–7.Bibcode:2004PNAS..101.5705K.doi:10.1073/pnas.0402190101.PMC 395972.PMID 15079069. ^Klein,RichardG."ThreeDistinctHumanPopulations".BiologicalandBehavioralOriginsofModernHumans.AccessExcellence@TheNationalHealthMuseum.Retrieved10September2007. ^Marwick,Ben(2003)."PleistoceneExchangeNetworksasEvidencefortheEvolutionofLanguage".CambridgeArchaeologicalJournal.13:67–81.doi:10.1017/S0959774303000040.hdl:1885/42089.S2CID 15514627. ^abConde-Valverde,Mercedes;Martínez,Ignacio;Quam,RolfM.;Rosa,Manuel;Velez,AlexD.;Lorenzo,Carlos;Jarabo,Pilar;BermúdezdeCastro,JoséMaría;Carbonell,Eudald;Arsuaga,JuanLuis(1March2021)."NeanderthalsandHomosapienshadsimilarauditoryandspeechcapacities".NatureEcology&Evolution.5(5):609–615.doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01391-6.ISSN 2397-334X.PMID 33649543.S2CID 232090739. ^Fleagle,JohnG.;Assefa,Zelalem;Brown,FrancisH.;Shea,JohnJ.(2008)."PaleoanthropologyoftheKibishFormation,southernEthiopia:Introduction".JournalofHumanEvolution.55(3):360–5.doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.05.007.PMID 18617219. ^Henshilwood,C.S.;d'Errico,F.;Yates,R.;Jacobs,Z.;Tribolo,C.;Duller,G.A.T.;Mercier,N.;Sealy,J.C.;Valladas,H.;Watts,I.;Wintle,A.G.(2002)."Emergenceofmodernhumanbehavior:MiddleStoneAgeengravingsfromSouthAfrica".Science.295(5558):1278–1280.Bibcode:2002Sci...295.1278H.doi:10.1126/science.1067575.PMID 11786608.S2CID 31169551. ^Minkel,J.R.(18July2007)."SkullsAddto"OutofAfrica"TheoryofHumanOrigins:Patternofskullvariationbolstersthecasethathumanstookoverfromearlierspecies".ScientificAmerican.com.Retrieved9September2007. ^ChrisStringer,2011.TheOriginofOurSpecies.London:Penguin. ^Fitch,WT.(2000)."Thephoneticpotentialofnonhumanvocaltracts:comparativecineradiographicobservationsofvocalizinganimals".Phonetica.57(2–4):205–18.doi:10.1159/000028474.PMID 10992141.S2CID 202652500. ^Fitch,WT.;Reby,D.(August2001)."Thedescendedlarynxisnotuniquelyhuman".ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyB.268(1477):1669–75.doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1704.PMC 1088793.PMID 11506679. ^Weissengruber,GE.;Forstenpointner,G.;Peters,G.;Kübber-Heiss,A.;Fitch,WT.(September2002)."Hyoidapparatusandpharynxinthelion(Pantheraleo),jaguar(Pantheraonca),tiger(Pantheratigris),cheetah(Acinonyxjubatus)anddomesticcat(Felissilvestrisf.catus)".JournalofAnatomy.201(3):195–209.doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00088.x.PMC 1570911.PMID 12363272. ^Lieberman,Philip(2007)."TheEvolutionofHumanSpeech:ItsAnatomicalandNeuralBases"(PDF).CurrentAnthropology.48(1):39–66.doi:10.1086/509092.S2CID 28651524. ^Nishimura,T.;Mikami,A.;Suzuki,J.;Matsuzawa,T.(September2006)."Descentofthehyoidinchimpanzees:evolutionoffaceflatteningandspeech".JournalofHumanEvolution.51(3):244–54.doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.03.005.PMID 16730049. ^Lieberman,Philip;McCarthy,RobertC.;Strait,David(2006)."TheRecentOriginofHumanSpeech".TheJournaloftheAcousticalSocietyofAmerica.119(5):3441.Bibcode:2006ASAJ..119.3441L.doi:10.1121/1.4786937. ^M.Clegg2001.TheComparativeAnatomyandEvolutionoftheHumanVocalTractUnpublishedthesis,UniversityofLondon. ^JohnJ.Ohala,2000.TheirrelevanceoftheloweredlarynxinmodernManforthedevelopmentofspeech.Paris,ENST:TheEvolutionofLanguage,pp.171–172. ^Barel,Efrat;Tzischinsky,Orna(June2018)."AgeandSexDifferencesinVerbalandVisuospatialAbilities".AdvancesinCognitivePsychology.2(14):51–61.doi:10.5709/acp-0238-x.PMC 7186802.PMID 32362962. ^Fitch,W.T.