GPD Win Max 2021手持式游戏笔记本电脑评测。Ryzen 7比 ...

GPD Win Max去年年底推出了10代英特尔Ice Lake 选项。

对于2021年，制造商已经刷新了该模型，采用了更新更快的第11代Tiger Lake CPU，甚至为AMD粉丝提供 ... GPDWinMax2021手持式游戏笔记本电脑评测。

Ryzen7比Corei7更慢对于游戏来说，英特尔在关键的地方更快。

WinMax在纸面上听起来很好，其便携的外形对于手持游戏来说很有吸引力，但是有足够的缺点让我们在为这款Windows10UMPC投入1000美元时踩下了刹车。

AllenNgo,👁AllenNgo(translatedbyDeepL/StefanHinum),08/30/2021🇺🇸🇳🇱... 🇫🇷🇪🇸🇵🇹🇮🇹🇩🇪GamingAMDZenRyzen(Zen)Console 4Reviews,News,CPU,GPU,Articles,Columns,Other"or"searchrelation.3DPrinting,5G,Accessory,AI,AlderLake,AMD,Android,Apple,ARM,Audio,Benchmark,Biotech,Business,Camera,CannonLake,Cezanne(Zen3),Charts,ChineseTech,Chromebook,CoffeeLake,CometLake,Console,Convertible/2-in-1,Cryptocurrency,Cyberlaw,Deal,Desktop,E-Mobility,Education,Exclusive,Fail,Foldable,Gadget,GalaxyNote,GalaxyS,Gamecheck,Gaming,Geforce,GooglePixel,GPU,HowTo,IceLake,Intel,IntelEvo,InternetofThings(IoT),iOS,iPad,iPadPro,iPhone,JasperLake,Lakefield,Laptop/Notebook,Launch,Leaks/Rumors,Linux/Unix,List,Lucienne(Zen2),MacBook,MiniPC,Monitor,MSI,OnePlus,Opinion/Kommentar,Phablet,Radeon,RaptorLake,Renoir,ReviewSnippet,RocketLake,Ryzen(Zen),Science,Security,Single-BoardComputer(SBC),SmartHome,Smartphone,Smartwatch,Software,Storage,Tablet,ThinkPad,Thunderbolt,TigerLake,Touchscreen,Ultrabook,VirtualReality(VR)/AugmentedReality(AR),Wearable,Wi-Fi7,Windows,Workstation,XPS,Zen3(Vermeer),Zen4Ticker  左：GPDWinMax，右：GPDWin3GPDWin3GPDWinMax去年年底推出了10代英特尔IceLake选项。

对于2021年，制造商已经刷新了该模型，采用了更新更快的第11代TigerLakeCPU，甚至为AMD粉丝提供了Zen2选项。

我们这里的测试单元配备了Ryzen74800U和集成的RadeonRXVega8GPU。

虽然AMD后来转向移动的Zen3CPU，如Ryzen75800U但较早的Ryzen74800U仍然是目前最快的U系列CPU之一。

请看Indiegogo的官方网页。

了解更多关于WinMax和它的功能。

1000美元的价格标签与许多传统超极本处于同一水平，因为WinMax本质上是一台具有现代超极本性能和端口的UMPC。

更多GPD评论。

GPDWin3 good(79%) GPDWinMax2021 AMDRyzen74800UAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) UMPC-08/30/2021-v7 TestdevicecourtesyofGPD DownloadyourlicensedratingimageasPNG/SVG GPD WinMax2021ProcessorAMDRyzen74800U8x1.8-4.2 GHz,22 W PL2/ShortBurst,20 W PL1/Sustained,Renoir(Zen2)GraphicsadapterAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000)-2048MB,Memory:1333 MHz,LPDDR4,21.6.1Memory16384 MB ,1600MHz,40-39-45-90,Dual-ChannelDisplay8.00inch16:10,1280x800pixel189PPI,Yes,LT7911D,IPS,LTM08E1controller,glossy: yes,60 HzMainboardAMDPromontory/BixbyFCHStorageBIWINNS200512GBCNF82GS1G00-512,512 GB SoundcardAMDRaven/Renoir/VanGogh/Cezanne/Rembrandt/Raphael-HDAudioControllerConnections4USB3.0/3.1Gen1,2USB3.1Gen2,USB-CPowerDelivery(PD),1HDMI,AudioConnections:3.5mmcombo,CardReader:MicroSDNetworkingIntelEthernetControllerI225-V(10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s),IntelDualBandWireless-AC7265(a/b/g/h/n=Wi-Fi 4/ac=Wi-Fi 5),Bluetooth4.2Sizeheightxwidthxdepth(inmm):26x207x145Battery57 WhLithium-IonOperatingSystemMicrosoftWindows10Home64BitAdditionalfeaturesSpeakers:Stereo,Keyboard:Chiclet,KeyboardLight:no,12MonthsWarrantyWeight850 g,PowerSupply:156 g Price1000 USDNote:Themanufacturermayusecomponentsfromdifferentsuppliersincludingdisplaypanels,drivesormemorystickswithsimilarspecifications.seeallspecifications  »Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top10排名»Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top10排名»Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top10排名»Notebookcheck变形本产品Top10排名»Notebookcheck平板电脑Top10排名»Notebookcheck智能手机Top10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top10排名»Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top10排名 potentialcompetitorsincomparison RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBestPrice79.3 %08/2021GPDWinMax2021R74800U,Vega8R4000850 g26 mm8.00"1280x800GPDWin3i5-1135G7,IrisXeG780EUs553 g27 mm5.50"1280x72084.4 %08/2021HPPavilionAero13be0097nrR75800U,Vega8R5000953 g17 mm13.30"1920x120084.7 %08/2021LenovoYoga61382ND0009USR55500U,Vega71.3 kg18.2 mm13.30"1920x108086.3 %AsusZenBookFlip13UX363EA-HP069Ti7-1165G7,IrisXeG796EUs1.2 kg13 mm13.30"1920x108088.5 %06/2021AsusZenBook13UX325EAi7-1165G7,IrisXeG796EUs1.2 kg13.9 mm13.30"1920x1080 案例从外观上看，该机箱结构紧凑，灰色金属表面光滑，视觉设计出色。

然而，拿在手上，即使是简单的动作，如打开盖子或抓紧底座的两侧，系统也很容易发出吱吱声。

由于所有的吱吱作响，该机箱并不带有强烈的豪华感。

对于超过一千美元的产品，制造商当然可以在这方面做得更好。

底盘表现出大量的吱嘎声 系统很重，最好在膝上或桌上使用。

铰链的硬度令人满意，但在调整角度时吱吱作响的声音太大 沿着系统的后部和底部有很多的通风栅栏。

铰链可以完全打开180度 平滑的金属底盘是由与Win3类似的材料制成的       GPDWinMax2021      GPDWin3      ChuwiMiniBookCWI526❌207mm 145mm 26mm 850g198mm 92mm 27mm 553g201mm 128.6mm 19.3mm 662g 连接性对于这样一个小设计来说，端口选项是丰富的。

不幸的是，我们的AMD设备不支持DisplayPort-over-USB-C，这意味着用户必须使用HDMI端口来连接外部显示器。

选择英特尔版本的WinMax将授予两个USB-C端口的Thunderbolt4兼容性。

沿着左侧边缘的开关可以切换控制器的输入，详情如下这里详述在Win3上。

前部：3.5毫米耳机 右边。

千兆位RJ-45，MicroSD读卡器 后部：HDMI2.0b，2个USB-A3.2Gen.1，2个USB-C3.2Gen.2 左：控制器/鼠标切换SD卡阅读器虽然该系统集成了一个MicroSD读卡器，但它在我们的预生产设备上根本无法工作。

我们尝试插入UHS-I和UHS-II卡，但都无法识别。

我们建议用户在购买时立即测试一下MicroSD卡插槽。

沟通令人失望的是，WinMax配备的是英特尔7265，而不是更新更快的英特尔AX200/201。

这意味着该系统不支持Wi-Fi6的速度，在将WinMax与Win3等由英特尔驱动的设备进行比较时就可以看出这一点。

不可拆卸的WLAN模块 Networkingiperf3Client(transmit)1m4Mx10NetgearAX12AsusZenBookFlip13UX363EA-HP069TIntelWi-Fi6AX201 1301(929min-1479max)MBit/s∼100%+219%GPDWin3IntelWi-Fi6AX200 1221(796min-1383max)MBit/s∼94%+199%AsusZenBook13UX325EAIntelWi-Fi6AX201 940(858min-985max)MBit/s∼72%+130%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USRealTekSemiconductorRTL8852AE 672(630min-730max)MBit/s∼52%+65%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrRealTekSemiconductorRTL8852AE 661(550min-752max)MBit/s∼51%+62%GPDWinMax2021IntelDualBandWireless-AC7265 408(334min-444max)MBit/s∼31%iperf3Client(receive)1m4Mx10NetgearAX12AsusZenBook13UX325EAIntelWi-Fi6AX201 1542(1352min-1664max)MBit/s∼100%+138%GPDWin3IntelWi-Fi6AX200 1427(1039min-1512max)MBit/s∼93%+120%AsusZenBookFlip13UX363EA-HP069TIntelWi-Fi6AX201 1357(1148min-1476max)MBit/s∼88%+109%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrRealTekSemiconductorRTL8852AE 849(770min-905max)MBit/s∼55%+31%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USRealTekSemiconductorRTL8852AE 819(781min-853max)MBit/s∼53%+26%GPDWinMax2021IntelDualBandWireless-AC7265 649(528min-678max)MBit/s∼42% 050100150200250300350400450500550600650Tooltip;iperf3Client(receive)1m4Mx10NetgearAX12;iperf3.1.3:Ø649(528-678);iperf3Client(transmit)1m4Mx10NetgearAX12;iperf3.1.3:Ø408(334-444) 维护底部面板需要一把超小的飞利浦螺丝刀来拆卸。

内存和WLAN都是焊接的，这意味着用户只能在需要时升级SSD或更换电池。

配件和保修除了USB-C交流适配器之外，盒子里没有任何额外的东西。

标准的一年有限制造商保修适用。

对于海外买家来说，申请保修可能需要漫长的等待。

输入设备键盘 我们不能指责背光键盘的拥挤，因为对于其8英寸的外形因素来说，这是可以预期的。

如果你打算经常在WinMax上打字，肯定需要一些时间来适应这种奇怪的布局和小键。

控制器的按钮使用起来不是很舒服。

特别是肩部按钮的行程和反馈，分别太窄和太软。

此外，操纵杆的运动范围非常窄，甚至比任天堂的JoyCons还要小。

因此，精确的动作在这里很难完成，特别是对于拇指较大的用户。

涡轮风扇模式可以用Fn+F键来切换。

然而，屏幕上没有显示涡轮模式是否激活的指示灯，这意味着有时很难知道在任何特定时刻的风扇模式。

触摸板支持Precision的小型点击板（5.8x3.3厘米）具有出色的牵引力，在较慢的速度下有一点粘性。

不幸的是，光标在缓慢滑行时可能会出现跳动和反应迟钝，这可能会使精确点击变得非常困难。

使用触摸屏而不是小小的点击板进行输入要容易得多，也可靠得多。

令人惊讶的是，在主要的QWERTY键之间，按键的反馈是坚定和统一的。

因此，咔哒声比较大 方向盘和主按钮有很好的反馈... ...但操纵杆的全部范围太窄了显示8英寸的触摸屏显然比Win3的5.5英寸触摸屏要大，但这就是优势所在。

从响应时间、亮度和色彩来看，其他一切都比Win3的显示屏慢得多、暗得多、浅得多。

这绝不是一个差劲的显示屏，但从我们在Win3上的体验来看，它比我们所知道的制造商的能力要低一个档次。

改用OLED实际上可以解决我们对这个特殊的IPS面板的重影、颜色和对比度的担忧。

边缘到边缘的大猩猩玻璃5保护 四面都有厚厚的边框 沿着边缘和角落的中度不均匀背光出血 大猩猩玻璃层有些厚，因此颜色不像通常在iPad或高端智能手机上那样突出。

346.2cd/m²371.9cd/m²362.2cd/m²344cd/m²374.6cd/m²371.1cd/m²344.9cd/m²368.5cd/m²367.1cd/m² DistributionofbrightnessLT7911DX-Ritei1Pro2Maximum:374.6 cd/m²(Nits)Average:361.2 cd/m²Minimum:28.51 cd/m²BrightnessDistribution: 92%CenteronBattery:374.6 cd/m²Contrast:832:1(Black:0.45 cd/m²)ΔEColor6.21|0.59-29.43Ø5.4,calibrated: 5.4ΔEGreyscale4.5|0.64-98Ø5.647.6% AdobeRGB 1998(Argyll2.2.03D)65.2% sRGB(Argyll2.2.03D)47.2% Display P3(Argyll2.2.03D)Gamma:2.49DownloadICCFile(X-Ritei1Pro2) GPDWinMax2021LT7911D,IPS,8.00,1280x800GPDWin3IPS,5.50,1280x720HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAUOptronicsAUO6496,IPS,13.30,1920x1200LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAUOptronicsB133HAN05.F,IPS,13.30,1920x1080AsusZenBookFlip13UX363EA-HP069TSamsung,SDC414A,OLED,13.30,1920x1080AsusZenBook13UX325EASamsungSDC4155(ATNA33XC09-0),OLED,13.30,1920x1080Display31%55%50%90%DisplayP3Coverage47.259.526%73.456%69.748%99.9112%sRGBCoverage65.289.637%99.853%99.252%10053%AdobeRGB1998Coverage47.661.429%74.857%71.450%97.5105%ResponseTimes31%21%21%40%40%ResponseTimeGrey50%/Grey80%*56.8?(28.4,28.4)40?(22,18)30%42.4?(22.4,20)25%46.8?(20.8,26)18%2?(1,1)96%2?(1,1)96%ResponseTimeBlack/White*37.6?(22,15.6)25.6?(13.6,12)32%31.6?(17.6,14)16%28.8?(15.6,13.2)23%2?(1,1)95%2?(1,1)95%PWMFrequency201.6?(99)60-70%60?(90)-70%Screen-11%37%22%8%33%Brightnessmiddle374.6468.825%473.927%291.5-22%353-6%3904%Brightness36146027%45827%294-19%359-1%3682%BrightnessDistribution92931%91-1%931%953%66-28%BlackLevel*0.450.45-0%0.3620%0.1958%0.178%Contrast832104225%131658%153484%3530324%ColorcheckerdE2000*6.219-45%2.9952%3.8338%3.9836%2.0367%ColorcheckerdE2000max.*9.8915.5-57%4.3556%8.4315%53.07-437%3.1468%ColorcheckerdE2000calibrated*5.41.9165%1.180%1.0780%3.143%GreyscaledE2000*4.510.9-142%411%6.2-38%1.4169%1.2872%Gamma2.4988%2.13103%2.3594%2.2100%2.3992%2.492%CCT672697%1097259%6269104%6469100%6346102%6359102%ColorSpace(PercentofAdobeRGB1998)56.687ColorSpace(PercentofsRGB)89.2100TotalAverage(Program/Settings)17%/ 4%38%/ 38%31%/ 28%24%/ 17%54%/ 48%*...smallerisbetter 因此，虽然WinMax的显示屏比Win3大，但后者的颜色更深、更准确。

vs.sRGB vs.DCI-P3X-Rite色度计的测量结果显示，色温略微偏冷。

一旦正确校准，平均灰度和ColorCheckerDeltaE值将分别从4.5提高到2.3和6.2提高到5.4。

由于面板的色彩空间有限，颜色在较高的饱和度下仍然变得越来越不准确。

校准前的灰度 校准前的饱和扫频 校准前的ColorChecker 校准后的灰度 校准后的饱和扫频 校准后的ColorChecker DisplayResponseTimesℹDisplayresponsetimesshowhowfastthescreenisabletochangefromonecolortothenext.Slowresponsetimescanleadtoafterimagesandcancausemovingobjectstoappearblurry(ghosting).Gamersoffast-paced3Dtitlesshouldpayspecialattentiontofastresponsetimes.   ↔   ResponseTimeBlacktoWhite37.6ms...rise↗andfall↘combined↗22msrise↘15.6msfallThescreenshowsslowresponseratesinourtestsandwillbeunsatisfactoryforgamers.Incomparison,alltesteddevicesrangefrom0.8(minimum)to240(maximum)ms.»94 %ofalldevicesarebetter.Thismeansthatthemeasuredresponsetimeisworsethantheaverageofalltesteddevices(23.4ms).   ↔   ResponseTime50%Greyto80%Grey56.8ms...rise↗andfall↘combined↗28.4msrise↘28.4msfallThescreenshowsslowresponseratesinourtestsandwillbeunsatisfactoryforgamers.Incomparison,alltesteddevicesrangefrom0.692(minimum)to636(maximum)ms.»92 %ofalldevicesarebetter.Thismeansthatthemeasuredresponsetimeisworsethantheaverageofalltesteddevices(37ms). ScreenFlickering/PWM(Pulse-WidthModulation)ℹTodimthescreen,somenotebookswillsimplycyclethebacklightonandoffinrapidsuccession-amethodcalledPulseWidthModulation(PWM).Thiscyclingfrequencyshouldideallybeundetectabletothehumaneye.Ifsaidfrequencyistoolow,userswithsensitiveeyesmayexperiencestrainorheadachesorevennoticetheflickeringaltogether.Screenflickering/PWMdetected201.6Hz≤ 99 %brightnesssettingThedisplaybacklightflickersat201.6 Hz(LikelyutilizingPWM)Flickeringdetectedatabrightnesssettingof99 %andbelow.ThereshouldbenoflickeringorPWMabovethisbrightnesssetting.Thefrequencyof201.6 Hzisrelativelylow,sosensitiveuserswilllikelynoticeflickeringandexperienceeyestrainatthestatedbrightnesssettingandbelow.Incomparison:52 %ofalltesteddevicesdonotusePWMtodimthedisplay.IfPWMwasdetected,anaverageof21913(minimum:5-maximum:3846000)Hzwasmeasured. 户外能见度只有在阴凉处才会好，因为那里的眩光更容易控制。