(2002).Comparativevocalproductionandtheevolutionofspeech:Reinterpretingthedescentofthelarynx.InA.Wray(ed.),TheTransitiontoLanguage.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,pp.21–45. ^Turner,P.andRussell-Coulter,C.(2001)DictionaryofAncientDeities(Oxford:OUP) ^Pennock,RobertT.(2000).TowerofBabel:TheEvidenceagainsttheNewCreationism.BradfordBooks.ISBN 9780262661652. ^Lindsay,Robert(1728).ThehistoryofScotland:from21February1436.toMarch,1565.Inwhicharecontainedaccountsofmanyremarkablepassagesaltogetherdifferingfromourotherhistorians;andmanyfactsarerelated,eitherconcealedbysome,oromittedbyothers.Baskettandcompany.p. 104. ^Meena,DrRamLakhan(3August2021).CurrentTrendsofAppliedLinguistics.K.K.Publications.Retrieved9January2022. Furtherreading[edit] Allott,Robin.(1989).TheMotorTheoryofLanguageOrigin.Sussex,England:BookGuild.ISBN 978-0-86332-359-1.OCLC 21874255. Armstrong,DavidF.;Stokoe,WilliamC.;Wilcox,ShermanE.(1995).GestureandtheNatureofLanguage.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-52-146772-8. Botha,RudolfP;Everaert,Martin,eds.(2013).TheEvolutionaryEmergenceofLanguage:EvidenceandInference.Oxford,UK:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-19-965484-0.OCLC 828055639. Botha,RudolfP.;Knight,Chris(2009).ThePrehistoryofLanguage.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-19-954587-2.OCLC 819189595. Burling,Robbins(2005).TheTalkingApe:HowLanguageEvolved.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-19-927940-1.OCLC 750809912. Cangelosi,Angelo;Greco,Alberto;Harnad,Stevan(2002).AngeloCangelosi;DomenicoParisi(eds.).SymbolGroundingandtheSymbolicTheftHypothesis.SimulatingtheEvolutionofLanguage.London;NewYork:Springer.ISBN 978-1-85233-428-4.OCLC 47824669. Corballis,MichaelC.(2002).FromHandtoMouth:TheOriginsofLanguage.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-691-08803-7.OCLC 469431753. Crystal,David(1997).TheCambridgeEncyclopediaofLanguage.Cambridge;NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-521-55967-6.OCLC 34704876. deGrolier,E.(ed.),1983.TheOriginandEvolutionofLanguage.Paris:HarwoodAcademicPublishers. Dessalles,J-L.,2007.WhyWeTalk:TheEvolutionaryOriginsofLanguage.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0199563463 Dor,Dan;Knight,Chris;Lewis,Jerome(2015).TheSocialOriginsofLanguage.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-19-966533-4. Dunbar,R.I.M.(RobinIanMacDonald);Knight,Chris;Power,Camilla(1999).TheEvolutionofCulture:AnInterdisciplinaryView.Edinburgh:EdinburghUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-7486-1076-1.OCLC 807340111. Everett,DanielL.(2017).HowLanguageBegan:TheStoryofHumanity'sGreatestInvention.NewYork:Liveright.ISBN 978-0871407955. Fitch,W.Tecumseh(2010).TheEvolutionofLanguage.Cambridge:Cambridge.ISBN 978-0-521-67736-3.OCLC 428024376. Givón,Talmy;Malle,BertramF(2002).TheEvolutionofLanguageoutofPre-Language.Amsterdam;Philadelphia:J.BenjaminsPub.ISBN 978-1-58811-237-8.OCLC 223393453. Harnad,StevanR.(1976).Steklis,HorstD.;Lancaster,Jane(eds.).OriginsandEvolutionofLanguageandSpeech.AnnalsoftheNewYorkAcademyofSciences,v.280.NewYork:NewYorkAcademyofSciences.ISBN 0-89072-026-6.OCLC 2493424. Hillert,Dieter(2014).TheNatureofLanguage:Evolution,ParadigmsandCircuits.NewYork:SpringerNature.ISBN 978-1-4939-0609-3. Hurford,JamesR(1990).I.M.Roca(ed.).NativistandFunctionalExplanationsinLanguageAcquisition(PDF).Logicalissuesinlanguageacquisition.Dordrecht,HollandProvidence,R.I:ForisPublications.ISBN 9789067655064.OCLC 832515162. Hurford,JamesR.