我们建议禁用AMDVari-Bright，否则在电池供电的情况下，最大亮度将自动从374尼特降至300尼特。

在户外阳光直射下 在户外的阴凉处 在户外阳光直射下 宽广的IPS可视角度。

如果从极端角度观看，对比度和色彩会下降 业绩 处理器AMDRyzen74800U是为大型超极本设计的，所以在较小的8英寸外形尺寸上看到它是不常见的。

原始多线程性能非常好，基本上与Ryzen74700U齐头并进。

Ryzen74700U甚至是Ryzen75800U.另一方面，单线程性能比竞争者的Corei7-1165G7慢15%至20%。

酷睿i7-1165G7.CinebenchR15MultiLoop 07014021028035042049056063070077084091098010501120119012601330TooltipGPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U;CPUMulti64Bit:Ø1274(1269.36-1281.19)GPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7;CPUMulti64Bit:Ø716(710.19-722.13)HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRyzen75800U;CPUMulti64Bit:Ø1313(1297.77-1389.66)LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRyzen55500U;CPUMulti64Bit:Ø960(551.99-995.3)AsusZenBookFlip13UX363EA-HP069TIntelCorei7-1165G7;CPUMulti64Bit:Ø498(404.92-730.41)AsusZenBook13UX325EAIntelCorei7-1165G7;CPUMulti64Bit:Ø644(604.98-860.99) CinebenchR20:CPU(MultiCore)|CPU(SingleCore)CinebenchR23:CPU(MultiCore)|CPU(SingleCore)CinebenchR15:CPUMulti64Bit|CPUSingle64BitBlender2.79:BMW27CPU7-Zip18.03:7zb4-mmt1|7zb4Geekbench5.3:64BitSingle-CoreScore|64BitMulti-CoreScoreHWBOTx265Benchmarkv2.2:4kPresetLibreOffice:20DocumentsToPDFRBenchmark2.5:OverallmeanCinebenchR20/CPU(MultiCore)AverageAMDRyzen74800U (2943-3306,n=4) 3178Points∼100%+8%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRyzen74700U 3095Points∼97%+5%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRyzen75800U 3092Points∼97%+5%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U 2943Points∼93%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRyzen55500U 2418Points∼76%-18%HonorMagicBook154500UAMDRyzen54500U 2347Points∼74%-20%FrameworkLaptop13.5IntelCorei7-1165G7 2119Points∼67%-28%GPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7 1842Points∼58%-37%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelCorei7-1065G7 1640Points∼52%-44%CinebenchR20/CPU(SingleCore)FrameworkLaptop13.5IntelCorei7-1165G7 580Points∼100%+21%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRyzen75800U 552Points∼95%+15%GPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7 522Points∼90%+9%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U 481Points∼83%AverageAMDRyzen74800U (474-488,n=4) 481Points∼83%0%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRyzen74700U 473Points∼82%-2%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelCorei7-1065G7 463Points∼80%-4%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRyzen55500U 456Points∼79%-5%HonorMagicBook154500UAMDRyzen54500U 439Points∼76%-9%CinebenchR23/CPU(MultiCore)AverageAMDRyzen74800U (7558-9762,n=3) 8565Points∼100%+13%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRyzen75800U 7872(7780.83min-7871.73max)Points∼92%+4%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRyzen74700U 7719Points∼90%+2%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U 7558(7503.87min-7557.75max)Points∼88%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRyzen55500U 6348(5673.44min-6347.79max)Points∼74%-16%FrameworkLaptop13.5IntelCorei7-1165G7 5477(5385.09min-5477.06max)Points∼64%-28%GPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7 4736(4640.11min-4736.25max)Points∼55%-37%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelCorei7-1065G7 4281(3308.99min-4281.37max)Points∼50%-43%CinebenchR23/CPU(SingleCore)FrameworkLaptop13.5IntelCorei7-1165G7 1507Points∼100%+22%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRyzen75800U 1415Points∼94%+15%GPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7 1364Points∼91%+11%AverageAMDRyzen74800U (1231-1240,n=3) 1235Points∼82%0%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U 1231Points∼82%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRyzen74700U 1217Points∼81%-1%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelCorei7-1065G7 1212Points∼80%-2%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRyzen55500U 1172Points∼78%-5%CinebenchR15/CPUMulti64BitAverageAMDRyzen74800U (1281-1639,n=3) 1444Points∼100%+13%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRyzen75800U 1390(1297.77min-1389.66max)Points∼96%+9%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U 1281(1269.36min-1281.19max)Points∼89%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRyzen74700U 1240Points∼86%-3%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRyzen55500U 995(551.99min-995.3max)Points∼69%-22%HonorMagicBook154500UAMDRyzen54500U 934(873.29min-934.25max)Points∼65%-27%FrameworkLaptop13.5IntelCorei7-1165G7 850(812.27min-850.43max)Points∼59%-34%GPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7 722(710.19min-722.13max)Points∼50%-44%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelCorei7-1065G7 663(525.18min-663.12max)Points∼46%-48%CinebenchR15/CPUSingle64BitHPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRyzen75800U 229Points∼100%+25%FrameworkLaptop13.5IntelCorei7-1165G7 224Points∼98%+22%GPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7 200Points∼87%+9%AverageAMDRyzen74800U (182-187,n=3) 184Points∼80%+1%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U 183Points∼80%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelCorei7-1065G7 182Points∼79%-1%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRyzen74700U 178Points∼78%-3%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRyzen55500U 177Points∼77%-3%HonorMagicBook154500UAMDRyzen54500U 172Points∼75%-6%Blender2.79/BMW27CPUInfinixINBookX1ProIntelCorei7-1065G7 710Seconds*∼100%-90%GPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7 648Seconds*∼91%-73%HonorMagicBook154500UAMDRyzen54500U 566Seconds*∼80%-51%FrameworkLaptop13.5IntelCorei7-1165G7 551Seconds*∼78%-47%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRyzen74700U 479Seconds*∼67%-28%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRyzen55500U 469Seconds*∼66%-25%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U 374Seconds*∼53%AverageAMDRyzen74800U (322-374,n=3) 345Seconds*∼49%+8%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRyzen75800U 331Seconds*∼47%+11%7-Zip18.03/7zb4-mmt1FrameworkLaptop13.5IntelCorei7-1165G7 5405MIPS∼100%+22%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRyzen75800U 5405MIPS∼100%+22%GPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7 4761MIPS∼88%+8%AverageAMDRyzen74800U (4420-4603,n=3) 4486MIPS∼83%+1%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U 4420MIPS∼82%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelCorei7-1065G7 4389MIPS∼81%-1%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRyzen74700U 4362MIPS∼81%-1%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRyzen55500U 4325MIPS∼80%-2%HonorMagicBook154500UAMDRyzen54500U 4302MIPS∼80%-3%7-Zip18.03/7zb4HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRyzen75800U 43633MIPS∼100%+13%AverageAMDRyzen74800U (38654-44804,n=3) 41192MIPS∼94%+7%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U 38654MIPS∼89%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRyzen74700U 33282MIPS∼76%-14%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRyzen55500U 33250MIPS∼76%-14%HonorMagicBook154500UAMDRyzen54500U 25815MIPS∼59%-33%FrameworkLaptop13.5IntelCorei7-1165G7 24436MIPS∼56%-37%GPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7 21683MIPS∼50%-44%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelCorei7-1065G7 20740MIPS∼48%-46%Geekbench5.3/64BitSingle-CoreScoreGPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7 1417Points∼100%HonorMagicBook154500UAMDRyzen54500U 1220Points∼86%AverageAMDRyzen74800U (1150-1192,n=4) 1164Points∼82%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRyzen74700U 1121Points∼79%Geekbench5.3/64BitMulti-CoreScoreAverageAMDRyzen74800U (5798-6950,n=4) 6255Points∼100%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRyzen74700U 6243Points∼100%HonorMagicBook154500UAMDRyzen54500U 6234Points∼100%GPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7 4924Points∼79%HWBOTx265Benchmarkv2.2/4kPresetHPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRyzen75800U 10.4fps∼100%+10%AverageAMDRyzen74800U (9.48-10.8,n=3) 10.2fps∼98%+8%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U 9.48fps∼91%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRyzen74700U 9.18fps∼88%-3%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRyzen55500U 7.59fps∼73%-20%HonorMagicBook154500UAMDRyzen54500U 7.33fps∼70%-23%FrameworkLaptop13.5IntelCorei7-1165G7 7.05fps∼68%-26%GPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7 6.17fps∼59%-35%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelCorei7-1065G7 5.6fps∼54%-41%LibreOffice/20DocumentsToPDFLenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRyzen74700U 67.3s*∼100%-10%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRyzen55500U 66.4s*∼99%-9%HonorMagicBook154500UAMDRyzen54500U 65.2s*∼97%-7%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U 61.1s*∼91%AverageAMDRyzen74800U (57.8-62.6,n=3) 60.5s*∼90%+1%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelCorei7-1065G7 57s*∼85%+7%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRyzen75800U 53.9s*∼80%+12%GPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7 48.7s*∼72%+20%FrameworkLaptop13.5IntelCorei7-1165G7 45.1s*∼67%+26%RBenchmark2.5/OverallmeanInfinixINBookX1ProIntelCorei7-1065G7 0.671sec*∼100%-9%GPDWin3IntelCorei5-1135G7 0.637sec*∼95%-4%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRyzen55500U 0.636sec*∼95%-4%HonorMagicBook154500UAMDRyzen54500U 0.623sec*∼93%-2%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRyzen74700U 0.616sec*∼92%-0%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U 0.613sec*∼91%AverageAMDRyzen74800U (0.576-0.613,n=3) 0.601sec*∼90%+2%FrameworkLaptop13.5IntelCorei7-1165G7 0.566sec*∼84%+8%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRyzen75800U 0.54sec*∼80%+12%*...smallerisbetter CinebenchR15CPUMulti64Bit1281Points CinebenchR15OpenGL64Bit69.8fps CinebenchR15Ref.Match64Bit98% CinebenchR15CPUSingle64Bit183Points Help...incomparison 系统性能PCMark10的结果比我们的GPDWin3略高，主要是由于与Corei5-1135G7相比，Ryzen74800U上的额外核心。

PCMark10:Score|Essentials|Productivity|DigitalContentCreationPCMark10/ScoreHPPavilionAero13be0097nrVega8R5000,R75800U,IntelSSD660pSSDPEKNW512G8 5872Points∼100%+12%AverageAMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (5233-5383,n=3) 5291Points∼90%+1%GPDWinMax2021Vega8R4000,R74800U,BIWINNS200512GBCNF82GS1G00-512 5233Points∼89%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USVega7,R55500U,WDCPCSN530SDBPMPZ-265G 5209Points∼89%0%AsusZenBook13UX325EAIrisXeG796EUs,i7-1165G7,SKHynixHFM001TD3JX013N 4839Points∼82%-8%AsusZenBookFlip13UX363EA-HP069TIrisXeG796EUs,i7-1165G7,WDCPCSN730SDBPNTY-1T00 4763Points∼81%-9%GPDWin3IrisXeG780EUs,i5-1135G7,BIWINNS2001TBCNF82GS1G02-1TB 4663Points∼79%-11%PCMark10/EssentialsAsusZenBookFlip13UX363EA-HP069TIrisXeG796EUs,i7-1165G7,WDCPCSN730SDBPNTY-1T00 10189Points∼100%+9%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrVega8R5000,R75800U,IntelSSD660pSSDPEKNW512G8 10046Points∼99%+7%AsusZenBook13UX325EAIrisXeG796EUs,i7-1165G7,SKHynixHFM001TD3JX013N 9899Points∼97%+5%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USVega7,R55500U,WDCPCSN530SDBPMPZ-265G 9789Points∼96%+4%GPDWin3IrisXeG780EUs,i5-1135G7,BIWINNS2001TBCNF82GS1G02-1TB 9769Points∼96%+4%AverageAMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (9188-9637,n=3) 9403Points∼92%0%GPDWinMax2021Vega8R4000,R74800U,BIWINNS200512GBCNF82GS1G00-512 9385Points∼92%PCMark10/ProductivityHPPavilionAero13be0097nrVega8R5000,R75800U,IntelSSD660pSSDPEKNW512G8 9089Points∼100%+12%GPDWinMax2021Vega8R4000,R74800U,BIWINNS200512GBCNF82GS1G00-512 8091Points∼89%AverageAMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (7631-8091,n=3) 7879Points∼87%-3%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USVega7,R55500U,WDCPCSN530SDBPMPZ-265G 7493Points∼82%-7%AsusZenBookFlip13UX363EA-HP069TIrisXeG796EUs,i7-1165G7,WDCPCSN730SDBPNTY-1T00 6986Points∼77%-14%AsusZenBook13UX325EAIrisXeG796EUs,i7-1165G7,SKHynixHFM001TD3JX013N 6710Points∼74%-17%GPDWin3IrisXeG780EUs,i5-1135G7,BIWINNS2001TBCNF82GS1G02-1TB 6336Points∼70%-22%PCMark10/DigitalContentCreationHPPavilionAero13be0097nrVega8R5000,R75800U,IntelSSD660pSSDPEKNW512G8 6020Points∼100%+18%AverageAMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (5123-5758,n=3) 5434Points∼90%+6%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USVega7,R55500U,WDCPCSN530SDBPMPZ-265G 5231Points∼87%+2%GPDWinMax2021Vega8R4000,R74800U,BIWINNS200512GBCNF82GS1G00-512 5123Points∼85%AsusZenBook13UX325EAIrisXeG796EUs,i7-1165G7,SKHynixHFM001TD3JX013N 4632Points∼77%-10%GPDWin3IrisXeG780EUs,i5-1135G7,BIWINNS2001TBCNF82GS1G02-1TB 4446Points∼74%-13%AsusZenBookFlip13UX363EA-HP069TIrisXeG796EUs,i7-1165G7,WDCPCSN730SDBPNTY-1T00 4121Points∼68%-20% PCMark10Score 5233 pointsHelp DPC延时LatencyMon显示在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时存在DPC延迟问题。

在我们长达1分钟的视频测试中，4K60FPS的视频播放很流畅，只有4个丢帧。

DPCLatencies/LatencyMon-interrupttoprocesslatency(max),Web,Youtube,Prime95AsusZenBookFlip13UX363EA-HP069TIrisXeG796EUs,i7-1165G7,WDCPCSN730SDBPNTY-1T00 5262μs*∼100%-97%GPDWinMax2021Vega8R4000,R74800U,BIWINNS200512GBCNF82GS1G00-512 2674μs*∼51%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USVega7,R55500U,WDCPCSN530SDBPMPZ-265G 1345μs*∼26%+50%AsusZenBook13UX325EAIrisXeG796EUs,i7-1165G7,SKHynixHFM001TD3JX013N 909μs*∼17%+66%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrVega8R5000,R75800U,IntelSSD660pSSDPEKNW512G8 903μs*∼17%+66%GPDWin3IrisXeG780EUs,i5-1135G7,BIWINNS2001TBCNF82GS1G02-1TB 858μs*∼16%+68%*...smallerisbetter 存储设备WinMax配备了一个BIWINNS200PCIe3固态硬盘，与我们在Win3上发现的一样。

性能比英特尔固态硬盘660p更快，特别是在连续写入率方面，但价格较高的三星PM981a仍然处于领先地位。

CDM8 ASSSD可访问的M.22280NVMe驱动器。

没有二级内部存储选项 GPDWinMax2021BIWINNS200512GBCNF82GS1G00-512GPDWin3BIWINNS2001TBCNF82GS1G02-1TBHPPavilionAero13be0097nrIntelSSD660pSSDPEKNW512G8LenovoYoga61382ND0009USWDCPCSN530SDBPMPZ-265GAsusZenBookFlip13UX363EA-HP069TWDCPCSN730SDBPNTY-1T00ASSSD4%-44%-69%15%SeqRead18921585-16%1616-15%1860-2%276746%SeqWrite170717764%761-55%500-71%1368-20%4KRead64.161.6-4%46.87-27%36.26-43%46.86-27%4KWrite163.6208.928%126.6-23%118.6-28%140.1-14%4K-64Read114211420%324.6-72%419-63%954-16%4K-64Write980110313%815-17%219-78%136139%AccessTimeRead*0.0380.0321%0.074-95%0.102-168%0.051-34%AccessTimeWrite*0.0760.0743%0.135-78%0.17-124%0.02271%ScoreRead13951362-2%533-62%641-54%1277-8%ScoreWrite1315148913%1018-23%388-70%163825%ScoreTotal343035734%1798-48%1300-62%35072%CopyISOMB/s1520174115%906-40%880-42%276782%CopyProgramMB/s654543-17%614-6%185.3-72%107264%CopyGameMB/s13251318-1%539-59%212.7-84%13190%CrystalDiskMark5.2/610%-25%-32%6%Write4K183.622321%128.3-30%89.2-51%143-22%Read4K70.166.5-5%50.9-27%33.09-53%50.2-28%WriteSeq181518572%971-47%988-46%19638%ReadSeq172117371%1540-11%1322-23%199016%Write4KQ32T1458.661133%53817%332.6-27%375-18%Read4KQ32T155268825%344.4-38%389.3-29%363.7-34%WriteSeqQ32T1186519484%980-47%984-47%308665%ReadSeqQ32T121061995-5%1829-13%246117%338261%Write4KQ8T8405.6Read4KQ8T8930TotalAverage(Program/Settings)7%/ 6%-35%/ -37%-51%/ -55%11%/ 12%*...smallerisbetter CrystalDiskMark5.2/6 ASSSD DiskSpdBIWINNS200512GBCNF82GS1G00-512CDM5/6ReadSeqQ32T1: 2106MB/s CDM5/6WriteSeqQ32T1: 1865MB/s CDM5/6Read4KQ32T1: 552MB/s CDM5/6Write4KQ32T1: 458.6MB/s CDM5ReadSeq: 1721MB/s CDM5WriteSeq: 1815MB/s CDM5/6Read4K: 70.1MB/s CDM5/6Write4K: 183.6MB/s CrystalDiskMark5.2/6 ASSSD DiskSpdBIWINNS200512GBCNF82GS1G00-512SequentialRead: 1892MB/s SequentialWrite: 1707MB/s 4KRead: 64.1MB/s 4KWrite: 163.6MB/s 4K-64Read: 1142MB/s 4K-64Write: 980MB/s AccessTimeRead: 0.038ms AccessTimeWrite: 0.076ms CopyISO: 1520MB/s CopyProgram: 654MB/s CopyGame: 1325MB/s ScoreRead: 1395Points ScoreWrite: 1315Points ScoreTotal: 3430Points CrystalDiskMark5.2/6 ASSSD DiskSpdBIWINNS200512GBCNF82GS1G00-512DiskSpdseq_q8t1_read: 2002MB/s DiskSpdseq_q8t1_write: 1858MB/s DiskSpdseq_read: 1592MB/s DiskSpdseq_write: 1746MB/s DiskSpd4k_q32t16_read: 1096MB/s DiskSpd4k_q32t16_write: 1025MB/s DiskSpd4k_q1t1_read: 70.4MB/s DiskSpd4k_q1t1_write: 183MB/s DiskSpdLoopseq_q8t1_read: 2084MB/s DiskThrottling:DiskSpdReadLoop,QueueDepth8 Nographdata GPU性能来自我们的图形性能RadeonRXVega8比集成RXVega8的Ryzen54500U快30%至40%。