(2007).TheOriginsofMeaning:LanguageintheLightofEvolution.Oxford;NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-19-920785-5.OCLC 263645256. Hurford,JamesR.;Studdert-Kennedy,Michael.;Knight,Chris(1998).ApproachestotheEvolutionofLanguage:SocialandCognitiveBases.Cambridge,UK;NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-521-63964-4.OCLC 37742390. Kenneally,Christine.(2007).TheFirstWord:TheSearchfortheOriginsofLanguage.NewYork:Viking.ISBN 978-0-670-03490-1.OCLC 80460757. Knight,Chris(2016)."PuzzlesandMysteriesintheOriginofLanguage"(PDF).LanguageandCommunication.50:12–21.doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2016.09.002. Knight,Chris;Studdert-Kennedy,Michael.;Hurford,JamesR.(2000).TheEvolutionaryEmergenceofLanguage:SocialFunctionandtheOriginsofLinguisticForm.Cambridge;NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-521-78157-2.OCLC 807262339. Komarova,NataliaL.(2006).LEGrinin;VictorCDeMunck;AVKorotaev;Rossiĭskiĭgosudarstvennyĭgumanitarnyĭuniversitet.(eds.).LanguageandMathematics:Anevolutionarymodelofgrammaticalcommunication.Historyandmathematics.Analyzingandmodelingglobaldevelopment.[Moskva]:URSS.pp. 164–179.ISBN 978-5-484-01001-1.OCLC 182730511. Lenneberg,E.H.1967.BiologicalFoundationsofLanguage.NewYork:Wiley.ISBN 9780471526261 Leroi-Gourhan,A.1993.GestureandSpeech.Trans.A.BostockBerger.Cambridge,Massachusetts:MITPress.ISBN 9780262121736 Lieberman,Philip.(1991).UniquelyHuman:TheEvolutionofSpeech,Thought,andSelflessBehavior.Cambridge,Massachusetts:HarvardUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-674-92182-5.OCLC 21764294. Lieberman,P.(2007)."TheEvolutionofHumanSpeech:ItsAnatomicalandNeuralBases"(PDF).CurrentAnthropology.48(1):39–66.doi:10.1086/509092.S2CID 28651524. Lieberman,Philip.(2006).TowardanEvolutionaryBiologyofLanguage.Cambridge,Massachusetts:BelknapPressofHarvardUniversityPress.ISBN 978-0-674-02184-6.OCLC 62766735. Logan,RobertK.2007.TheExtendedMind:TheEmergenceofLanguage,theHumanMindandCulture.Toronto:UniversityofTorontoPress.ISBN 9781442691803 MacNeilage,P.2008.TheOriginofSpeech.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.ISBN 9780199581580 Mazlumyan,Victoria2008.OriginsofLanguageandThought.ISBN 0977391515. Mithen,Stephen2006.TheSingingNeanderthals:TheOriginsofMusic,Language,MindandBody.ISBN 9780753820513 Pinker,Steven(2007).TheLanguageInstinct:HowtheMindCreatesLanguage.NewYork:HarperPerennialModernClassics.ISBN 9780061336461.OCLC 672454779. Tomasello,M.2008.OriginsofHumanCommunication.Cambridge,Massachusetts:MITPress.ISBN 9780262261203 Externallinks[edit] LookupglottogonyinWiktionary,thefreedictionary. OriginofLanguage–Givens,DavidB. BehavioralandBiologicalOriginsofModernHumans–Klein,RichardG. TheOriginofLanguage–Vajda,Edward FirstLanguageAcquisition–Vajda,Edward SpeakinginTongues:TheHistoryofLanguage DecodingChomsky:Scienceandrevolutionarypolitics–ChrisKnight vteHumanevolutionTaxonomy(Hominins)Lastcommonancestors Chimpanzee–human Gorilla–human Orangutan–human Gibbon–human Australopithecines Orrorin Sahelanthropus Kenyanthropus Ardipithecus A.kadabba A.ramidus Australopithecus A.afarensis A.africanus A.anamensis A.bahrelghazali A.deyiremeda A.garhi A.sediba Paranthropus P.aethiopicus P.boisei P.robustus Humansandproto-humans(Homo)Proto-humans H.gautengensis(?) H.habilis H.naledi H.rudolfensis(?) H.tsaichangensis(?) Homoerectus H.e.erectus H.e.georgicus H.e.lantianensis H.e.nankinensis H.e.pekinensis H.e.soloensis H.e.tautavelensis H.e.yuanmouensis Archaichumans H.antecessor Denisovans H.ergaster(?) H.floresiensis H.heidelbergensis H.longi(?) H.luzonensis H.neanderthalensis H.rhodesiensis(?) ModernhumansHomosapiens H.s.sapiens(archaichomosapiens,anatomicallymodernhumans) JebelIrhoud H.s.idaltu Cro-Magnon Manotpeople TamPaLing RedDeerCavepeople Ancestors Homohabilis→Homoergaster/Homoerectus(→Homoantecessor)?