RXVega6.然而，它仍然比Corei5和IrisXe80EU都低一个档次。

IrisXe80EUs和酷睿i7IrisXe96EUs在大多数游戏中，正如我们下面的对比图所示。

3DMark11 FireStrike FireStrikeUltra CloudGate TimeSpy   3DMark|3DMark113DMark1920x1080FireStrikeGraphicsMSISummitE14A11SCSNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650TiMax-Q,i7-1185G7 8114Points∼100%+121%AsusZenBook13UX325EAIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs,i7-1165G7 5358Points∼66%+46%GPDWin3IntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs,i5-1135G7 4846Points∼60%+32%MSIModern14B11SB-085NVIDIAGeForceMX450,i7-1165G7 4689Points∼58%+28%DellInspiron147400-VY8JWNVIDIAGeForceMX350,i7-1165G7 4371Points∼54%+19%GPDWinMax2021AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000),R74800U 3675Points∼45%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (2363-4462,n=17) 3632Points∼45%-1%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRadeonRXVega7,R74700U 3579Points∼44%-3%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000),R75800U 3399Points∼42%-8%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRadeonRXVega7,R55500U 3200Points∼39%-13%AsusZenBook14UX434FL-DB77NVIDIAGeForceMX250,i7-8565U 2945Points∼36%-20%AsusZenbook14UX433FN-A6023TNVIDIAGeForceMX150,i7-8565U 2874Points∼35%-22%HPEnvyx36013-ay0010nrAMDRadeonRXVega6(Ryzen4000/5000),R54500U 2854Points∼35%-22%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelIrisPlusGraphicsG7(IceLake64EU),i7-1065G7 2586Points∼32%-30%2560x1440TimeSpyGraphicsMSISummitE14A11SCSNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650TiMax-Q,i7-1185G7 2886Points∼100%+147%MSIModern14B11SB-085NVIDIAGeForceMX450,i7-1165G7 1968Points∼68%+69%DellInspiron147400-VY8JWNVIDIAGeForceMX350,i7-1165G7 1595Points∼55%+37%AsusZenBook13UX325EAIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs,i7-1165G7 1512Points∼52%+30%GPDWin3IntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs,i5-1135G7 1354Points∼47%+16%GPDWinMax2021AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000),R74800U 1167Points∼40%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000),R75800U 1128Points∼39%-3%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (757-1400,n=17) 1125Points∼39%-4%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRadeonRXVega7,R74700U 1076Points∼37%-8%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRadeonRXVega7,R55500U 978Points∼34%-16%AsusZenBook14UX434FL-DB77NVIDIAGeForceMX250,i7-8565U 886Points∼31%-24%AsusZenbook14UX433FN-A6023TNVIDIAGeForceMX150,i7-8565U 862Points∼30%-26%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelIrisPlusGraphicsG7(IceLake64EU),i7-1065G7 851Points∼29%-27%HPEnvyx36013-ay0010nrAMDRadeonRXVega6(Ryzen4000/5000),R54500U 821Points∼28%-30%2560x1440TimeSpyScoreMSISummitE14A11SCSNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650TiMax-Q,i7-1185G7 3015Points∼100%+127%MSIModern14B11SB-085NVIDIAGeForceMX450,i7-1165G7 2148Points∼71%+62%DellInspiron147400-VY8JWNVIDIAGeForceMX350,i7-1165G7 1752Points∼58%+32%AsusZenBook13UX325EAIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs,i7-1165G7 1657Points∼55%+25%GPDWin3IntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs,i5-1135G7 1506Points∼50%+13%GPDWinMax2021AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000),R74800U 1329Points∼44%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000),R75800U 1283Points∼43%-3%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (867-1598,n=18) 1277Points∼42%-4%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRadeonRXVega7,R74700U 1221Points∼40%-8%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRadeonRXVega7,R55500U 1107Points∼37%-17%AsusZenBook14UX434FL-DB77NVIDIAGeForceMX250,i7-8565U 990Points∼33%-26%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelIrisPlusGraphicsG7(IceLake64EU),i7-1065G7 963Points∼32%-28%AsusZenbook14UX433FN-A6023TNVIDIAGeForceMX150,i7-8565U 961Points∼32%-28%HPEnvyx36013-ay0010nrAMDRadeonRXVega6(Ryzen4000/5000),R54500U 929Points∼31%-30%3DMark111280x720PerformanceGPUMSISummitE14A11SCSNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650TiMax-Q,i7-1185G7 11538Points∼100%+114%MSIModern14B11SB-085NVIDIAGeForceMX450,i7-1165G7 8435Points∼73%+56%AsusZenBook13UX325EAIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs,i7-1165G7 6642Points∼58%+23%DellInspiron147400-VY8JWNVIDIAGeForceMX350,i7-1165G7 6208Points∼54%+15%GPDWin3IntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs,i5-1135G7 5914Points∼51%+10%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000),R75800U 5842Points∼51%+8%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (4277-7033,n=17) 5746Points∼50%+6%GPDWinMax2021AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000),R74800U 5397Points∼47%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRadeonRXVega7,R74700U 5346Points∼46%-1%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRadeonRXVega7,R55500U 5220Points∼45%-3%HPEnvyx36013-ay0010nrAMDRadeonRXVega6(Ryzen4000/5000),R54500U 4419Points∼38%-18%HonorMagicBook154500UAMDRadeonRXVega6(Ryzen4000/5000),R54500U 4173Points∼36%-23%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelIrisPlusGraphicsG7(IceLake64EU),i7-1065G7 4132Points∼36%-23%AsusZenBook14UX434FL-DB77NVIDIAGeForceMX250,i7-8565U 3585Points∼31%-34%AsusZenbook14UX433FN-A6023TNVIDIAGeForceMX150,i7-8565U 3560Points∼31%-34%1280x720PerformanceCombinedMSISummitE14A11SCSNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650TiMax-Q,i7-1185G7 9720Points∼100%+137%AsusZenBook13UX325EAIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs,i7-1165G7 6020Points∼62%+47%MSIModern14B11SB-085NVIDIAGeForceMX450,i7-1165G7 5782Points∼59%+41%GPDWin3IntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs,i5-1135G7 5707Points∼59%+39%DellInspiron147400-VY8JWNVIDIAGeForceMX350,i7-1165G7 5203Points∼54%+27%LenovoYogaSlim714ARE0582A20008GEAMDRadeonRXVega7,R74700U 4363Points∼45%+6%GPDWinMax2021AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000),R74800U 4106Points∼42%AsusZenBook14UX434FL-DB77NVIDIAGeForceMX250,i7-8565U 3943Points∼41%-4%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (2315-4969,n=17) 3834Points∼39%-7%HPPavilionAero13be0097nrAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000),R75800U 3748Points∼39%-9%AsusZenbook14UX433FN-A6023TNVIDIAGeForceMX150,i7-8565U 3707Points∼38%-10%LenovoYoga61382ND0009USAMDRadeonRXVega7,R55500U 3632Points∼37%-12%InfinixINBookX1ProIntelIrisPlusGraphicsG7(IceLake64EU),i7-1065G7 3544Points∼36%-14%HonorMagicBook154500UAMDRadeonRXVega6(Ryzen4000/5000),R54500U 3405Points∼35%-17%HPEnvyx36013-ay0010nrAMDRadeonRXVega6(Ryzen4000/5000),R54500U 3322Points∼34%-19%3DMark|3DMark11 3DMark11Performance 5675 points3DMarkCloudGateStandardScore 20095 points3DMarkFireStrikeScore 3368 points3DMarkTimeSpyScore 1329 pointsHelp...incomparison FarCry5|Dota2Reborn|FinalFantasyXVBenchmark|GTAV|TheWitcher3|X-Plane11.11|StrangeBrigadeFarCry51280x720LowPresetAA:TAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (54-115,n=6) 81.2fps∼100%+89%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (47-96,n=8) 75.9fps∼93%+77%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (58-59,n=6) 58.5fps∼72%+36%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (22-71,n=9) 50.2fps∼62%+17%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (24-67,n=38) 45.3fps∼56%+5%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 43(38min-52max)fps∼53%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (39-46,n=8) 42.8fps∼53%0%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (38-45,n=3) 42.7fps∼53%-1%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (31-46,n=7) 39fps∼48%-9%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (17-55,n=29) 36.2fps∼45%-16%1920x1080LowPresetAA:TAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (66-74,n=3) 69.3fps∼100%+201%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (41-52,n=3) 48.3fps∼70%+110%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (32-34,n=3) 33.3fps∼48%+45%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (22-47,n=7) 32fps∼46%+39%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (17-36,n=17) 26.4fps∼38%+15%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250  26fps∼38%+13%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (15-31,n=7) 23.4fps∼34%+2%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 23(20min-28max)fps∼33%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (20-25,n=5) 22.2fps∼32%-3%1920x1080MediumPresetAA:TAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (48-66,n=6) 57.3fps∼100%+187%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (24-41,n=7) 33.4fps∼58%+67%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (24-30,n=6) 26.7fps∼47%+34%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (20-34,n=9) 25.2fps∼44%+26%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (14-34,n=37) 24.1fps∼42%+21%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 20(17min-26max)fps∼35%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (17-22,n=8) 19.4fps∼34%-3%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (17-20,n=3) 18.7fps∼33%-6%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (9-27,n=27) 18.7fps∼33%-6%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (12-21,n=7) 17fps∼30%-15%1920x1080HighPresetAA:TAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (48-61,n=7) 53.4fps∼100%+181%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (26-35,n=6) 29.2fps∼55%+54%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (18-31,n=9) 23.3fps∼44%+23%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (22-25,n=6) 23fps∼43%+21%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (14-31,n=33) 23fps∼43%+21%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 19(17min-24max)fps∼36%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (16-20,n=7) 18.1fps∼34%-5%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (8-25,n=22) 17.9fps∼34%-6%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (14-18,n=3) 16.3fps∼31%-14%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (10-18,n=6) 14.8fps∼28%-22%1920x1080UltraPresetAA:TAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (44-57,n=9) 51.4fps∼100%+186%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (24-33,n=6) 27.5fps∼54%+53%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (17-29,n=7) 22.4fps∼44%+24%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (14-28,n=25) 21.9fps∼43%+22%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (20-22,n=5) 21.2fps∼41%+18%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 18(15min-22max)fps∼35%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (15-19,n=7) 17.2fps∼33%-4%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (16-16,n=2) 16fps∼31%-11%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (8-24,n=17) 15.6fps∼30%-13%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (9-16,n=6) 13.5fps∼26%-25%Dota2Reborn1280x720min(0/3)fastestAverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (98.4-186,n=6) 123.6fps∼100%+27%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (102.8-145,n=13) 123.2fps∼100%+26%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (36.1-144,n=20) 122.1fps∼99%+25%AverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (75.8-148,n=20) 120.7fps∼98%+24%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (93.4-152,n=16) 118.7fps∼96%+21%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (71-131,n=20) 108.1fps∼87%+11%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (90.1-130,n=18) 98.4fps∼80%+1%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 97.7(84min)fps∼79%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (36-148,n=99) 91.4fps∼74%-6%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (65.9-123,n=54) 83.3fps∼67%-15%1366x768med(1/3)AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (93.8-130,n=13) 110.2fps∼100%+37%AverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (69.1-136,n=20) 109.1fps∼99%+35%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (35.5-133,n=20) 108.6fps∼99%+35%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (82.9-162,n=6) 107.7fps∼98%+33%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (66.7-122.3,n=16) 92.3fps∼84%+14%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (21.8-109,n=20) 85.9fps∼78%+6%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 80.7(65.1min)fps∼73%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (64.5-106,n=18) 79.2fps∼72%-2%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (31.6-108.5,n=99) 70.2fps∼64%-13%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (28.3-116,n=54) 60.7fps∼55%-25%1920x1080high(2/3)AverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (63.3-127,n=20) 99.2fps∼100%+95%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (35.4-115,n=20) 88.3fps∼89%+74%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (64.1-85.2,n=13) 80.5fps∼81%+58%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (67.1-78.5,n=6) 71fps∼72%+40%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (8.6-77.4,n=20) 61.4fps∼62%+21%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (33.5-76.7,n=16) 53.9fps∼54%+6%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 50.8(44.6min)fps∼51%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (33.6-65,n=18) 49.6fps∼50%-2%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (31.2-88.1,n=99) 48fps∼48%-6%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (21.2-58.7,n=54) 38.7fps∼39%-24%1920x1080ultra(3/3)bestlookingAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (58.5-119,n=20) 93.2fps∼100%+94%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (34.9-104.6,n=19) 79.9fps∼86%+66%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (52.3-77.3,n=13) 71.9fps∼77%+49%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (60.2-68.9,n=6) 63.9fps∼69%+33%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (7.8-67.5,n=20) 53fps∼57%+10%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (31.4-72,n=16) 50.4fps∼54%+5%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 48.1(42.4min)fps∼52%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (31-61.2,n=18) 46.7fps∼50%-3%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (26.4-78.5,n=99) 44.7fps∼48%-7%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (20.8-52.6,n=55) 36.1fps∼39%-25%FinalFantasyXVBenchmark1280x720LiteQualityAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (54.8-87.4,n=4) 72.9fps∼100%+107%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (27.6-72.2,n=15) 57.1fps∼78%+62%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (36.5-48.6,n=4) 43.7fps∼60%+24%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (17.2-56.5,n=74) 38.1fps∼52%+8%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (33.7-41,n=4) 37.3fps∼51%+6%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (22.7-50.1,n=15) 36.4fps∼50%+3%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 35.3fps∼48%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (21.9-44.9,n=17) 34fps∼47%-4%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (23-36.9,n=7) 30fps∼41%-15%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (16.5-41.8,n=47) 29.8fps∼41%-16%1920x1080StandardQualityAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (47.7-52.4,n=5) 50.1fps∼100%+185%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (25-34.5,n=12) 28.8fps∼57%+64%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (20.4-23.2,n=4) 22fps∼44%+25%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (12.2-27.8,n=71) 21.1fps∼42%+20%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (12-25,n=13) 18.3fps∼37%+4%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (11.8-22.1,n=14) 17.7fps∼35%+1%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 