→Homoheidelbergensis→archaicHomosapiens→Homosapiens ModelsGeneralmodels Hunting Gathering Endurancerunning Aquaticape Sexualselection Self-domestication Specificmodels Diet Cooking Expensivetissue Shore-based Drunkenmonkey Behavior Killerape Cooperativeeye Lifehistory Grandmother Patriarch Topics Bipedalism Skeleton Muscles Skincolor Hair Thermoregulation Speech Language Intelligence Genderroles Originofmodernhumans RecentAfricanorigin Multiregionalorigin Archaicadmixture Behavioralmodernity Earlymigrations Recentevolution Timelines Humanevolution Humanprehistory Humantimeline Others Theorists Books Fossils Evolutionaryanthropology Category Commons EvolutionarybiologyPortal vteAnimalcommunicationConcepts Animaltraining Animallanguage Animalcognition Anecdotalcognitivism Bioacoustics Deceptioninanimals Ethology Evolutionarylinguistics FOXP2 FOXP2andhumanevolution Talkinganimals Originoflanguage Human–animalcommunication Animal-specific Birdvocalization Talkingbirds Alex Greatapelanguage(Yerkish) Whalesong Dogcommunication Catcommunication Relatedtopics Category:Talkingbirds Category:Apesfromlanguagestudies vtePrehistorictechnology Prehistory Timeline Outline StoneAge Subdivisions NewStoneAge Technology history Glossary ToolsFarming NeolithicRevolution Foundercrops NewWorldcrops Ard /plough Celt Diggingstick Domestication Goad Irrigation Secondaryproducts Sickle Terracing Foodprocessing Fire Basket Cooking Earthoven Granaries Grindingslab Groundstone Hearth AşıklıHöyük Qesemcave Manos Metate Mortarandpestle Pottery Quern-stone Storagepits Hunting Arrow Boomerang throwingstick Bowandarrow history Nets Spear spear-thrower baton harpoon woomera Schöningenspears Projectilepoints Arrowhead BareIsland Cascade Clovis Cresswell Cumberland Eden Folsom Lamoka ManisMastodon Plano Transversearrowhead Systems Gamedrivesystem Buffalojump Toolmaking Earliesttoolmaking Oldowan Acheulean Mousterian Aurignacian Clovisculture Cupstone Firehardening Gravettianculture Hafting Handaxe Grooves Langdaleaxeindustry Levalloistechnique Lithiccore Lithicreduction analysis debitage flake Lithictechnology Magdalenianculture Metallurgy Microbladetechnology Mining Prepared-coretechnique Solutreanindustry Strikingplatform Toolstone Uniface Yubetsutechnique Othertools Adze Awl bone Axe Bannerstone Blade prismatic Bonetool Bowdrill Burin Canoe Oar Pessecanoe Chopper tool Cleaver Denticulatetool Fireplough Fire-saw Hammerstone Knife Microlith Quern-stone Racloir Rope Scraper side Stonetool Tallystick Weapons Wheel illustration ArchitectureCeremonial Kiva Pyramid Standingstones megalith row Stonehenge Dwellings Neolithicarchitecture longhouse Britishmegalitharchitecture Nordicmegalitharchitecture Burdei Cave Cliffdwelling Dugout Hut Quigglyhole Jacal Longhouse Mudbrick Mehrgarh Pit-house Pueblitos Pueblo Rockshelter BlombosCave AbridelaMadeleine SibuduCave Roundhouse Stilthouse Alppiledwellings Stoneroof Wattleanddaub Watermanagement Checkdam Cistern Flushtoilet Reservoir Well Otherarchitecture Archaeologicalfeatures Broch Burntmound fulachtfiadh Causewayedenclosure Torenclosure Circularenclosure Goseck Cursus Henge Thornborough Megalithicarchitecturalelements Midden Oldestsurvivingbuildings Timbercircle Timbertrackway SweetTrack ArtsandcultureMaterialgoods Baskets Beadwork Beds Chalcolithic Clothing/textiles timeline Cosmetics Glue Hides shoes Ötzi Jewelry amberuse Mirrors Pottery Cardium Cord-marked Groovedware Linear Jōmon Unstanware Sewingneedle Weaving Wine winery winepress Prehistoricart ArtoftheUpperPaleolithic ArtoftheMiddlePaleolithic BlombosCave ListofStoneAgeart Birdstone Cairn Carvedstoneballs Cavepaintings Cupandringmark Geoglyph Goldenhats Guardianstones GwionGwionrockpaintings painting pigment Megalithicart Petroform Petroglyph Petrosomatoglyph Pictogram Rockart Rockcupule Stonecarving Sculpture Statuemenhir Stonecircle list BritishIslesandBrittany Venusfigurine Burial Burialmounds Bowlbarrow Roundbarrow MoundBuildersculture U.S.sites Chambertomb Cotswold-Severn Cist Dartmoorkistvaens Clavacairn Courttomb Cremation Dolmen Greatdolmen Funeralpyre Gallerygrave transepted wedge-shaped Gravegoods Jarburial Longbarrow unchambered Grønsalen Megalithictomb Mummy Passagegrave Rectangulardolmen Ringcairn Simpledolmen Stoneboxgrave Torcairn Unchamberedlongcairn Othercultural Archaeoastronomy sites lunarcalendar Behavioralmodernity Evolutionarymusicology musicarchaeology Evolutionaryoriginofreligions Paleolithicreligion Prehistoricreligion Spiritualdruguse Originoflanguage Prehistoriccounting Prehistoricmedicine trepanning Prehistoricmusic Alligatordrum flutes DivjeBabeflute gudi Prehistoricwarfare Symbols symbolism vteLong-rangecomparativelinguisticsConcepts Comparativemethod Etymologicaldictionary Glottochronology Lexicostatistics Linguisticreconstruction Internalreconstruction Linguisticuniversal Macrofamily Masscomparison Originoflanguage Paleolinguistics Proto-language Swadeshlist Dolgopolskylist Leipzig–Jakartalist Languagefamilies Proto-Humanlanguage Borean Amerind Nostratic Eurasiatic Altaic Ural-Altaic Indo-Uralic Dené–Caucasian NorthCaucasian Austric Indo-Pacific Linguists JohnBengtson VáclavBlažek AllanR.Bomhard SvetlanaBurlak AharonDolgopolsky VladimirDybo HaroldC.Fleming JosephGreenberg EugeneHelimski MurrayGell-Mann VladislavIllich-Svitych FrederikKortlandt AlexisManasterRamer SergeiNikolaev SorinPaliga HolgerPedersen IliaPeiros MartineRobbeets MerrittRuhlen VitalyShevoroshkin GeorgiyStarostin SergeiStarostin AlfredoTrombetti Journals JournalofLanguageRelationship MotherTongue Books EtymologicalDictionaryoftheAltaicLanguages TheLanguagesofAfrica Institutionsandschools EvolutionofHumanLanguages InstituteofLinguisticsoftheRussianAcademyofSciences MoscowSchoolofComparativeLinguistics RussianStateUniversityfortheHumanities SantaFeInstitute LinguisticsportalCategory vteEvolutionarypsychology History Theoreticalfoundations Criticism Processes Adaptations Altruism Cheating Reciprocal Baldwineffect By-products Cognitivemodule Automatic/Controlled Evolutionarilystablestrategy Exaptation Fitness Inclusive Kinselection Mismatch Naturalselection Parentalinvestment Sexualselection Male/Femaleintrasexualcompetition Matechoice Sexualdimorphism Socialselection Areas Aesthetics Literarycriticism Musicology Anthropology Biological Crime Lead–crimehypothesis Culture Behavioralmodernity Universals Development Attachment Bonding Affectional/Maternal/Paternalbond Caregiverdeprivation Childhoodattachment Cognitivedevelopment Personalitydevelopment Socialization Education Emotion Affect Affectdisplay Displayrules Facialexpression Fight-or-flightresponse Intelligence Flynneffect Multitasking Theoryofmind Wasonselectiontask Language