17.6fps∼35%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (16.4-19,n=4) 17.6fps∼35%0%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (8.11-23.2,n=44) 16.3fps∼33%-7%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (12-17.4,n=6) 14.8fps∼30%-16%1920x1080HighQualityAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (31.8-37.6,n=6) 35.3fps∼100%+176%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (9.8-27.8,n=67) 16.6fps∼47%+30%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (12.7-21.2,n=9) 16.2fps∼46%+27%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (10.7-14.9,n=4) 13.4fps∼38%+5%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (5.91-22,n=39) 13fps∼37%+2%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 12.8fps∼36%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (7.74-17.7,n=13) 12.6fps∼36%-2%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (7.71-15.4,n=14) 12.2fps∼35%-5%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (9.9-12.2,n=3) 11fps∼31%-14%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (7-10.9,n=5) 8.88fps∼25%-31%GTAV1024x768LowestSettingspossibleAverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (141-146,n=2) 143.5fps∼100%+41%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (115-172,n=8) 142.9fps∼100%+40%AverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (99.1-178,n=6) 130.1fps∼91%+28%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (92.2-145,n=3) 124.1fps∼86%+22%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (109-123.9,n=3) 114.4fps∼80%+12%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (53.6-160,n=12) 108.6fps∼76%+6%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 102(18.8min,66.7P1-161max)fps∼71%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (55.8-110,n=15) 91.4fps∼64%-10%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (52-157,n=61) 88.3fps∼62%-13%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (36.5-104,n=32) 71.5fps∼50%-30%1920x1080LowestSettingspossibleAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (95.3-175,n=4) 136.8fps∼100%+108%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (83.4-141,n=6) 105.2fps∼77%+60%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (86.9-108.5,n=2) 97.7fps∼71%+48%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250  80.9fps∼59%+23%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (30.5-101,n=8) 70.1fps∼51%+7%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (35.1-109,n=53) 66.7fps∼49%+1%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 65.8(15min,47.6P1-121max)fps∼48%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (49.3-71.5,n=12) 60.6fps∼44%-8%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (21.5-83.8,n=23) 52.2fps∼38%-21%1366x768Normal/OffAF:4xAverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (95.8-160,n=9) 126.6fps∼100%+41%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (115-136.4,n=2) 125.7fps∼99%+40%AverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (91.6-170,n=5) 122.5fps∼97%+36%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (83-137,n=3) 114.3fps∼90%+27%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (47.1-148,n=11) 99.3fps∼78%+10%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (95.4-100.9,n=3) 97.7fps∼77%+9%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 89.9(14.6min,55.6P1-148max)fps∼71%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (48.5-98.3,n=12) 80fps∼63%-11%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (44.8-137,n=62) 74.9fps∼59%-17%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (28.9-90.5,n=32) 60.6fps∼48%-33%1920x1080Normal/OffAF:4xAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (87.8-167,n=4) 129.7fps∼100%+102%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (76.6-135,n=6) 103fps∼79%+61%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (69-108.7,n=2) 88.9fps∼69%+39%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250  82.1fps∼63%+28%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (31.7-104,n=8) 71.5fps∼55%+12%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 64.1(12.7min,45.5P1-114max)fps∼49%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (54.4-72.2,n=12) 61.7fps∼48%-4%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (29.2-109,n=50) 58.2fps∼45%-9%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (18.8-73.9,n=23) 45.8fps∼35%-29%1920x1080High/On(AdvancedGraphicsOff)AA:2xMSAA+FXAF:8xAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (67.7-102,n=6) 80.2fps∼100%+186%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (30.6-68.3,n=11) 54.1fps∼67%+93%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (45.8-47,n=2) 46.4fps∼58%+66%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (35.9-41.5,n=3) 38.6fps∼48%+38%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (25.1-35.9,n=3) 32fps∼40%+14%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 28(9.37min,20P1-98.6max)fps∼35%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (14.3-40.6,n=11) 27.3fps∼34%-2%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (13.8-29.8,n=13) 25.3fps∼32%-10%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (9.7-51.6,n=61) 23.8fps∼30%-15%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (7.81-29.5,n=32) 18.4fps∼23%-34%1920x1080HighestSettingspossibleAA:4xMSAA+FXAF:16xAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (38.1-51.1,n=6) 43.2fps∼100%+240%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (22.3-30.5,n=9) 24.6fps∼57%+94%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (9.1-23.7,n=2) 16.4fps∼38%+29%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (6.9-19.9,n=3) 14.5fps∼34%+14%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (7.9-18.6,n=3) 14.2fps∼33%+12%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 12.7(1.793min,8.62P1-71.3max)fps∼29%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (6.64-18.2,n=11) 12fps∼28%-6%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (6-13.4,n=12) 10.6fps∼25%-17%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (4.22-22.9,n=56) 9.74fps∼23%-23%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (3.07-11.6,n=29) 7.53fps∼17%-41%TheWitcher31024x768LowGraphics&PostprocessingAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (127-209,n=22) 167fps∼100%+127%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (92.6-140,n=11) 110.9fps∼66%+51%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (28.9-109,n=87) 82.7fps∼50%+12%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (54.9-86,n=11) 76.6fps∼46%+4%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 73.6(69min-79max)fps∼44%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (40.5-86.9,n=12) 67.4fps∼40%-8%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (38.4-77.5,n=13) 64fps∼38%-13%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (47.4-70,n=24) 60.8fps∼36%-17%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (33.5-92.2,n=47) 60.7fps∼36%-18%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (42.6-72,n=24) 58.2fps∼35%-21%1366x768MediumGraphics&PostprocessingAverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (89.7-126,n=20) 109.4fps∼100%+142%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (34-81.4,n=13) 60.4fps∼55%+33%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (21.4-74.1,n=88) 53.1fps∼49%+17%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 45.3(40min-50max)fps∼41%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (35.2-49.7,n=12) 44.6fps∼41%-2%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (25.1-55.2,n=6) 44fps∼40%-3%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (21.8-56.4,n=50) 39.4fps∼36%-13%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (23.3-49.5,n=12) 38.3fps∼35%-15%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (30-40,n=27) 35.3fps∼32%-22%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (24.4-43.2,n=26) 34.3fps∼31%-24%1920x1080HighGraphics&Postprocessing(NvidiaHairWorksOff)AverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (45-70.4,n=29) 61.7fps∼100%+157%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (21-46,n=15) 34.3fps∼56%+43%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (10.6-45.9,n=88) 28fps∼45%+17%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (20.6-29.9,n=12) 26.2fps∼42%+9%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 24(22min-26max)fps∼39%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (12.5-26.8,n=12) 21fps∼34%-12%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (11.5-24,n=12) 20.2fps∼33%-16%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (16.3-23.1,n=27) 20.1fps∼33%-16%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (9.3-32.3,n=49) 19.8fps∼32%-17%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (13.3-23.8,n=25) 19fps∼31%-21%1920x1080UltraGraphics&Postprocessing(HBAO+)AverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (29.9-40.3,n=31) 35.6fps∼100%+134%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (17.2-24.8,n=15) 20.6fps∼58%+36%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 15.2(14min-17max)fps∼43%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (10.1-17.5,n=11) 15.2fps∼43%0%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (9.74-20.1,n=77) 14.2fps∼40%-7%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (9.33-17.4,n=11) 14.1fps∼40%-7%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (7.9-15.2,n=15) 13.3fps∼37%-12%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (9-16,n=24) 11.6fps∼33%-24%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (6.5-17,n=25) 11.1fps∼31%-27%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (6.26-14.9,n=41) 10.8fps∼30%-29%X-Plane11.111280x720low(fps_test=1)AverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (56.9-107,n=18) 83.6fps∼100%+109%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (58.4-98.5,n=20) 77.6fps∼93%+94%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (49.1-81.9,n=13) 66.4fps∼79%+66%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (48-82.7,n=5) 61fps∼73%+53%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (18.8-73.6,n=16) 53.7fps∼64%+34%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (38.7-64.9,n=16) 49.4fps∼59%+24%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (34.2-59.3,n=18) 41.8fps∼50%+5%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 40fps∼48%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (13.4-88.4,n=103) 36.5fps∼44%-9%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (12.4-57,n=54) 33.9fps∼41%-15%1920x1080med(fps_test=2)AverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (50.5-93.6,n=18) 71.7fps∼100%+125%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (38.2-87.8,n=20) 63fps∼88%+98%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (35.5-65.1,n=13) 54.6fps∼76%+72%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (40.9-56,n=5) 47.6fps∼66%+50%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (9.8-57,n=16) 40.2fps∼56%+26%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (28.7-49.6,n=16) 38.2fps∼53%+20%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (11.6-69.5,n=104) 33.8fps∼47%+6%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (26.5-46.1,n=18) 33.3fps∼46%+5%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 31.8fps∼44%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (11.1-40.5,n=55) 28.6fps∼40%-10%1920x1080high(fps_test=3)AverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (44.5-77.3,n=18) 61.5fps∼100%+120%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (35.4-71.4,n=19) 55.1fps∼90%+97%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (30.2-59.1,n=13) 46.8fps∼76%+68%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150 (36.7-52.3,n=5) 42.8fps∼70%+53%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250 (9.8-52.6,n=16) 39fps∼63%+40%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (25.8-43.1,n=16) 33.6fps∼55%+20%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (11.1-59.8,n=103) 30.2fps∼49%+8%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (23.2-40.8,n=18) 29.6fps∼48%+6%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 27.9fps∼45%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (10.3-36.3,n=55) 25.7fps∼42%-8%StrangeBrigade1280x720lowestAF:1AverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (161-195,n=5) 183fps∼100%+135%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (61.4-137.7,n=11) 116.3fps∼64%+49%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (90.9-92.7,n=2) 91.8fps∼50%+18%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (54.4-105,n=59) 83.6fps∼46%+7%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (45.3-117,n=14) 82.8fps∼45%+6%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 77.9(53.1min,68.2P1-113max)fps∼43%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150  75.3fps∼41%-3%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (43-88.2,n=15) 75fps∼41%-4%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250  71.3fps∼39%-8%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (35.5-88.3,n=35) 63.7fps∼35%-18%1920x1080mediumAA:mediumAF:4AverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (73.8-91.5,n=5) 82.3fps∼100%+159%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (38.6-53.2,n=10) 47.2fps∼57%+48%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (18.8-48.3,n=60) 34.7fps∼42%+9%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (17.6-45.3,n=12) 32.1fps∼39%+1%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (31.7-32.3,n=2) 32fps∼39%+1%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 31.8(26.8min,28P1-39.7max)fps∼39%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (17.3-33.9,n=15) 29.9fps∼36%-6%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150  26.8fps∼33%-16%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250  26.7fps∼32%-16%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (13.3-36.3,n=35) 25.9fps∼31%-19%1920x1080highAA:highAF:8AverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (59.4-73.3,n=5) 66.1fps∼100%+151%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (19.2-46.7,n=11) 39.4fps∼60%+50%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (16.5-38.1,n=60) 28fps∼42%+6%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (15.3-37.7,n=12) 27.2fps∼41%+3%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 26.3(18.3min,20.4P1-52.3max)fps∼40%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (15-28.6,n=15) 25.1fps∼38%-5%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (24.6-25,n=2) 24.8fps∼38%-6%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (11.8-28.8,n=35) 21.3fps∼32%-19%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150  20.9fps∼32%-21%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250  19.9fps∼30%-24%1920x1080ultraAA:ultraAF:16AverageNVIDIAGeForceGTX1650Mobile (49.9-61.6,n=5) 55.9fps∼100%+146%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX450 (18.9-36.6,n=11) 29.2fps∼52%+29%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen5000) (13.3-32.1,n=12) 23.3fps∼42%+3%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG796EUs (14.5-30.8,n=58) 22.8fps∼41%0%GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U,AMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) 22.7(14.5min,16.1P1-63max)fps∼41%AverageAMDRadeonRXVega8(Ryzen4000) (13.3-24.4,n=15) 21.5fps∼38%-5%AverageIntelIrisXeGraphicsG780EUs (13.6-23.6,n=21) 19.1fps∼34%-16%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX350 (18.8-18.9,n=2) 18.9fps∼34%-17%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX150  16.1fps∼29%-29%AverageNVIDIAGeForceMX250  15.7fps∼28%-31% 怠速运行Witcher3在低设置下显示出相对较差的性能一致性。