Origin Psychology Speech Mentalhealth Cinderellaeffect Depression Digitalmediauseandmentalhealth Hypophobia Mind-blindness Ranktheoryofdepression Schizophrenia Screentime Sexdifferences Morality Moralfoundations Religion Origin Sexdifferences Autism Cognition Crime Divisionoflabour Emotionalintelligence Empathising–systemisingtheory Intelligence Memory Narcissism Schizophrenia Suicide Variabilityhypothesis Sexuality Male/Female Activity Adultattachment Agedisparity Coolidgeeffect Desire Fantasy Jealousy Mateguarding Matingpreferences Matingstrategies Orientation Pairbond Physical/Sexualattraction Sexysonhypothesis Westermarckeffect PeopleBiologists/neuroscientists JohnCrook CharlesDarwin RichardDawkins JaredDiamond W.D.Hamilton PeterKropotkin GordonOrians JaakPanksepp MargieProfet PeterRicherson GiacomoRizzolatti RandyThornhill RobertTrivers CarelvanSchaik ClausWedekind MaryJaneWest-Eberhard WolfgangWickler GeorgeC.Williams DavidSloanWilson E.O.Wilson RichardWrangham Anthropologists JeromeH.Barkow ChristopherBoehm RobertBoyd DonaldE.Brown NapoleonChagnon RobinDunbar DanielFessler MarkFlinn JohnD.Hawks JosephHenrich RuthMace DanielNettle StephenShennan DonaldSymons JohnTooby PierrevandenBerghe Behavioraleconomists /politicalscientists SamuelBowles ErnstFehr HerbertGintis DominicD.P.Johnson GadSaad Literarytheorists /philosophers EdmundBurke JosephCarroll DanielDennett DenisDutton ThomasHobbes DavidHume Psychologists /cognitivescientists MaryAinsworth SimonBaron-Cohen JustinL.Barrett JayBelsky JesseBering DavidF.Bjorklund PaulBloom JohnBowlby PascalBoyer JosephBulbulia DavidBuss JosepCall AnneCampbell DonaldT.Campbell PeterCarruthers NoamChomsky LedaCosmides MartinDaly PaulEkman BruceJ.Ellis AnneFernald AurelioJoséFigueredo DianaFleischman UtaFrith DavidC.Geary GerdGigerenzer JonathanHaidt HarryHarlow JudithRichHarris StephenKaplan DouglasT.Kenrick SimonM.Kirby RobertKurzban BrianMacWhinney MichaelT.McGuire GeoffreyMiller DarciaNarvaez KatherineNelson RandolphM.Nesse StevenNeuberg DavidPerrett StevenPinker PaulRozin MarkSchaller DavidP.Schmitt NancySegal ToddK.Shackelford RogerShepard IrwinSilverman PeterK.Smith DanSperber AnthonyStevens FrankSulloway MichaelTomasello MarkvanVugt AndrewWhiten GlennWilson MargoWilson Researchcenters/organizations CenterforEvolutionaryPsychology HumanBehaviorandEvolutionSociety MaxPlanckInstituteforEvolutionaryAnthropology MaxPlanckInstituteforHumanCognitiveandBrainSciences NewEnglandComplexSystemsInstitute Publications TheAdaptedMind EvolutionandHumanBehavior TheEvolutionofHumanSexuality Evolution,MindandBehaviour EvolutionaryBehavioralSciences EvolutionaryPsychology Relatedsubjects Behavioral/Evolutionaryeconomics Behavioralepigenetics Behaviouralgenetics Behavioral/Cognitive/Evolutionaryneuroscience Bioculturalanthropology Cognitivescience Cognitivepsychology Cognitivism Computationaltheoryofmind Philosophyofmind Culturalevolution Culturalselectiontheory Memetics Multilinealevolution Neoevolutionism Socioculturalevolution Unilinealevolution Determinism/Indeterminism Biologicaldeterminism Connectionism Environmentaldeterminism Natureversusnurture Psychologicalnativism Socialconstructionism Socialdeterminism Standardsocialsciencemodel Ethology Evolutionarymedicine CriticismofFacebook Humanfactorsandergonomics Socialaspectsoftelevision Textingwhiledriving Functionalpsychology Modularityofmind Domaingenerality Domainspecificity Dualprocesstheory Primatology Sociobiology Unitofselection Coevolution Culturalgroupselection