在测试开始时，帧率会高达55FPS，然后下降到45FPS，然后再跳起来。

性能甚至暂时下降到15FPS，表明背景活动影响了游戏性能。

Witcher3FPSChart 05101520253035404550TooltipGPDWinMax2021R74800U,Vega8R4000:Ø51.9(13-55) low med. high ultraGTAV(2015) 102 89.9 28 12.7 fps TheWitcher3(2015) 73.6 45.3 24 15.2 fps Dota2Reborn(2015) 97.7 80.7 50.8 48.1 fps FinalFantasyXVBenchmark(2018) 35.3 17.6 12.8 fps X-Plane11.11(2018) 40 31.8 27.9 fps FarCry5(2018) 43 20 19 18 fps StrangeBrigade(2018) 77.9 31.8 26.3 22.7 fps Emissions系统噪音风扇噪音在很大程度上取决于是否切换了涡轮风扇模式。

如果激活，在低至中度负荷（如网络浏览或视频流）时，风扇将频繁地脉冲，达到35dB(A)或更高。

在Turbo模式下玩游戏时，风扇噪音会超过49dB(A)，比大多数ULV超极本的噪音还要大。

如果关闭Turbo模式，即使在游戏时，风扇噪音最大也只有34dB(A)，明显更安静，更容易忍受。

最重要的是，禁用涡轮增压模式只会影响温度，而不会影响性能，这意味着用户仍然可以从系统中获得全部性能，而不需要将风扇逼到最大。

双~35毫米风扇。

我们的测试装置没有发现任何电子噪音。

涡轮增压模式未启动时，风扇出奇地安静。

风扇噪音曲线（白色。

背景，红色。

系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark06，橙色：Witcher3，绿色。

Prime95+FurMark压力) GPDWinMax2021Vega8R4000,R74800U,BIWINNS200512GBCNF82GS1G00-512GPDWin3IrisXeG780EUs,i5-1135G7,BIWINNS2001TBCNF82GS1G02-1TBHPPavilionAero13be0097nrVega8R5000,R75800U,IntelSSD660pSSDPEKNW512G8LenovoYoga61382ND0009USVega7,R55500U,WDCPCSN530SDBPMPZ-265GAsusZenBookFlip13UX363EA-HP069TIrisXeG796EUs,i7-1165G7,WDCPCSN730SDBPNTY-1T00Noise-2%17%9%-3%off/environment*23.327.4-18%23.9-3%25.1-8%27-16%IdleMinimum*26.629.1-9%23.910%25.16%27-2%IdleAverage*26.629.1-9%23.910%25.16%27-2%IdleMaximum*26.629.1-9%23.910%25.16%27-2%LoadAverage*46.940.713%32.231%4113%462%Witcher3ultra*4942.813%34.729%38.621%LoadMaximum*49.246.36%34.829%38.721%46.65%*...smallerisbetter NoiseLevel Idle 26.6/26.6/26.6dB(A)Load 46.9/49.2dB(A)     30dBsilent40dB(A)audible50dB(A)loud   min:,med:,max:   EarthworksM23R,Arta(15cmdistance)   environmentnoise:23.3dB(A) dB(A) 0102030405060708090DeepBassMiddleBassHighBassLowerRangeMidsHigherMidsLowerHighsMidHighsUpperHighsSuperHighs2032.935.133.835.334.32527.628.92927.324.53125.324.824.524.2234022.123.920.322.721.25024.324.219.42024.66326.924.320.919.227.78023.725.521.52223.410020.824.718.118.719.312522.120.915.215.721.71602120.415.914.220.920021.220.515.714.321.925022.221.414.413.422.83152523.914.813.625.240028.327.615.912.929.350029.228.515.411.829.663030.728.216.911.330.780030.428.61611.630.5100030.929.1151030.8125032.531.715.21033.3160032.33113.610.232.9200034.832.815.710.635.325003835.71510.938315038.236.41410.938.1400039.437.514.211.339.6500041.939.713.211.441.8630038.836.212.811.539.2800039.13612.911.539.41000036.433.212.811.536.81250035.332.21311.435.81600030.827.615.511.231.3SPL4946.926.623.349.2N6.15.30.80.56.2median30.9median29.1median15median11.5median31.3Delta65.30.91.15.8hearingrangehidemedianshowmedianFanNoiseGPDWinMax2021 温度在涡轮风扇模式激活的情况下，游戏时的热点在点击板上只有38℃左右。

靠近后角的键盘和控制器按钮等重要区域仍然比较凉爽舒适。

当Turbo风扇关闭时，表面温度将略微升高。

后排气管 交流适配器在游戏一小时后达到>49℃。

Max.LoadIdle  33.2°C38°C32.2°C  31.2°C33.6°C32°C  28.2°C28.6°C28.6°C  Maximum:38°CAverage:31.7°C 26.2°C36.4°C30.2°C28.8°C29.2°C28.2°C28°C28.2°C28°C Maximum:36.4°CAverage:29.2°CPowerSupply(max.) 49.2°C|RoomTemperature 21°C|Fluke62MiniIRThermometerMax.LoadIdle  30°C28.8°C29°C  27.2°C27.2°C28.4°C  26.4°C26°C26.2°C  Maximum:30°CAverage:27.7°C 25°C28°C26.6°C26.2°C26.4°C25.8°C26.6°C26°C26.6°C Maximum:28°CAverage:26.4°CRoomTemperature 20°C|Fluke62MiniIRThermometer(+)Theaveragetemperaturefortheuppersideundermaximalloadis31.7°C/89F,comparedtotheaverageof30.8°C/87FforthedevicesintheclassUMPC.(+)Themaximumtemperatureontheuppersideis38°C/100F,comparedtotheaverageof35.3°C/96F,rangingfrom30to40.4°CfortheclassUMPC.(+)Thebottomheatsuptoamaximumof36.4°C/98F,comparedtotheaverageof34.6°C/94F(+)Inidleusage,theaveragetemperaturefortheuppersideis27.7°C/82F,comparedtothedeviceaverageof30.8°C/87F.(+)Thepalmrestsandtouchpadarecoolerthanskintemperaturewithamaximumof28.6°C/83.5Fandarethereforecooltothetouch.(±)Theaveragetemperatureofthepalmrestareaofsimilardeviceswas28.4°C/83.1F(-0.2°C/-0.4F). 系统空闲（顶部 系统闲置（底部 Witcher3压力（顶部 Witcher3应力（底部）压力测试系统空闲当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时，时钟速率会在最初几秒钟内提升到2.4GHz，然后略微下降并稳定在2.2GHz。

有趣的是，涡轮风扇模式并没有提高游戏性能，因为CPU和GPU的时钟速率保持不变。

相反，CPU温度将下降近10摄氏度，如果需要的话，为用户提供额外的超频空间。

用电池供电运行不会限制性能。

在电池上进行的3DMark11测试将返回物理和图形分数，分别为11664和5492分，而在主电源上则为11658和5397分。

Prime95压力（涡轮风扇开启 Prime95+FurMark压力（涡轮风扇开启 Witcher3压力（涡轮风扇关闭 Witcher3压力（涡轮风扇开启 CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(℃) 系统空闲 -- -- 49 Prime95压力 2.2 -- 58 Prime95+FurMark压力 2.3 600 55 Witcher3压力（涡轮风扇关闭） 1.4 1400 76 Witcher3Stress(Turbofanon) 1.4 1375 67 发言人最大音量下的粉红噪音。

在750赫兹左右出现滚落，显示出低频再现不良和"尖锐"的音频质量。

靠近前角的向下发射的立体声扬声器 dB(A) 0102030405060708090DeepBassMiddleBassHighBassLowerRangeMidsHigherMidsLowerHighsMidHighsUpperHighsSuperHighs2033.833.833.82527.82927.83124.924.524.94022.620.322.65023.319.423.36328.220.928.28025.921.525.910027.718.127.712530.515.230.516035.615.935.620038.515.738.525043.614.443.631546.714.846.740052.115.952.150057.915.457.96306316.96380067.61667.61000681568125066.915.266.9160065.313.665.3200063.115.763.1250066.61566.6315073.11473.1400075.214.275.2500069.313.269.3630068.912.868.9800065.612.965.6100005912.8591250057.81357.81600054.915.554.9SPL81.126.681.1N46.10.846.1median63median15median63Delta10.40.910.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median69.6median17.84.62.4hearingrangehidemedianshowmedianPinkNoiseGPDWinMax2021AppleMacBook12(Early2016)1.1GHzFrequencydiagram(checkboxescanbecheckedanduncheckedtocomparedevices)GPDWinMax2021audioanalysis(±)|speakerloudnessisaveragebutgood(81.1dB)Bass100-315Hz(-)|nearlynobass-onaverage25.9%lowerthanmedian(±)|linearityofbassisaverage(7.2%deltatoprev.frequency)Mids400-2000Hz(+)|balancedmids-only4%awayfrommedian(+)|midsarelinear(6.9%deltatoprev.frequency)Highs2-16kHz(±)|higherhighs-onaverage6.4%higherthanmedian(±)|linearityofhighsisaverage(8.4%deltatoprev.frequency)Overall100-16.000Hz(±)|linearityofoverallsoundisaverage(22.2%differencetomedian)Comparedtosameclass»67%ofalltesteddevicesinthisclasswerebetter,33%similar,0%worse»Thebesthadadeltaof21%,averagewas21%,worstwas22%Comparedtoalldevicestested»63%ofalltesteddeviceswerebetter,7%similar,30%worse»Thebesthadadeltaof3%,averagewas20%,worstwas65%AppleMacBook12(Early2016)1.1GHzaudioanalysis(+)|speakerscanplayrelativelyloud(83.6dB)Bass100-315Hz(±)|reducedbass-onaverage11.3%lowerthanmedian(±)|linearityofbassisaverage(14.2%deltatoprev.frequency)Mids400-2000Hz(+)|balancedmids-only2.4%awayfrommedian(+)|midsarelinear(5.5%deltatoprev.frequency)Highs2-16kHz(+)|balancedhighs-only2%awayfrommedian(+)|highsarelinear(4.5%deltatoprev.frequency)Overall100-16.000Hz(+)|overallsoundislinear(9.3%differencetomedian)Comparedtosameclass»2%ofalltesteddevicesinthisclasswerebetter,1%similar,97%worse»Thebesthadadeltaof7%,averagewas19%,worstwas50%Comparedtoalldevicestested»2%ofalltesteddeviceswerebetter,1%similar,97%worse»Thebesthadadeltaof3%,averagewas20%,worstwas65% EnergyManagement消耗功率在没有运行应用程序的情况下，在桌面上空转，根据亮度水平和电源配置文件，消耗5W至8W，这与许多ULV笔记本电脑惊人地相似。

使用小型（约6.4x5.5x2.8厘米）的65瓦USB-C交流适配器，游戏消耗约37瓦。

运行3DMark06时的持续耗电 在Ultra设置下运行Witcher3，耗电量不断。

Prime95压力在10s时启动。

消耗量将飙升至37.7瓦 Prime95+FurMark的压力在10秒时启动。

消耗量将飙升至39.4W PowerConsumption Off/Standby0.87/0.87 WattIdle5.2/6.5/7.4 Watt Load 37.2/39Watt   Key: min:, med:, max:        MetrahitEnergyCurrentlyweusetheMetrahitEnergy,aprofessionalsinglephasepowerqualityandenergymeasurementdigitalmultimeter,forourmeasurements.Findoutmoreaboutithere.Allofourtestmethodscanbefoundhere. GPDWinMax2021R74800U,Vega8R4000,BIWINNS200512GBCNF82GS1G00-512,IPS,1280x800,8.00GPDWin3i5-1135G7,IrisXeG780EUs,BIWINNS2001TBCNF82GS1G02-1TB,IPS,1280x720,5.50HPPavilionAero13be0097nrR75800U,Vega8R5000,IntelSSD660pSSDPEKNW512G8,IPS,1920x1200,13.30LenovoYoga61382ND0009USR55500U,Vega7,WDCPCSN530SDBPMPZ-265G,IPS,1920x1080,13.30AsusZenBookFlip13UX363EA-HP069Ti7-1165G7,IrisXeG796EUs,WDCPCSN730SDBPNTY-1T00,OLED,1920x1080,13.30AsusZenBook13UX325EAi7-1165G7,IrisXeG796EUs,SKHynixHFM001TD3JX013N,OLED,1920x1080,13.30PowerConsumption22%1%-1%3%11%IdleMinimum*5.22.944%3.435%54%4.415%3.631%IdleAverage*6.54.531%6.9-6%6.33%7.4-14%6.33%IdleMaximum*7.44.539%8-8%6.97%11.3-53%7.6-3%LoadAverage*37.238.5-3%42.6-15%41.5-12%2241%3117%Witcher3ultra*38.128.924%35.28%33.213%22.840%LoadMaximum*3941.4-6%43.1-11%46.5-19%42.5-9%368%*...smallerisbetter PowerConsumptionWitcher3/Stresstest 05101520253035Tooltip;Witcher3ultra:Ø38.1(36.5-39);1280x720Prime9528.10andFurmark1.25:Ø38.7(36.3-39.4) 电池寿命57瓦，内部电池比预期的手持设备要大。

在浏览网页时，我们能挤出9个多小时，在不停地玩游戏时，能挤出2到3个小时。

从空电到满电大约需要90分钟。

BatteryRuntime WiFiWebsurfing 9h 15min GPDWinMax2021R74800U,Vega8R4000,57 WhGPDWin3i5-1135G7,IrisXeG780EUs,44 WhHPPavilionAero13be0097nrR75800U,Vega8R5000,43 WhLenovoYoga61382ND0009USR55500U,Vega7,60 WhAsusZenBookFlip13UX363EA-HP069Ti7-1165G7,IrisXeG796EUs,67 WhAsusZenBook13UX325EAi7-1165G7,IrisXeG796EUs,67 WhBatteryRuntime22%-3%43%15%15%Reader/Idle113310501227WiFiv1.355567522%539-3%79143%63915%64015%Load79105121203182Witcher3ultra190 Pros+涡轮风扇不工作时，比预期的要安静 +快速的多线程CPU性能 +易于升级的M.2NVMeSSD +大量的集成端口 +良好的电池寿命Cons-USB-C端口不支持DisplayPort-out或Thunderbolt -没有Wi-Fi6；WLAN性能缓慢 -游戏时有明显的重影现象 -色域狭窄 -吱吱作响的机箱 结论--有希望，但需要更多努力在审查中。

GPDWinMax2021AMDRyzen74800U。

测试装置由GPD提供我们喜欢Windows10UMPC的概念，它足够强大，可用于720p游戏，Ryzen74800U在这方面能够实现。

然而，围绕处理器的实际包装需要改进。

机箱吱吱作响，不舒服，小操纵杆的运动范围太窄，触摸板是跳动的，没有集成网络摄像头，我们的MicroSD读卡器甚至不能工作。

按照今天的标准，集成的WLAN很慢，不支持DP-over-USB，而且显示屏更倾向于预算范围，而不是高端或中端范围，不支持自适应同步。

性能令人钦佩，甚至可以与最新一批TigerLake超极本相媲美。

然而，围绕着处理器的硬件和显示屏需要更多的微调，才能真正将其击倒在地。

较长的电池寿命，涡轮模式下相对安静的风扇噪音，以及令人满意的按键反馈都值得称赞。

然而，我们与WinMax相处的时间越长，就越难忽视更多的小问题。

建议使用酷睿i7版本，以最大限度地提高游戏性能，而我们的Ryzen7SKU将是最大化原始多线程CPU性能的理想选择。

价格和可用性截至本文撰写时，WinMax2021尚未在各在线零售商中广泛销售。

GPD正计划从今年10月开始供货。

GPDWinMax2021 -2021-08-30 08/30/2021v7 AllenNgo Chassis65% Keyboard56 / 80 → 70% PointingDevice57% Connectivity47 / 65 → 73% Weight77 / 35-88 → 80% Battery87% Display80% GamesPerformance64 / 68 → 94% ApplicationPerformance91 / 76 → 100% Temperature92% Noise79 / 91 → 87% Audio74 / 85 → 87% Average67% 79% UMPC-WeightedAverage Pricecompare Editoroftheoriginalarticle:AllenNgo-LeadEditorU.S.-4844articlespublishedonNotebookchecksince2011contactmevia: @AllenNgoNBCTranslator:StefanHinum-Founder,CEO,CFO-18905articlespublishedonNotebookchecksince2006 Pleaseshareourarticle,everylinkcounts! >Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国）>评测>GPDWinMax2021手持式游戏笔记本电脑评测。

Ryzen7比Corei7更慢AllenNgo, 2021-08-30 (Update: 2021-08-30)