Dualinheritancetheory Gene-centeredviewofevolution Groupselection Hologenometheory Lamarckism Punctuatedequilibrium Recenthumanevolution Transgenerationalepigeneticinheritance Evolutionarypsychology Psychologyportal Evolutionarybiologyportal Authoritycontrol:Nationallibraries Germany Israel UnitedStates CzechRepublic Retrievedfrom"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Origin_of_language&oldid=1112029551" Categories:EvolutionoflanguageHumanevolutionPaleolithicUnsolvedproblemsinlinguisticsCausesofeventsTheoriesoflanguageOriginsHiddencategories:WikipediaarticlesneedingclarificationfromAugust2022AllarticleswithincompletecitationsArticleswithincompletecitationsfromJanuary2015WikipediaarticlesneedingpagenumbercitationsfromMarch2017AllWikipediaarticlesneedingclarificationCS1errors:missingperiodicalArticleswithincompletecitationsfromMay2020ArticleswithshortdescriptionShortdescriptionmatchesWikidataUsedmydatesfromMay2020ArticlesneedingadditionalreferencesfromJuly2017AllarticlesneedingadditionalreferencesWikipediaarticleswithstyleissuesfromFebruary2018AllarticleswithstyleissuesArticleswithmultiplemaintenanceissuesArticlescontainingpotentiallydatedstatementsfrom2018AllarticlescontainingpotentiallydatedstatementsAllarticleswithunsourcedstatementsArticleswithunsourcedstatementsfromNovember2017WikipediaarticleswithstyleissuesfromMay2021ArticleswithunsourcedstatementsfromMay2018Allarticleswithspecificallymarkedweasel-wordedphrasesArticleswithspecificallymarkedweasel-wordedphrasesfromMay2021ArticleswithunsourcedstatementsfromJanuary2014AllarticleswithvagueorambiguoustimeVagueorambiguoustimefromMay2021ArticleswithunsourcedstatementsfromDecember2018WikipediaarticlesneedingpagenumbercitationsfromMay2020ArticleswithunsourcedstatementsfromMay2021ArticlesneedingadditionalreferencesfromMay2021ArticlesusinginfoboxtemplateswithnodatarowsWikipediaarticlesneedingclarificationfromMay2021ArticleswithGNDidentifiersArticleswithJ9UidentifiersArticleswithLCCNidentifiersArticleswithNKCidentifiers Navigationmenu Personaltools NotloggedinTalkContributionsCreateaccountLogin Namespaces ArticleTalk English Views ReadEditViewhistory More Search Navigation MainpageContentsCurrenteventsRandomarticleAboutWikipediaContactusDonate Contribute HelpLearntoeditCommunityportalRecentchangesUploadfile Tools WhatlinkshereRelatedchangesUploadfileSpecialpagesPermanentlinkPageinformationCitethispageWikidataitem Print/export DownloadasPDFPrintableversion Languages AfrikaansالعربيةবাংলাCatalàCymraegDeutschEestiEspañolEsperantoEuskaraفارسیFrançais한국어Հայերենहिन्दीBahasaIndonesiaItalianoქართულიLatinaMagyarNederlands日本語PortuguêsРусскийසිංහලСрпски/srpskiSuomiSvenskaதமிழ்TürkçeУкраїнськаTiếngViệt中文 Editlinks
延伸文章資訊
- 1(PDF) The Origins of Language - ResearchGate
5- The Genetic Source. • The innateness hypothesis is a linguistic theory of language acquisition...
- 2The origin of language: Evolution's greatest mystery
His theory is that a possible genetic mutation in one of our human ancestors gave them the abilit...
- 3Innateness, Evolution, and Genetics of Language - jstor
Theories also differ crucially on this dimension. We begin with a nonadaptationist account that h...
- 4Language and genetics | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Genetic methods have revolutionized research into many aspects of languages, including the tracin...
- 5Origin of language - Wikipedia
The origin of language its relationship with human evolution, and its consequences have been ... ...